Skip to content

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

13 results found

  1. Currently, in the PaaS CMS, with Blocks, there is a Quick Edit option on the context menu when you click on a block in a content area. The opens a modal that allows the author to edit the block right there, and even publish, without having to load a whole new page in the CMS. This is nice because it allows for much quicker editing.

    We sometimes have cases where a project wants to store a lot of information with each image. More than just a title and copyright. They would like to be able to use Quick Edit on…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Integration and preproduction environments are sometimes protected by IP-whitelists and in those cases the warmup step always fails with status code 401. The warmup system waits for about 15 minutes until these requests time out. This increases delivery times to these environments specially when CI/CD is set up.

    Ex:
    2026-03-10 12:40:24 Information Starting to warm up the targets slots...
    2026-03-10 12:40:25 Information Preparing target slot for Go Live (<masked>/slot) (warming up the slot)
    2026-03-10 12:52:21 Warning Timed out waiting for all instances for webapp <masked> and slot "slot" to become ready!
    2026-03-10 12:52:21 Information Validating deployment ID uniqueness between slots…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. I've been burned a few times by publishing content on the wrong environment, e.g. publishing a change in a test page on Integration only to learn I was actually on Production. Woops!

    And it's not just me. I know of times our clients have done this, and other members of our team.

    Can I suggest some sort of UI indicator (other than just the URL) to indicate which environment you're on?

    • Maybe you could output the name of the environment in the header?
    • Maybe you could you update the 'Publish Changes' button to read 'Publish Changes to {ENVIRONMENT}'?
    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  2 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. I am a Technical Support Engineer submitting this feedback on behalf of a customer. The customer is using Optimizely CMS and relies on Optimizely Graph to synchronize content between the CMS and the search index.

    Currently, the CMS shows synchronization status only under the Options menu. The text labels such as "Not changed since last publish" or "Synchronize with Optimizely Graph" are not visually prominent. Editors cannot quickly determine whether a page is already synchronized, out of sync, or requires re-synchronization. This makes it difficult for editors to know the current state of content without navigating menus.

    The customer suggests…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Graph  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. I would like to use the newer WebApplicationBuilder / IHostApplicationBuilder introduced in .NET 6 to initialize the CMS instead of the .NET Core 3 method of using IHostBuilder, because .NET Aspire does not support IHostBuilder. The ConfigureCmsDefaults method does not support WebApplicationBuilder, and even though the following code will compile, the CMS is not usable:

    var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
    builder.Host.ConfigureCmsDefaults();

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Implementation  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. We need to configure roles in Optimizely to grant specific users permission to use the Import and Export functionality.

    Access must be restricted based on the users’ assigned business units. For example, if a user is assigned access only to Asteco, they should be able to perform import and export activities strictly within the business units (e.g., Asteco and Pactive) aligned with their permissions.

    Users must not have visibility of or access to any other projects beyond their assigned business units.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Export / Import  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. We’ve received reports from our users regarding confusion when exporting form submissions.

    Currently, when users click the header “select all” checkbox, the label shows:
    “All 25 posts are selected.”

    Because only 25 submissions are initially loaded, the checkbox correctly selects only these items. However, users often interpret this label as indicating that all existing submissions (e.g., all 69) have been selected - even though the remaining items have not yet been loaded via lazy loading. This misunderstanding has led to incorrect or incomplete exports.

    To reduce user confusion and better reflect what is selected, we would like to request an…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Forms  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Real-time audiences can be synced from ODP to CMS via a NuGet package (https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/optimizely-data-platform/docs/odp-cms). This enables audiences created in ODP to become selectable in the CMS's Audiences setting.

    The CMS's Audiences setting doesn't take account of cookie consent configurations at all, however. This creates a problem for configuring personalization in the CMS with synced ODP audiences.

    ODP audiences may opt out of personalization in their cookie consent preferences. But if personalization is configured in the CMS, the personalized view will still display for those who have opted out.

    (This is not an issue with Web Experimentation, as Web…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Personalization  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. We have used a link field of type URL to page/external address on content blocks. But When we are are adding the content with an external link then there is no option available to the that link into a new window.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Implementation  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Product manager, would like to be able to export a list of all users in specific groups under group access, and generically all users that have access to our CMS along with what their role is, what groups they are a part of.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Export / Import  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Our editors often use the sites menu in the OPE mode to switch pages and the menu is built so it uses the editmode link in OPE mode and the normal link in view mode to accomodate this.

    When clicking a menu item in episerver 11, the page is loaded more or less at once, but in episerver 12 the page is first loaded in view mode and then reloaded in edit mode. This happens with all the links in the menu.

    The editors find this very irritating. We haven't been able to figure out why that happens.

    I tried…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. When not using 'power paste' options from TinyMCE, and you copy formatted information from a Microsoft Word document, you get the "Paste formatting options" popup that asks if you want to Remove or Keep the format (view screenshot). Currently, it is possible to remove this popup by using the confirmation ".RemovePlugin("epi-paste");", but the default and only option when the popup is gone is to keep formatting.

    This request is to give an option to change the default value when removing it, between "Keep formatting" and "Remove formatting", and not forcing into always keeping formatting.

    Thank you,

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. We need capability when we are creating content for a new language version for a page, from master language draft content also along with published content should be available, Currently only either published language version or draft version can be added but not both.

    We are using EPiServer.Labs.LanguageManager add on to create new language content.

    Can this add on EPiServer.Labs.LanguageManager be extended to provide this option.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Translations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?