Skip to content

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

41 results found

  1. We upgraded to CMS13 recently, and found that the package EpiServer.Forms.Samples is not upgraded yet. Since we use recaptcha this is blocking all our forms.

    Can EpiServer.Forms.Samples be upgraded to support cms13?

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Forms  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. My team who use the PIM product brought the new color palette change to my attention. The color is abrasive and makes spending time in the application unpleasant. What were useful color cues on the product page have become monochromatic scales that are easily lost on a design that doesn't seem to have been vetted for usability in any way. I suspect the color design doesn't meet WCAG in any way.

    While the branding is strong, we are already captured customers, and usability is our key concern. Please offer a way to revert or select an alternate color scheme.

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. We are indexing custom entities to a custom source in Graph (that is, to a source named something other than "default").

    Since the editor UI for synonyms and "Pinned results" defaults to the "default" source behind the scenes (it does not allow you to specify any other source), it is impossible for our customer to use the synonyms or "Pinned results" features within our custom source.

    We want a source-dropdown in the synonyms UI and the "Pinned results" UI. See attached image for an example.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Graph  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. As a development team managing multiple lower environments, we want API/PowerShell endpoints to orchestrate the full copy-back workflow, including a mechanism to run registered post-copy maintenance scripts, so that I can automate environment refresh end-to-end without manual PaaS Portal interaction.

    Currently, the copy-back workflow requires manual steps in the PaaS Portal (stop environment, copy databases/blobs from Production, start environment). After the copy, teams must anonymise PII from the copied databases to comply with GDPR before the environment can be used. This anonymisation step cannot be triggered or orchestrated through the platform.

    We would like the EpiCloud module or REST API…

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Add support to see actual graphlql queries in Search Management/Performance view. Now it shows only names of the queries.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Graph  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Reviewers lack visibility into where blocks and media objects are used across the site, unless someone published the landing page/parent block where the block is supposed to be placed. This lead to time-consuming searches and uncertainty during approval.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Location of Settings in CMS 12: Difficulty locating the "Automatic published media on upload" setting in CMS 12, which affects workflow and publishing behavior.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Media Publishing Confusion: Contributors often forget to publish or submit new/updated media (e.g., PDFs, images) for review, as the system does not prompt them, resulting in drafts being left unapproved. 

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Page‑level updates are not reflected in version history:
    When a block on a page is updated, the page‑level version history does not show the recent change. Instead, version history is tracked only at the block level, not for the page as a whole. As a result, it can appear that a page has not been updated even when changes have been made.

    For example the Child Health Policy Accelerator | SickKids page was updated couple of days ago, but the last update details are showing of October 2025.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. As a content editor,
    I want to search for existing blocks within the “Select Content” shortcut window, so that I can quickly find and reuse the required content without manually browsing through multiple options.

    Background / Problem Statement:

    Currently, when creating a new block in Optimizely CMS, users are presented with two options:
    Create a new block
    Select content

    When selecting “Select Content”, a shortcut window opens displaying available blocks. However, this window lacks a search functionality, making it difficult and time-consuming to locate specific content, especially when the number of blocks is large.

    Navigation Path:

    Main Content → Select…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. In Optimizely SaaS CMS there is no way to create an instance of a custom folder content type (a content type based on the folder / _folder base type) inside a shared block through the CMS UI. The New Folder action creates only the built-in system folder type and offers no picker to choose a custom folder type. Separately, the New Folder action is currently not working at all in this context. As a result, custom folder instances can only be created via the Content Management REST API or Opal.

    Steps to reproduce:

    1. Define a content type based on the…
    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. I've been burned a few times by publishing content on the wrong environment, e.g. publishing a change in a test page on Integration only to learn I was actually on Production. Woops!

    And it's not just me. I know of times our clients have done this, and other members of our team.

    Can I suggest some sort of UI indicator (other than just the URL) to indicate which environment you're on?

    • Maybe you could output the name of the environment in the header?
    • Maybe you could you update the 'Publish Changes' button to read 'Publish Changes to {ENVIRONMENT}'?
    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  3 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. As a content author and administrator, I would like a more user friendly way for legal or compliance reviews for updated pages. One where, if enabled, that approval step can give them a view similar to external content review and add comments on specific parts of the pages, and those comments in the markup would get added to the page comments for auditing. This makes it easier for our review team to view drafts without having to go to every single new block with individual feedback.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Approval & Collaboration  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. As an administrator, I'd like to be able to set up an approval sequence with a toggle option to skip workflows for minor changes that do not require review. This would allow small changes or quick edits that don't require a compliance review to be published with a comment to justify the action for audits. Otherwise, even small changes such as a typo fixes or urgent changes goes through reviews unless an admin makes the update, which may not be feasible at the time of the change and cause bottlenecks.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Approval & Collaboration  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. We want to be able to deploy ‘Google Tag Gateway’ in Cloudflare which is not currently supported in DXP. This gets the Google tags to appear as first-party. The tag setup in GTM is otherwise the same and it should still obey the OneTrust cookie consent.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Integration / APIs  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. We see Bynder images that are marked as archived on Bynder, in our SaaS CMS. Could it be possible to filter or prevent these images from showing in the CMS?
    Also is it possible to get warning that images is archived if it is used in the CMS?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Integration / APIs  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Max file size exceeded error.

    For Aldar.com there are multiple sub pages. Breaking them to smaller chunks will increase the time for export and import. With the below scenario don't you think it is time consuming? So, expecting a solution to increase the max file size for upload.

    Example:
    Initially, we need to migrate to the home node Aldar.com .
    Then we need to take all the subpages separately.
    News and Announcements / Blogs have 50+ items to take them as a smaller chunk separately.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Export / Import  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Summary

    The HTTP QUERY method (RFC 10008) provides a standardized way to perform safe, idempotent query operations while allowing a request body, addressing a long-standing limitation of GET.

    https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc10008/

    https://tykok.medium.com/the-new-http-method-query-d1dc3efc35c4

    While ASP.NET Core applications can implement support for QUERY, developers deploying to Optimizely DXP also depend on the surrounding platform and infrastructure.

    Request

    Could Optimizely publish official guidance regarding support for the HTTP QUERY method in DXP?

    Specifically, it would be helpful to clarify:

    • Is QUERY currently supported throughout the DXP infrastructure?
    • If not, which components prevent support (Cloudflare, WAF, load balancers, Azure App Service, proxies, etc.)?
    • Are there any…
    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. I'm a developer setting up secrets inside PaaS using App Settings and find that the "Add new secret" button is quite inconvenient when adding a different value for another environment. I'd like for adding a value for another environment than the first to be a part of the edit popup of the secret so that you don't have to repeat the secrets/settings name three times - risking to misspell it.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3
  • Don't see your idea?