Skip to content

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

225 results found

  1. When there are issues with the servicebus it is not possible to see what went wrong many times. You can go to the servicebus and look at the graph and see that there are "server errors" and "user errors" and "throttled messages"but there is no way to see the details of the server errors or the user errors.
    Some times we can see a log entry in the CMS logs but not always and I guess it depends on the type of error.
    If we had more information it would help when troubleshooting customers having problems with the servicebus.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Immutable Backups are increasingly becoming cybersecurity and resilience best practice.
    Currently CMS PaaS data is not covered by immutable backups. To further protect us against ransomware attacks and accidental or malicious data tampering having this as a standard or at least optional feature would be highly desirable, providing a reliable last line of defense for fast and trustworthy recovery after a cyber incident or operational failure.
    Any update on timeline for its availability would be very much appreciated.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. We need to receive alerts when a site goes into failover. The failover CMS should show a warning that its disabled during failover (instead of error message).

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Location of Settings in CMS 12: Difficulty locating the "Automatic published media on upload" setting in CMS 12, which affects workflow and publishing behavior.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Media Publishing Confusion: Contributors often forget to publish or submit new/updated media (e.g., PDFs, images) for review, as the system does not prompt them, resulting in drafts being left unapproved. 

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Page‑level updates are not reflected in version history:
    When a block on a page is updated, the page‑level version history does not show the recent change. Instead, version history is tracked only at the block level, not for the page as a whole. As a result, it can appear that a page has not been updated even when changes have been made.

    For example the Child Health Policy Accelerator | SickKids page was updated couple of days ago, but the last update details are showing of October 2025.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Reviewers lack visibility into where blocks and media objects are used across the site, unless someone published the landing page/parent block where the block is supposed to be placed. This lead to time-consuming searches and uncertainty during approval.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Upon uploading to a task there is no indication on whether or not content is a duplicate of what exists in the DAM. If it can not be indicated upon import, then can a warning implemented when attempting to save a duplicate to the DAM?

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Export / Import  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Integration and preproduction environments are sometimes protected by IP-whitelists and in those cases the warmup step always fails with status code 401. The warmup system waits for about 15 minutes until these requests time out. This increases delivery times to these environments specially when CI/CD is set up.

    Ex:
    2026-03-10 12:40:24 Information Starting to warm up the targets slots...
    2026-03-10 12:40:25 Information Preparing target slot for Go Live (<masked>/slot) (warming up the slot)
    2026-03-10 12:52:21 Warning Timed out waiting for all instances for webapp <masked> and slot "slot" to become ready!
    2026-03-10 12:52:21 Information Validating deployment ID uniqueness between slots…

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Currently, in the PaaS CMS, with Blocks, there is a Quick Edit option on the context menu when you click on a block in a content area. The opens a modal that allows the author to edit the block right there, and even publish, without having to load a whole new page in the CMS. This is nice because it allows for much quicker editing.

    We sometimes have cases where a project wants to store a lot of information with each image. More than just a title and copyright. They would like to be able to use Quick Edit on…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. I've been burned a few times by publishing content on the wrong environment, e.g. publishing a change in a test page on Integration only to learn I was actually on Production. Woops!

    And it's not just me. I know of times our clients have done this, and other members of our team.

    Can I suggest some sort of UI indicator (other than just the URL) to indicate which environment you're on?

    • Maybe you could output the name of the environment in the header?
    • Maybe you could you update the 'Publish Changes' button to read 'Publish Changes to {ENVIRONMENT}'?
    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  2 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. As a content editor,
    I want to search for existing blocks within the “Select Content” shortcut window, so that I can quickly find and reuse the required content without manually browsing through multiple options.

    Background / Problem Statement:

    Currently, when creating a new block in Optimizely CMS, users are presented with two options:
    Create a new block
    Select content

    When selecting “Select Content”, a shortcut window opens displaying available blocks. However, this window lacks a search functionality, making it difficult and time-consuming to locate specific content, especially when the number of blocks is large.

    Navigation Path:

    Main Content → Select…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. The default hardware SKU for Optimizely is P1V3. P1V3 only has 2 cores and P2V3 has 4 cores. Because the number of cores available to the system dictates the number of default threads the system attempt to regulate, it would be best to deviate away from our current default hardware SKU, P1V3 to P2V3, instead. However, doing so would increase costs which we do not want to do necessarily. This is a proposal to decrease costs while simultaneously increasing hardware resources during peak hours.

    The idea is to increase a customer's lower environment hardware to P2V3 during "working hours" (to…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. My role: Expert Service Application Engineer.

    We’re working on adding a deletion workflow similar to the existing approval workflow.
    Outcome: We need the ability to configure an approval process not only for publishing content, but also for deleting it.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. I am a Technical Support Engineer submitting this feedback on behalf of a customer. The customer is using Optimizely CMS and relies on Optimizely Graph to synchronize content between the CMS and the search index.

    Currently, the CMS shows synchronization status only under the Options menu. The text labels such as "Not changed since last publish" or "Synchronize with Optimizely Graph" are not visually prominent. Editors cannot quickly determine whether a page is already synchronized, out of sync, or requires re-synchronization. This makes it difficult for editors to know the current state of content without navigating menus.

    The customer suggests…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Graph  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. I would like to use the newer WebApplicationBuilder / IHostApplicationBuilder introduced in .NET 6 to initialize the CMS instead of the .NET Core 3 method of using IHostBuilder, because .NET Aspire does not support IHostBuilder. The ConfigureCmsDefaults method does not support WebApplicationBuilder, and even though the following code will compile, the CMS is not usable:

    var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
    builder.Host.ConfigureCmsDefaults();

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Implementation  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. We are experiencing some redirection issues we have no control over as they are done in the root domain.

    http://oldsite.com redirects to https://www.oldsite.com then finally to https://www.newsite.com

    The redirection should be as follows:

    http://oldsite.com -> https://oldsite.com -> https://www.newsite.com

    Please update Optimzely’s configuration to do these redirects properly

    30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Clients should have the ability to regenerate Content Graph keys and secrets in the self-service Paas portal.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. The Optimizely PAAS CMS platform has multiple touchpoints where scripts are injected into the frontend UI. Examples include Optimizely Forms, Content Recommendations, Search & Navigation etc.

    When these scripts are injected into the UI, they are not added with a Sub-resource Integrity attribute. An SRI check allows us to instruct the browser that it should not load a tampered version of a JS or CSS file and can protect users from man in the middle attacks. You can read more about SRI here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/Subresource_Integrity

    This is a commonly reported issue in penetration tests and clients are becoming increasingly more security…

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. When previewing unpublished pages in the CMS, nested blocks (such as unpublished child blocks within a parent block) do not display correctly at the page level, making it impossible for publishers to see the full layout and content as it will appear when published. This limitation forces the team to rely on the Advanced Review plugin, which does show all nested unpublished content but introduces extra steps and performance issues.

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 11 12
  • Don't see your idea?