Skip to content

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

18 results found

  1. When there are issues with the servicebus it is not possible to see what went wrong many times. You can go to the servicebus and look at the graph and see that there are "server errors" and "user errors" and "throttled messages"but there is no way to see the details of the server errors or the user errors.
    Some times we can see a log entry in the CMS logs but not always and I guess it depends on the type of error.
    If we had more information it would help when troubleshooting customers having problems with the servicebus.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Upon uploading to a task there is no indication on whether or not content is a duplicate of what exists in the DAM. If it can not be indicated upon import, then can a warning implemented when attempting to save a duplicate to the DAM?

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Export / Import  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. I've been burned a few times by publishing content on the wrong environment, e.g. publishing a change in a test page on Integration only to learn I was actually on Production. Woops!

    And it's not just me. I know of times our clients have done this, and other members of our team.

    Can I suggest some sort of UI indicator (other than just the URL) to indicate which environment you're on?

    • Maybe you could output the name of the environment in the header?
    • Maybe you could you update the 'Publish Changes' button to read 'Publish Changes to {ENVIRONMENT}'?
    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  2 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. I would like to use the newer WebApplicationBuilder / IHostApplicationBuilder introduced in .NET 6 to initialize the CMS instead of the .NET Core 3 method of using IHostBuilder, because .NET Aspire does not support IHostBuilder. The ConfigureCmsDefaults method does not support WebApplicationBuilder, and even though the following code will compile, the CMS is not usable:

    var builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
    builder.Host.ConfigureCmsDefaults();

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Implementation  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. This is essentially a copy of https://feedback.optimizely.com/forums/964806-commerce-connect/suggestions/51196846-dxp-support-for-alerts and with same intent for all services hosted on the DXP platform.

    The scenario for usage is to add monitoring to be able to react swiftly on production issues and support our partner customers.

    This gives both us partners and Optimizely more rapid enviroment insights which results in more stable environments and happy end users and thereby customers.

    Some examples to mention a few scenarios:
    Response times in checkout
    High error rates
    Failing external calls
    Slow response times external services
    Slow response times servers
    Failing endpoints
    Asp.net core threading issues
    High cpu on…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Media Publishing Confusion: Contributors often forget to publish or submit new/updated media (e.g., PDFs, images) for review, as the system does not prompt them, resulting in drafts being left unapproved. 

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Page‑level updates are not reflected in version history:
    When a block on a page is updated, the page‑level version history does not show the recent change. Instead, version history is tracked only at the block level, not for the page as a whole. As a result, it can appear that a page has not been updated even when changes have been made.

    For example the Child Health Policy Accelerator | SickKids page was updated couple of days ago, but the last update details are showing of October 2025.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Reviewers lack visibility into where blocks and media objects are used across the site, unless someone published the landing page/parent block where the block is supposed to be placed. This lead to time-consuming searches and uncertainty during approval.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. We need to configure roles in Optimizely to grant specific users permission to use the Import and Export functionality.

    Access must be restricted based on the users’ assigned business units. For example, if a user is assigned access only to Asteco, they should be able to perform import and export activities strictly within the business units (e.g., Asteco and Pactive) aligned with their permissions.

    Users must not have visibility of or access to any other projects beyond their assigned business units.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Export / Import  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Location of Settings in CMS 12: Difficulty locating the "Automatic published media on upload" setting in CMS 12, which affects workflow and publishing behavior.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. We’ve received reports from our users regarding confusion when exporting form submissions.

    Currently, when users click the header “select all” checkbox, the label shows:
    “All 25 posts are selected.”

    Because only 25 submissions are initially loaded, the checkbox correctly selects only these items. However, users often interpret this label as indicating that all existing submissions (e.g., all 69) have been selected - even though the remaining items have not yet been loaded via lazy loading. This misunderstanding has led to incorrect or incomplete exports.

    To reduce user confusion and better reflect what is selected, we would like to request an…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Forms  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. It would be great if we could configure an IP Address whitelist in Cloudflare so that we only allow a specific set of source IP Addresses to be allowed to access our DXP instances. This will allow us to block public access to non-production environments

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Our content editors rely on thumbnails in the Media Panel to identify images. However, the current view makes this difficult, as the thumbnails are too small. While it is possible to open each image to view it in full size, this process is inconvenient and time-consuming. Providing larger thumbnails would make image identification much easier and more efficient.

    Suggestion: Provide an option to enlarge thumbnails for better visibility.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Media / Asset Management  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. We have used a link field of type URL to page/external address on content blocks. But When we are are adding the content with an external link then there is no option available to the that link into a new window.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Implementation  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Product manager, would like to be able to export a list of all users in specific groups under group access, and generically all users that have access to our CMS along with what their role is, what groups they are a part of.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Export / Import  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Our editors often use the sites menu in the OPE mode to switch pages and the menu is built so it uses the editmode link in OPE mode and the normal link in view mode to accomodate this.

    When clicking a menu item in episerver 11, the page is loaded more or less at once, but in episerver 12 the page is first loaded in view mode and then reloaded in edit mode. This happens with all the links in the menu.

    The editors find this very irritating. We haven't been able to figure out why that happens.

    I tried…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. When not using 'power paste' options from TinyMCE, and you copy formatted information from a Microsoft Word document, you get the "Paste formatting options" popup that asks if you want to Remove or Keep the format (view screenshot). Currently, it is possible to remove this popup by using the confirmation ".RemovePlugin("epi-paste");", but the default and only option when the popup is gone is to keep formatting.

    This request is to give an option to change the default value when removing it, between "Keep formatting" and "Remove formatting", and not forcing into always keeping formatting.

    Thank you,

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. We need capability when we are creating content for a new language version for a page, from master language draft content also along with published content should be available, Currently only either published language version or draft version can be added but not both.

    We are using EPiServer.Labs.LanguageManager add on to create new language content.

    Can this add on EPiServer.Labs.LanguageManager be extended to provide this option.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Translations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?