Skip to content

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

48 results found

  1. There should be an option to specify the destination folder directly in the Optimizely Forms upload element. Currently, I can’t manage access rights for uploaded files stored under contentassets. Saving them to a folder under globalassets would let me set the appropriate permissions for the files separated from the Form/Upload element.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Forms  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. We upgraded to CMS13 recently, and found that the package EpiServer.Forms.Samples is not upgraded yet. Since we use recaptcha this is blocking all our forms.

    Can EpiServer.Forms.Samples be upgraded to support cms13?

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Forms  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. My team who use the PIM product brought the new color palette change to my attention. The color is abrasive and makes spending time in the application unpleasant. What were useful color cues on the product page have become monochromatic scales that are easily lost on a design that doesn't seem to have been vetted for usability in any way. I suspect the color design doesn't meet WCAG in any way.

    While the branding is strong, we are already captured customers, and usability is our key concern. Please offer a way to revert or select an alternate color scheme.

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. We are indexing custom entities to a custom source in Graph (that is, to a source named something other than "default").

    Since the editor UI for synonyms and "Pinned results" defaults to the "default" source behind the scenes (it does not allow you to specify any other source), it is impossible for our customer to use the synonyms or "Pinned results" features within our custom source.

    We want a source-dropdown in the synonyms UI and the "Pinned results" UI. See attached image for an example.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Graph  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Health checks on DXP PaaS sites - as I understand it - go via the load balancer. I understand they make a simple http request using Pingdom.

    If my DXP application is running on 5 servers and one of them is having an issue, there is a one-in-five chance that the health check's request will hit that server and flag a degradation.

    Can the health check strategy be broadened to monitor the health of every instance and trigger an alert when any of them is failing?

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. As a development team managing multiple lower environments, we want API/PowerShell endpoints to orchestrate the full copy-back workflow, including a mechanism to run registered post-copy maintenance scripts, so that I can automate environment refresh end-to-end without manual PaaS Portal interaction.

    Currently, the copy-back workflow requires manual steps in the PaaS Portal (stop environment, copy databases/blobs from Production, start environment). After the copy, teams must anonymise PII from the copied databases to comply with GDPR before the environment can be used. This anonymisation step cannot be triggered or orchestrated through the platform.

    We would like the EpiCloud module or REST API…

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Add support to see actual graphlql queries in Search Management/Performance view. Now it shows only names of the queries.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Graph  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Reviewers lack visibility into where blocks and media objects are used across the site, unless someone published the landing page/parent block where the block is supposed to be placed. This lead to time-consuming searches and uncertainty during approval.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Optimizely CMS 13 should support running on .NET 11.

    Today, CMS 13 officially supports .NET 10, but attempting to run it on .NET 11 currently fails because of a breaking runtime change that results in a System.MissingMethodException.

    I have documented the current issue, including a workaround, here:
    https://www.gulla.net/en/blog/upgrading-optimizely-cms-13-from-dotnet10-to-dotnet11/

    The request is not necessarily to make .NET 11 the recommended production runtime, but to make CMS 13 compatible with it where this can be done without affecting .NET 10 support.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. I'm a developer trying to solve customer needs for sorting results from graph queries by geolocation. Sorting by geolocation is a vital part of meeting customer expectations and would be greatly appreciated to get solved as we are now performing multiple cursor queries in order to sort by a customers location.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Graph  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. When working in CMS13 it would be great to have the ability to make standard blocks shared for better governance of content and similarly the reverse; to take shared blocks and localise them (essentially using the shared block as a template and branching it off to allow customisation). We'd require the ability to easily track these content blocks over time.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Location of Settings in CMS 12: Difficulty locating the "Automatic published media on upload" setting in CMS 12, which affects workflow and publishing behavior.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Media Publishing Confusion: Contributors often forget to publish or submit new/updated media (e.g., PDFs, images) for review, as the system does not prompt them, resulting in drafts being left unapproved. 

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Page‑level updates are not reflected in version history:
    When a block on a page is updated, the page‑level version history does not show the recent change. Instead, version history is tracked only at the block level, not for the page as a whole. As a result, it can appear that a page has not been updated even when changes have been made.

    For example the Child Health Policy Accelerator | SickKids page was updated couple of days ago, but the last update details are showing of October 2025.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. As a content editor,
    I want to search for existing blocks within the “Select Content” shortcut window, so that I can quickly find and reuse the required content without manually browsing through multiple options.

    Background / Problem Statement:

    Currently, when creating a new block in Optimizely CMS, users are presented with two options:
    Create a new block
    Select content

    When selecting “Select Content”, a shortcut window opens displaying available blocks. However, this window lacks a search functionality, making it difficult and time-consuming to locate specific content, especially when the number of blocks is large.

    Navigation Path:

    Main Content → Select…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. At https://paasportal.episever.net , to see the installed dotnet --info on each environment via paasportal.
    and get an output that could look something like this,

    .NET runtimes installed:
    Microsoft.AspNetCore.App 8.0.33 [/usr/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
    Microsoft.NETCore.App 8.0.33 [/usr/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App]

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Right now there's no capability to preview all the content in a project prior to publish. It would be great if this can be considered for CMS13.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. In Optimizely SaaS CMS there is no way to create an instance of a custom folder content type (a content type based on the folder / _folder base type) inside a shared block through the CMS UI. The New Folder action creates only the built-in system folder type and offers no picker to choose a custom folder type. Separately, the New Folder action is currently not working at all in this context. As a result, custom folder instances can only be created via the Content Management REST API or Opal.

    Steps to reproduce:

    1. Define a content type based on the…
    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. I've been burned a few times by publishing content on the wrong environment, e.g. publishing a change in a test page on Integration only to learn I was actually on Production. Woops!

    And it's not just me. I know of times our clients have done this, and other members of our team.

    Can I suggest some sort of UI indicator (other than just the URL) to indicate which environment you're on?

    • Maybe you could output the name of the environment in the header?
    • Maybe you could you update the 'Publish Changes' button to read 'Publish Changes to {ENVIRONMENT}'?
    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  3 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. As a content author and administrator, I would like a more user friendly way for legal or compliance reviews for updated pages. One where, if enabled, that approval step can give them a view similar to external content review and add comments on specific parts of the pages, and those comments in the markup would get added to the page comments for auditing. This makes it easier for our review team to view drafts without having to go to every single new block with individual feedback.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Approval & Collaboration  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3
  • Don't see your idea?