356 results found
-
Product Feedback: Multi-Select Steps
requester mishee.kurpinski@optimizely.com
Type of issue: Feature Request
Mishee Kurpinski sent a feedback.
Description: Hello,
It would be super helpful and efficient if we had the ability to multi-select steps within tasks and campaigns when assigning people. ?
If this is a capability we already have, I apologize in advance - I haven't been able to find resource material speaking to this nor anyone on my team familiar with this being a current option.
Thank you for all you do!
Mishee
User email: mishee.kurpinski@optimizely.com
User id: mishee.kurpinski@optimizely.com
Account: Optimizely Marketing
Account id: 8624fd14-7f6d-462d-aa7c-e231aa59f9fc2 votes -
Product Feedback: How can I attach the approved assets?
requester andra.stanciu@xerox.com
Type of issue: Feature Request
Andra Stanciu sent a feedback.
Description: How can I attach the approved assets?
User email: andra.stanciu@xerox.com
User id: andra.stanciu@xerox.com
Account: Xerox
Account id: e6712eb2-25e4-e411-9afb-0050568d2da82 votes -
Product Feedback: Help bubble positioning
requester abradbury@hunter.com
Type of issue: Feature Request
Andrea Bradbury sent a feedback.
Description: Move the help bubble to the bottom left of the screen instead of overlapping the workflow and notification bars.
Either that - or offer a way to lock it in without overlapping my typing.
User email: abradbury@hunter.com
User id: abradbury@hunter.com
Account: Hunter
Account id: 40ab6a54-8b97-e911-a966-000d3a3a3a802 votes -
Product Feedback: Template - Logic
requester sarajayne.reid@royallondon.com
Type of issue: Feature Request
Sara-Jayne Reid sent a feedback.
Description: Hi, I've created a new Template / Intake Form - "3rd Party Brand Use Request Form - For Internal Use Only".
I've added Logic into the form, which is only working for the dropdown Individual. All the options are built in the same way, but aren't working.
Can you confirm if this is a bug?
Thanks
User email: sarajayne.reid@royallondon.com
User id: sarajayne.reid@royallondon.com
Account: Brand and Marketing Pod
Account id: c78dc579-5d8d-de11-88c2-0018717a8c822 votes -
GraphQL do not include Description field, though it exist in the CMP
When request DAM files using GraphQL, the asset's schema do not include Description, though in DAM the field exist.
2 votes -
Product Feedback: make the question mark movable
requester rebecca.condello@enverus.com
Type of issue: Feature Request
Rebecca Condello sent a feedback.
Description: it's too large and in the way. it would be nice if we could move it to empty space on the left side.
User email: rebecca.condello@enverus.com
User id: rebecca.condello@enverus.com
Account: Enverus
Account id: 0da28309-f8aa-0ba9-fc7b-1bbdf76029282 votes -
Product Feedback: No save button today
requester lgc@aka.dk
Type of issue: Feature Request
Louise Christensen sent a feedback.
Description: And also: Why isn't it possible to attach a picture here? It's really frustrating, that it has to go through a ticket in a mail :/
User email: lgc@aka.dk
User id: lgc@aka.dk
Account: Akademikernes A-kasse
Account id: 218a418d-453d-e411-9f63-0050568d2da82 votes -
Easy migration of templates/fields from one instance to another
We would like to have a possibility to easily migrate templates and/or fields created in one instance (e.g., test instance to production instance. This would allow us to save a lot of time that is now spent on recreating a setup in prod that is already created in test instance.
2 votes -
Single Selection for Jump To Logic in Work Requests
When the "Jump To" logic is applied to a field in a Work Request, multiple sections appear instead of the single section that should appear for the field selected.
Example (as seen attached:
- The user clicks on 1 field value in a multiple-select dropdown list in the Work Request.
- The applicable section appears for this field value (correct
- AND sections for additional field values also appear (incorrect
Ideal State: ONLY the sections that relate to the selected fields should appear for the user.3 votes -
Indexing Assets
Hi Team,
in the December release, you have introduced option to INDEX the Assets in Library (CMP. While we appreciate the flexibility, we also can see potential risks of enabling indexing by users by an accident and making an internal corporate content to pop up in Google Search results. Hence, we would appreciate the possibility to DISABLE this option in the Admin settings.
Thanks in advance for considering this.
Best regards
Roman - Swiss Re1 vote -
Toggle on/off Holidays
Be able to turn on/off holidays from the calendar view with a toggle (like used for activity types to get a less cluttered view.
2 votes -
Make event description field rich text
When hovering over an event in the calendar, a link should be visible and clickable for easy access. If the Event description field is changed to rich text it will be possible to add a link in the description.
2 votes -
Move start and end dates after workflow selection
When creating a task, move the start and end dates to below the workflow selection since the due dates might change depending on the workflow's SLAs.
1 vote -
Confirmation to delete asset is hidden when image is associated with many CMS pages (Usage
You cannot see the "Yes, Delete" confirmation button for assets with a lot of associated webpages (Usage section. In the attached example, the image is associated with over 50 urls and I had to reduce my browser resolution to 25% to see the buttons.
Can you enable scrolling so a user can review the associated pages at normal magnification? Otherwise, please place the "Cancel" and "Yes, Delete" buttons in a more accessable location.2 votes -
Plan Module Board View - allow sorting of individual columns
In the plan module, when using the board view, the cards in a given column are sorted somehow, but it is unclear how. I can manually change the sort, but that is only for me, not other users. There needs to be a way to control the sort of these columns, even if its just by date, although context specific options would be good. But the current manual only sort is not really sustainable with a large team.
3 votes -
Product Feedback: NA Ansell.com (US and Canada & Product Page
requester dlynn.chambers@ansell.com
Type of issue: Feature Request
D'Lynn Chambers sent a feedback.
Description: JK and I approve this. Thank you.
User email: dlynn.chambers@ansell.com
User id: dlynn.chambers@ansell.com
Account: Ansell
Account id: 26c8cc0f-2e7a-3251-82c9-74c0cb6afd5d2 votes -
Have the ability to create renditions in AVIF format
AVIF is supported by all modern browsers and has a better compression rate when compared to other formats.
2 votes -
Color code search results by a designated field
We would love to be able to designate a field to color-code search results. For example, we have a "deliverable" field designating what kind of produce a task is creating. We could designate this field as the search primary so we could pick out deliverable type quickly and easily.
6 votes -
Product Feedback: Request Board Suggestion
requester mishee.kurpinski@optimizely.com
Type of issue: Feature Request
Mishee Kurpinski sent a feedback.
Description: Hello,
It would be great to be able to add a column for "task" or "campaign" to be able to see if/when we've accepted request form submissions and their corresponding task or campaign without having to click in to the request, then click the related tab, and then click to navigate to the campaign. ?
User email: mishee.kurpinski@optimizely.com
User id: mishee.kurpinski@optimizely.com
Account: Optimizely Marketing
Account id: 8624fd14-7f6d-462d-aa7c-e231aa59f9fc
https://u44077338.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/open?upn=u001.UBmjMNjeoRXVAL5fZIj9r1Ko-2FjX1lXzaxEyox10iAEAprvXOXp5OkRdqJdy0YLDBDSw2IQScwaQ2FTaXFiAXCT9b5u9kYz-2FK2mccLmaNAB7LwkTae7Zl8uRO9Khw9NPpxY0IJ0lgT-2FIit2mji8375Z-2FZkJJXTQEkABRx0yq761GQjq7woj-2FFt9qum5PripE9RCrcaC5VHyWGxNs-2B3DMUm0llndaDyASQb3OyNBz3s2FeKZN4vPs1TZvuBVGTfsSR2 votes -
Acceptance date to be included in the Request export
We want to measure the effectivness oand turnaround of work requests submitted. In order to measure more effectivly we are lacking 'acceptance date' data in the report and export. You have included sumbission and completion date so why not also acceptance date.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?