Skip to content

Web Experimentation

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

17 results found

  1. I am the Product Manager at Hearst Magazines.
    Our current Web Experimentation implementation is set up with the snippet in the <body> tag, which causes significant flicker for experiments involving changes above the fold.
    Your new Edge on CDN feature could be a game changer for us. However, the blocker is that we currently use Fastly CDN, which is not supported by your Edge product.

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. To shorten the set-up time, rather than clicking each metric separately, Michael proposes an option to multi-select metrics in the dropdown with checkboxes.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. I would like to be able to test multiple audiences on the same page, to see how the activities associated with those audiences would appear to a user in multiple audiences.

    The Optimizely preview helper would be a great way to do this. In the override, it currently only shows the audiences associated with the campaign being previewed. If this allowed for the override to allow for any audiences to be selected, and hence allow to test for how it might look for a user who is in multiple audiences, it would be extremely helpful.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Its inconvenient navigating back and forth

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. There are common WYSIWYG editor problems, based on site architecture or test type. Create self-service solutioning guides for customers to diagnose and solve problem.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Give customers the ability to create own labels to attach to experiments, and make these columns you can add in the overview, as well as making it filterable and sortable. This feature would help create ownership of experiments

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. I am the product owner of the web experimentation platform. We also use the CMP. I connected the two platforms so that we could collaborate on variations, view metrics & run time within the CMP, however, results are not viewable within the CMP.

    This defeats a large purpose of the connection between the two tools, because I want users within the CMP to see the results within our projects, without having to go into the Experimentation platform. This will save me time manually reporting on experiments, and would enable anyone who is part of that CMP Hypothesis to see the…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. The ability to split tests based on geographical region so that we can test the effectiveness of region-specific marketing campaigns, two-sided marketplaces, or faciliate other testing use cases when we cannot guarantee a user will be in solely the control or test variant.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Currently Web Experimentation Audience Attributes only support values as string types. Adding support for number values (floats, integers) would allow for more complex and granular audience membership.

    Customer provided example: An audience for visitors who have less than 100 subscriptions. The Audience Attribute numSubscriptions would be a number value of the total number of subscriptions the visitor has. This attribute could be used to build an audience for all visitors with less than X (ex. 100) subscriptions.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. State exactly why it was flagged; would likely require customer to input some data

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. The changes work when you are in the tool , but do not actually work in the wild. Something overwrites the code from the customer's website.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Customers try to load their website in the Visual Editor and it never finishes loading

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Customers attempt to use the visual editor to make persistent changes, but the changes do not persist throughout the entire user journey as the selector changes either on reload or if new DOM elements are present on different pages.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Once a test is concluded, export the changes as a set of code in HTML+CSS+JS, or React, etc. Has come up several times in the past month. Suggest investigating whether competitors do this.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Prospects that have had tests "break" their site want an automated solution for monitoring the quality of their test variations in production, and to be alerted immediately when there are issues that negatively impact UX.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. This should help teams understand the concept of run-time, and avoid tests being run that are destined to become inconclusive.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Customers use the Chrome Plug-in often for debugging, QA and forcing themselves into variations. It does not always work, and is pretty limited.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?