Skip to content

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

175 results found

  1. Scrolling for this property is too fast on Macbook (testet Edge and Chrome:
    [UIHint("TimeOnly"]
    public virtual DateTime? StartTime { get; set; }
    Adjusting scroll in mouse settings doesn't help.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. This is the drawback right now with local blocks:
    1. There is no way to map the inline local blocks between versions or language contexts. Why not add a GUID?
    2. There is no way in the UI (Dojo JavaScript API to determine if the context is within "inline blocks dialog" or to identify which ContentArea it resides in, or to direct link to an inline block.
    as a plugin developer, this is needed to map content and build great plugins. .

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. As a marketer, I would like to translate content (pages, blocks, etc. into several languages at the same time, and therefore in just one step.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Please put Smart Publish back in the Publish menu. It disappeared in the move to CMS 12 and the only thing my team can find that's even close is to the same functionality is to:
    1. Create a new Project.
    2. Make any changes in the new project.
    3. Hit Overview.
    4. Publish Items from Overview .
    Not only is that not intuitive at all, but it's significantly more work (especially if you forget and make a bunch of changes in the Primary Draft, because then you have to redo them in the new Project.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Problem
    We are using the Plugin in Optimizely CMS to easily connect Optimizely Forms to Salesforce Marketing Cloud Data Extensions. This works very well when the user that's used to configure the connector only has access to 1 Business Unit (MID in Salesforce. However, as I understand from Salesforce, many customers work with instances that have multiple Business Units. This means that from Salesforce stand point, you need to provide to which Business Unit you want to connect when authenticating, but the plugin does not provide a means to specify this. To solve this, we now had to create multiple…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. The EPiServer.Framework.Blobs.Blob base class lacks many async methods. E.g. There is Write(, but no WriteAsync(.
    Curiously, it contains AsFileInfoAsync(, but that is about it. Everything else is not using async.
    Please fix.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. We would like to be able to filter tasks/campaigns in CMP by assignee->teams with the action just pulling in tasks/campaigns that have been assigned to that specific team. The current functionality pulls in all task/campaigns that assigned to all users within the team, regardless of the team being involved. It makes the use of the team feature irrelevant.
    Current functionality:
    Filter assignee: Team 1 (user 1 & user 2
    Plan view:
    - All tasks assigned to user 1
    - All tasks assigned to user 2
    The ideal action would be able to filter assignee->team. Filtered results would show only items…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. For a property of type ContentArea which is restricted to a certain pagetype, the search field is not visible.
    [AllowedTypes(typeof(CabinPage]
    public virtual ContentArea Cabins { get; set; }

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. In the CMS Editor, when a content area has AllowedTypes specified, it always lists types that are not allowed in the hint text. However, the list that's not allowed is not complete.
    We expect the only the types that are allowed to be listed.
    Example
    [AllowedTypes(typeof(CustomDataAttributeBlock]
    public virtual ContentArea? GAAttributes { get; set; }
    CMS Editor shows:
    Only Custom Attribute Block types, but not Form elements, Form step, Rich text (with placeholders, or Form Location URL.
    Expected:
    Only Custom Attribute Block types

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. The file upload used in the [Import Data] feature in the Settings interface does not limit the file extensions to .episerverdata only. Other file extensions can be uploaded (including files in a zipped file, which may pose security threat to the platform. Specially, when uploading a zipped antivirus test file, the system will display <Import successful>.
    Allowing an undesirable or malicious file to reside on a system—even if it is not immediately executed or processed—constitutes a security vulnerability in itself. "Unrestricted upload of file with dangerous type" is formally documented as a common weakness under CWE-434, highlighting that simply permitting…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. The current implementation of the DateTime element (found in the EpiServer.Forms.Samples package appears to be insufficient.
    In the DateTimeElementBlock.js file, the logic used to determine the language format relies on the browser's language settings. However, this approach fails, as many Danish users have their browsers set to English (US by default, resulting in the language code en-US. This causes the jQuery date picker to display the wrong date format.
    var _utilsSvc = epi.EPiServer.Forms.Utils,
    language = navigator.language || navigator.userLanguage, // on iOS naviagtor.language is in lower case (ex: en-us
    dateFormatSettings = epi.EPiServer.Forms.Samples.DateFormats[language.toLowerCase(] || epi.EPiServer.Forms.Samples.DateFormats["en-us"],
    dateFormat = dateFormatSettings.pickerFormat;
    A better solution would…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. At the moment, there's no way to superscript trademark or registered symbols in the copy within the email. The only way to edit this is within an element.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. As a developer I want to use local.domainname.com without a license, so we don't have to keep creating licenses for every developer.
    The documentation (https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/content-management-system/docs/set-up-a-development-environment#licenses states:
    A license is not required when running on localhost or domainname.local.
    However, we had to switch from domainname.local to local.domainname.com (due to a third-party integration.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Some of our clients use Inline blocks only and it would be nice if the Language translation gadget would be capable of also providing translation files for these blocks.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. No other site or system I have seen have a red asterisk when property is filled correctly. I think you should find another icon to show required, not one that is used for errors.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. We want to use Marketing automative Salesforce connector for Optimizely CMS(Customer Management System form to connect with our Salesforce platform.
    But we find out there are no submission failure show up on CMS interface, only recording the submit data in "form submission" dropdown.
    This is unhelpful and not user-friendly for CMS user, developers, and infrastructure people. We cannot track/ debug/ get notice when form is submitting unsuccessful when Salesforce end shows data field mapping error.
    There's no way every-time we have to login application insights, and search for request unsuccessful/ view live log stream. Please add the error notice, error…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Requirement:
    * We are currently implementing the personalization on basis of combination of different Audiences using the Azure groups with their respective roles in Optimizely.
    * It is required that certain pages/blocks need to show for some groups and hide for others.
    * This could be different based on the requirements.
    Challenges:
    * The challenge is that we cannot see the direct overview of different personalization under the Audiences (except the list of groups under the Audiences.
    * In addition and more importantly, there is no overview of where these Audience groups are used within the website.
    * These groups…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. The due date time automatically populates as 12:00 p.m., or to your current time when adding steps to a workflow. I want the ability to bulk adjust the time for every step in a task. For example, on our team, most of us quit working around 5 p.m. CST - so I want to be able to make the time 5 p.m. for all steps within a task. Having to change each one is tedious, and often steps will show up as "overdue" in my queue when I really have until the end of the day to complete them.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. A true unpublish option would be a huge asset to the CMS. If that's not possible (or at least not possible soon, then the ability to schedule an end to expiration should work.
    It might sound like a small thing, but being able to unpublish and then schedule for republishing can be the difference between a couple of clicks and rebuilding an entire page (or pages, if you're very unlucky. In the current system, if something needs to be pulled off the site you have to expire it. But if you want to put it back up at a specific…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?