Skip to content

Web Experimentation

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

23 results found

  1. It would be great to be able to create folders in the experiments list to group items together. (Not the sort feature). Often, I have multiple experiments (separate mobile and desktop project that are the same content) - it would be useful to be able to organize these into groups - like in a file folder system. (See mockup)

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. I am proposing that we upgrade to ES11 to stay aligned with the latest JavaScript standards and leverage modern language features such as optional chaining, nullish coalescing, and Promise.allSettled. These enhancements significantly simplify handling complex asynchronous logic, reduce verbose and repetitive code, and improve overall readability and maintainability of our experiment scripts.

    While we understand that upgrading is not strictly required to run experiments, adopting ES11 is vital for our growth and development as devs. It enables us to build more robust and reliable A/B tests, accelerate development and iteration cycles, and minimize technical debt. Keeping pace with evolving web…

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Frequently I need to switch my coding / set up from a staging to a production environment. Optimizely warns me and then REMOVES all my code.

    This is fine if you are a basic non-technical user.

    It would be better if this was an optional change.

    Possibly provide a check box and a message in the button (see screenshot) - which would allow me to change the targeting.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. I am the Product Manager at Hearst Magazines.
    Our current Web Experimentation implementation is set up with the snippet in the <body> tag, which causes significant flicker for experiments involving changes above the fold.
    Your new Edge on CDN feature could be a game changer for us. However, the blocker is that we currently use Fastly CDN, which is not supported by your Edge product.

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Customers use the Chrome Plug-in often for debugging, QA and forcing themselves into variations. It does not always work, and is pretty limited.

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Optimizely still captures data (decision events) for experiments that have already been archived or concluded. This data gets added to the BigQuery tables, which is undesirable. We'd prefer a cut-off, so that decisions for archived/concluded experiments do not get recorded in BigQuery.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. I would like to easily see deployed variations from winning tests alongside Active/Running tests. Since deployed variations are only visible in the Concluded section, it's easy for them to get lost.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Deployed experiments (winner rollout) should be active in Preview mode for other experiments.

    Currently, when an experiment is concluded, and the winning variation is deployed, this deployed variation is active for all visitors on the website. However, when Previewing another/new experiment, that deployed experiment is not active.

    Since the deployed variation should be considered the "is-state" of the website, and it is publicly visible to regular visitors, it should also be visible in the Preview mode.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. As an experimentation program manager in an experimentation COE with no access permissions to build a system to assess API data but with access to data tools that I can use to build out queries and dashboards.

    I want to be able to access meta information on experiments (the same data set accessible via the API) in my s3 (bigQuery, etc.) feed.

    So I can build queries and dashboards to assess and report on the health of the program, create alerts, etc.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Show which audience a visitor matched when an Experiment has multiple audiences.

    Both the Audience builder and the Experiments builder support OR clauses. However, there is no way to dissect the data to know which specific Audience triggered the experiment for the visitor. Our organization will run experiments where we may use a Javascript based audience and a Real-time segments audience to trigger a single experiment. The Experiment report will show the visitor to variations counts but there is no way to tell which audience the visitor matched.
    The suggestion is to have a breakdown of the visitor counts, by…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Since Optimizely keeps a 'log' of changes -- why can't we have a "Restore to this version" in the history log.

    It's nice to see what happened in the log, but the ability to restore to a previous version would be invaluable when editing and changes have been saved and going back a few versions is critical to avoid having to redo the entire variation setup.

    See attached UX suggestion.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. As an experimenter, I should see a warning/alert when changing an Audience in either Web or FX that is being used in an active experiment to prevent unwanted impacts on live experiments.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Hello!

    I often have visitors classified into different audiences accessing the same page. It would be nice to be able to experiment with different communications based on the visitor's audience. Today, to have this type of granularity, I need to set up an experiment for each type of audience.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. I constantly get requests from product manager or other team members asking, "What is running on the site in Optimizely". Not everyone has access to look at the reporting dashboard/program overview.

    The idea is for a view that can be shared and configured by an Optimizely Admin - and then can be shared. No login is needed for this view.

    The view can contain a number of items (similar to the current program overview) and could be filtered by the admin to only show experiments that are relevant to the business goals or the view's audience.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Feedback from client: I want to be able to search for an old test on the results dashabord just once, rather than have to search for it within each status category.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. State exactly why it was flagged; would likely require customer to input some data

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Give customers the ability to create own labels to attach to experiments, and make these columns you can add in the overview, as well as making it filterable and sortable. This feature would help create ownership of experiments

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. When removing an integration (turning it off), it warns the user for any published, paused experiments, and tell them to archive. It would be helpful if "concluded" experiments would also be considered as a valid option, so we don't have to archive concluded tests to turn off an integration

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Role: Onboarding Solution Architect

    Issue:
    For the Audience Condition Ad Campaign "When selecting Visitor does not come from, it is a common interpretation that anyone who comes to a page, except those from an ad campaign would be selected. But this is not true. Instead, the user must come from an ad campaign, just not the one you specify to be targeted. "

    Request:
    Change this audience condition to match the intuitive and common interpretation "common interpretation that anyone who comes to a page", essentially to evaluate anyone and not just those visitor coming from an ad campaign.

    This would…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Once a test is concluded, export the changes as a set of code in HTML+CSS+JS, or React, etc. Has come up several times in the past month. Suggest investigating whether competitors do this.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1
  • Don't see your idea?