575 results found
-
Efficiency dashboards - Who is completing a step by due date
It would be great to be able to view who is completing a step by the due date
2 votes -
Print view for History tab
Regulated industries often have to provide control adherence evidence. Adding an option to a printable version of the history tab would be incredibly helpful. This would work similar to recipe websites, just a clean view with the ticket number, ticket title, and the history tab entries that we can save to PDF for auditors.
1 vote -
Opal sounded friendly and was obviously an AI, Mark sounds bland and is not obviously not a team member - we have several people called Mark
Opal sounded friendly and was obviously an AI, Mark sounds bland and is not obviously not a team member - we have several people called Mark on our team and this just causes confusion.
Why not make the name configurable - then each business can decide what makes sense for them.
Mark is a step backward in usability.
1 vote -
Uploading Content to Completed Tasks
Once someone marks off the last workflow task in a task, you're no longer allowed to upload anything to the content section unless you go back into the Workflow and uncheck a step first.
We want the ability to upload files to "completed" or "archived" tasks without having to re-open the task.
1 vote -
In-Campaign View Editing
Unable to edit columns within campaigns // OUTSIDE of 'plan'.
This makes managing & organizing large groups of tasks difficult - to get around this, a user has to create a custom view.
Requesting the ability to add & edit columns within the campaign (under the "activities" tab)
1 vote -
Possibility to see who has created and/or edited a workflow or a template or a field
As one of several admins in the setup phase, I want to be able to see who has created and/or edited a workflow, or a template or a field. Currently I have no idea if it is something I created, or someone else, and we either end up having a jungle of everything, or I delete something that someone else or an agent needs.
This would preferably show both in relation to the workflow, and be a possibility to extract a report with the information.
3 votes -
List View enhancements
It would be nice to have the list view be the default instead of tile view. The tiles are not helpful.
If tile view HAS to be default, can we change settings on my end to have it be list view instead of having to change it to list every single time?
We'd like to be able to see the full title of the attachment name w/o having to pull the field over (its like this is an excel file??)
The file size doesn’t need to be there at all.
We don’t need to see who uploaded it.
We want…
1 vote -
Collections to support granular/restricted visibility (respect asset or folder permissions, or an explicit access list)
Today, a Collection in CMP has no access list of its own and does not inherit or enforce the permissions of the assets or folders it references. Once an asset is added to a collection, it becomes visible to every internal user with Library access across the organisation, regardless of the asset's own sharing settings (private, team-restricted, etc.). There is currently no admin setting or custom role permission that restricts a collection to a defined set of users or teams, and no privacy/draft state on the collection itself.
The only lever that exists (password, expiration, renditions) governs the external public…
2 votes -
Restrict Public Link Generation Based on Asset Field Value
This feature would give the ability to prevent public links from ever being generated for assets tagged with a specific field value (e.g. "Internal") while other external facing asset would still have public URLs automatically generated.
Currently there is no built-in way to make public link creation conditional on a field value, which means sensitive or internal-only assets can be inadvertently exposed.
Right now, public link creation, both individual generation and the bulk "Add Public Link" action, has no relationship with asset metadata. A custom field can classify an asset as internal, but it can't stop a link from being…
2 votes -
Title: Bi-directional field sync between Hypothesis Brief, Fields tab, and Plan view
Description: Enable field updates made in the Fields tab or Plan view to automatically update the corresponding fields in the Hypothesis Brief, ensuring the Brief remains an up-to-date summary for stakeholders without requiring manual cross-updates.
17 votes -
Pull picklists for fields via APIs
We would like the be able to control the picklist values for certain dropdown fields by calling in a list from another system that is the source of truth. For example, we might want to have a field for client name that pulls from CRM, or use the same list of regions that we manage in our CMS. In both of these cases, the source of truth is the non-CMP system and we'd benefit from being able to manage elsewhere, keeping up to date dynamically in CMP via API.
1 vote -
Allow "Brief" tab to be removed by task/campaign template
We are trying to move toward having one single, shared campaign brief that informs all downstream activities for a given campaign. The brief should live at the very top level and then all nested tasks/campaigns should be using the brief at the top level, rather than having their own brief.
To help instill this, we want our users to avoid the "Brief" tab in our downstream tasks/campaigns so that we don't create shadow briefs (if specific info is needed downstream, our users should use the "Content" field for uploads or fields to map in the necessary details). Rather than training…
1 vote -
Automatically Add Designated Watchers Based on Workflow
We would like the ability to designate default watchers at the workflow level. When a workflow is applied to a task or hypothesis, those designated individuals would automatically be added as watchers.
Today, users are only automatically added as watchers if they are assigned to a step within the workflow. However, there are many cases where stakeholders need more visibility into progress and updates without owning any workflow steps.
Proposed Enhancement:
Add a "Default Watchers" section to workflow configuration.
Allow workflow administrators to specify one or more users as watchers.When the workflow is used to create or update a…
3 votes -
Banner prevent adding fields into the Filter pane
When there is a banner, such as 'You only have view access to this folder | Request Edit Access' and you want to filter with the left hand panel, then the scrolling doesn't all a user to scroll down far enough to add in custom fields.
2 votes -
Ability to reorder filter panel items and default to include all 'Fields'
don't need to filter by Quick Filters, File Formats, Content Model Name, Content Types, Created Date, Expiry Date, Languages, Modified Date, Owner, Shared By, Starred, Status of Campaigns.
We would like to move the 'Fields' option to the top of the list to make it easy for users to find.
It would also be good to have all the fields included by default, instead of having to add them in for each user.
2 votes -
The ability to set individual duration for sub-steps in a workflow
The ability to set individual duration for sub-steps. Now the dates of the sub-steps are just what was set on the initial step created.
2 votes -
Plan view: Display name on browsers tab or create header
We have several plan views for different tasks or priorities. It will be ideal to be able to see the name of the plan view we have currently active on our browser. A lot of times we can't tell where we are that we need to click on the plan view to see it.
If will be useful to have the title of the plan view show in the browser's tab and also have a header at top so we know which plan view we are on.
1 vote -
Version-aware (cache-busting) thumbnail URLs
CMP reuses the same image address across every version of an asset, combined with a ~24h browser cache header, so a genuinely up-to-date asset can show a stale thumbnail until a hard refresh. A URL that changes per version (or a shorter cache lifetime) would fix this.
1 vote -
Hidden Fields
We have an internal reference field (Canva Design ID) that is used by an integration. Editors never need to see or touch this, but CMP has no way to hide it — it just sits there next to the fields that matter. A "hidden" or "internal use" flag on custom fields would clean this up.
2 votes -
Default values
CMP seems to only shows a custom field once an asset has a value for it, and there's no way to set a schema-level default — so every asset created before an app is installed permanently shows no field until something writes to it.
I have a custom checkbox field with simple options/values for 'yes' and 'no'... but the field itself is not presented until an editor adds it. So if I want the editor to select their preference, they need to add the field then set the value every time.
If I could set the default value to 'no'…
1 vote
.png){kind=link}
- Don't see your idea?