389 results found
-
Use Calendar as an Overall Planning Tool
Role:
AdminIssue:
We are currently unable to filter by events/campaigns going live during a certain time frame.Desired Outcome:
We'd like the ability to filter content calendar by launch or event dates happening within a specific month1 vote -
Add the Ability for Admins to Customize campaign Titles
Role:
AdminIssue:
There are currently three campaigns types in Optimizely CMP, which effectively act like (1) a main "parent" campaign, (2) a sub-campaign, and (3) a third-level campaign. In the system, they are all titled and referred to as 'campaign.'We'd like to be able to customize these titles so they are differentiated for users. So Campaign might still be the name of the first tier, but we'd like to call the second level a 'sub-campaign..' and the third-tier could be something else like, 'marketing initiative.'
Impact:
By creating these differing names, users will better understand the hierarchy in…1 vote -
Allow Basic Text Editor for Help Text Authoring
Role: Admin
Issue:
Currently, when authoring help text, there is no way to add a hyperlink.
Desired Outcome:
We'd like to be able to open up a simple WYSIWYG dialogue for Help Text that will allow a link title to be authored. If possible, we'd also like to have the option to bold, underline, and italicize text.Impact:
Currently, teams are not able to share critical information (that's in the form of a PDF or webpage) with users because there is no way to author this in Help Text.1 vote -
Ability for admins to create a field within the Workflow configuration area
Role:
AdminIssue: We'd like the ability to create a new field during workflow configuration, like what's avaialble in the Work Request dialogue.
Currently, while authoring a workflow a user has to leave the entire workflow dialogue and go to the fields area to create a new field. Then the must come BACK to the worfklow to add the new field there.
We'd like to havee the option to create AND ADD a new field right there in the workflow dialogue
1 vote -
Add durations to Sub-Steps
Role:
AdminIssue:
At the moment, there is no way to document SLAs for sub-steps. We'd like to be able to do this in the same way that it is done for whole steps.1 voteWe are currently working on a resource module that would allow time estimates at the sub-step level. Although duration will remain at the step level, the new time estimates at the substep level will hopefully allow users to track data at a more granular level equivalent to if we added durations to sub-step.
-
Remove Padding in Work Request
Role: Admin
Issue:
There appears to be a significant amount of padding between fields and text. Oftentimes, we need to use the text option to explain a field because there is a character limit on help text. So we're using the text feature to explain what ought to be in help text.1 vote -
Remove Character Limits on Help Text
We'd love to be able to remove the character limits for Help Text.. Currently, the help text limit is 120 characters, and most teams need more space than this to explain their ask.
1 vote -
Remove elipses from Checkbox items
Role: Admin
Issue:
When creating a field using the Checkbox function, all options in the field are limited to a certain character limit before an elipses appears. We'd like to remove those ellipsis.Expected Outcome:
No ellipses appears on any options authored in Checkboxes.1 vote -
Allow conditional/branching logic in workflows
Add logic to fields in workflows/task forms: A way to have the dropdown options trigger a sub-dropdown list with items that are only applicable to the item selected in the first dropdown.
This functionality already exists in Work Requests.
For example, we need to know if your dog barks at night, but only if you chose dog in the "Do you have a dog or cat?" field. Cat owners shouldn't have to respond to the question about barking since it's not relevant.
1 vote -
required
Role: Admin
Issue:
In Work Request, if there are ANY fields in the form that are required, then everyone has to fill out that field (even if they would've skipped that field due to logic authored in a previous field.) We need a way to make only certain fields required for certain responders so that we segregate who has to answer certain questions.Expected Outcome:
When authoring a work request, and logic is applied to certain fields, only those who logically land on that field should be required to fill it out.1 vote -
Functionality that doesn't force dropdown list to be in alphabetical order
Role: Admin
Issue:
In dropdowns, we'd like to be able to maintain the ordered list of items as they've been authored. Currently, no matter which order you author the content in a dropdown, it will be re-ordered so that the items in the dropdown list are in alphabetical order.Teams have been trying different things to get around this, as you can imagine they have a particular order they'd like to see their items, and for good reason. Having a list of 20 items (and then "N/A" showing up in the middle of the list instead of at the bottom…
1 vote -
Owner/Creator user type for templates
We are creating workflows where steps of the workflow ALWAYS need to go back to the user who created/started the workflow.
It would be really useful to have an option to select "Task Owner", or similar, as a pre-defined user/team on a workflow template step, instead of the user having to assign steps back to themselves manually in every task.
1 vote -
backdate
Should be able to backdate start/end dates in requests.
3 votes -
log in as
I'm an admin trying to do some troubleshooting. I would like to have a feature in CMP to "log in as" another user to better understand issues reported by users.
1 vote -
Ability to annotate a PDF without a comment being attached
Our team regularly proofed large (think 200 page) PDFs. We often use annotation features like the strikeout for other team members to make changes, but currently every single strikeout requires an associated comment. I understand the need to have comments with other types of annotations for guidance, but given the intent of a strikeout is pretty clear, could there be a setting to make comments not mandatory for a strikeout?
5 votes -
DAM Asset History
Provide Asset History in the DAM/Library, similar to the History in a Task. It is important to be able to see a log of what has been done to the asset, whether it was moved, a URL was generated, etc.
4 votes -
Request to Disable Report Notification Emails
It would be helpful to provide an option for users or customer organizations to choose whether they want to receive generated reports via email.
4 votes -
Use the holiday list for commercial purposes (not OOO)
I perceive the CMP organization calendar as an "external helper", and not a way to keep track on who is OOO - as other tools do that already.
Any way to add holidays without them impacting inviduals OOO settings?
1 vote -
Enhanced Task Permissions: contribute once assets or steps are approved but not edit
We need to limit some users in what they can do in a task, like they can add content or complete their steps, but they can't change fields or asset expiry date once the asset has been approved in the task
2 votes -
Enhanced Library Permissions - to archive but not delete
We would like members of teams to be able to archive assets in a folder, whilst not having permissions to delete the asset.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?