Skip to content

CMP (Content Marketing Platform)

CMP (Content Marketing Platform)

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

115 results found

  1. When using smart durations and adjusting a step, we'd like the option to adjust dates AFTER a step only -- everything before the step being adjusted remains the same.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. In the board view within planning, the cards (tasks) does not have the option to show their current status (Not Started, In Progress, etc). This does not allow the team to quickly see what status the tasks have.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. · In review - work is completed and under stakeholder or QA review
    · In rework - feedback was received and updates are underway

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. It would be great if we could have different privacy or permission options for content on tasks. I can see this helping in a number of different scenarios. For example, there are times where we want to use CMP for internal reviews or sharing but don't want the entire project team to be able to access content and often times end up hopping in and out of other tools and programs to achieve this.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. It would be amazing if there were an option to multi-select from a task's content section for updating things like asset expiration dates, instead of having to select each item 1 by 1.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Provide Asset History in the DAM/Library, similar to the History in a Task. It is important to be able to see a log of what has been done to the asset, whether it was moved, a URL was generated, etc.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. When creating a TASK from a WRQ which has Attachments, these are NOT pulled over to the Task´s Attachments which seems counterintuitive as the Creative Assets are pulled over from WRQ (Creative Assets) into the Task´s Content tab. This means extra manual work for users who are annoyed why this is not working if it works for Creative Assets field (but not all files for a WRQ are necessarily creative assets). Would be great to see it harmonised. Thanks so much

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Should be able to select multiple activities underneath a campaign and bulk edit information - fields, deletion, archive, etc.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. At this time, the filters search all assets, regardless of the folder they are in. Ciena would like the ability to filter within a specific folder

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Ciena needs the ability to filter into specific Workflow Steps in the Plan view.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. When it comes to replies, we always have to tag users even if you are replying to a comment from that person. If you reply to someones comment and you dont tag them, they don't even get notified, which is odd as you're replying directly to their comment.

    It would be great if this could be updated so that it recognizes the people that were previously tagged, or who you are replying to. It's a bit tedious to always have to tag the same group of people.

    We do love the feature to reply to comments from your outlook inbox,…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. As a CMP Admin, the interface of admin center is complex. It will be helpful if the roles and teams are bifurcated differently and not as one under the role module. The nomenclature is confusing, and all items are housed under one section. For example group access - the instances for sandbox and production should be put in such a way so that it is easier to locate information, rather then getting lost with too much clutter.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Describe the challenge:
    Since there is no time frame assigned to a task type when entering a request, the requester can make up any due date for any request great or small. Requesters are entering physically impossible turnaround times that are beyond realistic.

    What impact is this challenge having?:
    Have to go back to the requester and tell them how long the project is actually going to take and explain the overall process timeline including the proofing process. Need to do this on most requests, which is north of 20 times a day and takes up way too much time.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Describe the challenge:
    After a WRQ is accepted and converted into a task, seemingly the requester is not automatically assigned to task. They continue to reference and even add more comments into the WRQ form, instead of in the active task.

    What impact is this challenge having?:
    By referencing and adding more comments into the WRQ form that has already been converted active task is confusing and time consuming. We have to use the job title to cross reference the TSK w/ the WRQ request. Then add and instruct them to the active task, along with the inforamtion their where…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Describe the challenge:
    Important information being shared by the requester within the comments of the WRQ request does not migrate into the accepted task. Which means I have to copy and paste any pertinent information over manually.

    What impact is this challenge having?:
    It is time consuming to manually add information from multiple comments from one WRQ into the TSK brief of the same project. There is no room for error if details are missed.

    What does good look like?:
    All comments from the WRQ would migrate into the accepted task, saving time and miscommunication.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. While we appreciate that multiple files can be uploaded at once to a Task, we miss an option to download ALL files from Content or Attachments of a Task. Imagine you have to download individually 20 files provided by the Task Creator, in order to process the Task (e.g. set up a Social Paid, Webpage Display Ads, ...). This takes quite some time and users wonder it´s not possible to download all - like form an email.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. It would be really convenient if there were an option to multi-select or download all attachments from within the comments of a request - as opposed to opening each individual preview and downloading 1 by 1.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Marketing Manager who often gets asked to add new steps to multiple tasks - would be helpful if adding the step to the template and it updated new and existing tasks using that template

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. I want to be able to delete the start date on the Plan timeline view after I've entered and saved one

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?