Skip to content

DAM (Digital Asset Management)

DAM (Digital Asset Management)

Categories

85 results found

  1. The request is to allow customization of the SEO friendly URL.
    For example, replace a space with a dash (-) and not a plus (+).

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Business analyst / Content integrator

    Instead of uploading one image at the time, multiple images can be selected and uploaded with standard image settings.

    This will make content integration much quicker for large volumes of images.

    Kind regards,
    Jeroen

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Problem Statement:
    When uploading large TIF or high‑resolution print‑quality assets (typically >200 MB), the CMP/DAM fails to generate thumbnails. Instead, users see a broken image icon. Optimizely has confirmed that thumbnails cannot be generated due to internal processing limitations related to file size.
    This causes significant usability issues, as CMP/DAM users rely heavily on thumbnails—not filenames—to identify and select assets.

    1. Desired Outcome / Feature Description We request support for generating thumbnails for large TIFF and high‑resolution images, regardless of original file size, through one of the following approaches (implementation method left to Optimizely):

    The core requirement: All uploaded assets must…

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Allow focal point to be configured by API

    Currently it can only be set from the CMP UI which makes an API call to

    PUT https://cmp.optimizely.com/api/v3/library/image/<id> with the body:

    { "focal_point": { "x": <value>, "y": <value> } }

    The DAM API endpoint https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/content-marketing-platform/reference/patch_images-id should allow us to send this as well.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. When creating or editing a collection, allow to select what assets you would like by folders and sub-folder not just by selecting images. Currently only 100 images can be added at a time. When you have 6,000 images to add to a collection, this is not an efficient process. Collection would run in the background while you work and you can be notified when collection has had all assets loaded.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Upon uploading to a task there is no indication on whether or not content is a duplicate of what exists in the DAM. If it can not be indicated upon import, then can a warning implemented when attempting to save a duplicate to the DAM?

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Optimizely CMP now supports setting a focal point on a per‑rendition basis, but this data is not currently available when querying assets via Optimizely Graph. As a result, consuming applications cannot apply the intended focal point for different rendition sizes.
    Providing this data in the Graph schema and SDK models would ensure consistent rendering behavior between CMP and downstream experiences.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Problem Statement:
    Users in CMP/DAM are currently seeing a banner stating “You only have view rights” with a “Request” button. This banner appears even for users who:

    Already have higher access roles (e.g., CMP Creator)
    Have not been restricted from assets
    Should not be requesting higher access based on internal governance

    When users click “Request”, no notification or approval flow appears anywhere in the admin console ( I am admin) but notifies one seemingly randomly selected admin.

    Support confirmed:

    • The banner cannot be disabled
    • The button cannot be hidden

    We find the process behind the request to be unclear.

    The…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Currently only mandatory fields can be shown during the upload function. It would be very helpful to also have not mandatory fields which can be filled already during the upload.
    If you upload multiple assets it is very time consuming that you need to edit the assets afterwards once again in order to fill all the non-mandatory fields as well.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. When sharing a URL based on a rendition if the user selects all and downloads the zip file, the files are not based on the rendition. The files in the zip file are the original file. The user can only get the rendition image by clicking each file and downloading them individually.

    If a URL is based on a rendition, the end user should be able to download all files in that rendition and NOT the original image.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. I am a marketing coordinator, I upload files to our DAM. I greatly appreciate the feature where we can edit images directly on the DAM. And it would be great if we can do similar editing with video files. Editing tools such as preset crops, filters, adjustment tools and being able to download short clips from the video file would be very useful.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Would like to add the ability to paste a photo into the text part a CMP comment, instead of only adding it as an attachment.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. We need "list view" in collections (and anywhere else not currently offered). This would make large collections much easier to review, avoid consistent file name truncation, and streamline UX.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Improve clarity and prevent user mistakes by redesigning how actions such as “Apply” and “Done” work and are presented in the Upload asset interface. Today, the interface gives mixed signals:

    • Apply appears to save metadata but then clears the fields, causing confusion.
    • "Done" actually performs the upload, but this is not communicated clearly.

    As a result, users believe changes are saved, but the image can disappear without warning.

    Our proposal is to:

    • Clarify button labels and functions (e.g., replace “Done” with “Upload” or “Save & Close”).
    • Ensure metadata fields do not reset unexpectedly.
    • Provide clear confirmation messages and warnings before…
    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Note from Rob Driscoll in https://optimizely-ext.atlassian.net/browse/DAM-4268 - "Free text/number fields do not show in the filtering panel. Will need a feature request to support that."

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Organizations need to comply with GDPR and other data privacy regulations. Assets that are tied to consent (e.g., photos of people, campaign materials) currently require manual governance. Without automation, there is a high risk of expired or unauthorized assets remaining accessible, which can lead to compliance issues and reputational damage.

    Proposed Solution:

    Asset Expiry Date: Allow editors to set an expiry date on assets. After expiry, the asset is automatically unpublished/disabled and removed from search results and delivery endpoints.

    Consent Linking: Enable assets to be linked to consent records (e.g., GDPR consent, model releases). If the consent expires or is…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Request to be able to create renditions from uploaded .eps files in the DAM. Currently only supports PNG, JGP, and WEBP

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. We’d like to suggest adding more flexibility around asset ownership assignment. Currently, the person who uploads an asset is automatically set as the owner, but we want the ability to preset or designate asset owners separately. This is important because asset owners receive “request to edit” emails, and we want to prevent these notifications from going to non-admin users that might be the asset owners. Typically, users request edit access when they actually only need to download the asset, leading to unnecessary owner involvement and incorrect permission assignments. Allowing preset ownership would help streamline this process. reduce confusion and ensure…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. In order for the select all option to appear, one asset needs to be selected first. Can the select all just always be available?

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Allow restrictions on who can upload to a particular folder - need to be able to block admins/creators from uploading to a single folder and give them view only access. Currently view only access still allows them to upload.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?