Skip to content

CMS SaaS (Content Management System)



CMS SaaS (Content Management System)

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

73 results found

  1. I'm a developer, currently using optimzely CMS SaaS. My client would like to take advantage of boosting for specifc fields in a where clause of our GraphiQL search queries. I have learned however that in Optimizely Graph, boosting can be applied only directly to fields that belong to the top level content type, such as Title, MetaDescription, or _fulltext. These properties are directly available in the GraphQL schema for the content type, which is why boosting works as expected when applied to them.

    Properties that belong to blocks placed inside a Content Area, such as the Heading property in a…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Graph  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. There should be a button (or by clicking the CDN-cache purge) that cleares/invalidates the Graph cache.
    This is especially useful (necessary) when Graph synchronization fails, as the cache is only cleared upon sync completed.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Graph  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. When setting up approval workflows to publish content, the workflow gets automatically assigned to all roles.

    However I only want to apply this review requirement to certian low level roles. I, as a Content Admin, should not have to send my own edits for review and then approve my own changes. It is multiple extra clicks, which is redundant.

    When creating an approval workflow, I should have the option to assign it to specific roles. Roles not assigned to should be exempt from the need to send for review.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Request: ability to trigger Graph indexing job programmatically

    If you update content types via import or API, my understanding is that you need to manually trigger the Optimizely Graph indexing job to sync those model changes to Graph.

    The ability to trigger that indexing job via API would enable more automated processes for introducing changes to content types to a SaaS CMS instance.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Graph  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Customers have the ability to manage CMS product details in Admin Center, including the CMS navigation URL - https://support.optimizely.com/hc/en-us/articles/28866325868301-Manage-product-details

    However, the instance name in the URL is not customizable from this customer facing feature and would require a some engineering effort. Customers have asked to update their instance names similar to their own naming standards.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Implementation  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. When a new user accesses the CMS for the first time, they must manually add the "Versions" gadget to the UI. Can we have that included by default?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. When setting content access rights for an API key, the UI should use the API key's "Name" field instead of the ID field, to make it more user-friendly.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. It would be helpful to content editors if SaaS had a validation option for text or in general where we can chose to show a warning message instead of it always being an error.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. As a developer, I want to automate the creation/update of appsettings/secrets in the DXP portal during deployment. So that I'm sure there are no mistakes introduced.
    We typically deploy our code with a pipeline in Azure DevOps. It would be nice if we could also create and update appropriate app and secrets via the Deployment API. To further automate deployments of our releases.
    There can also be settings/secrets that are sourced elsewhere, as they are multi-purposed for other applications too. We see that sometimes human interactions for setting up the keys can take awhile (if there are many. Mistakes are…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. I would like to be able to troubleshoot slot instances instead of contacting support for the log files. In the log stream you are only able to access the master slots and when appending -slot to the url it says that logging is not enabled for this site/slot.
    We had an issue with a block type which had gone from a on page property to a contentarea and a change from string to XhtmlString on one of the blocks props. I thought it was solved when removing the single instance of the block but the on page property was still…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. To restrict environments by IP requires implementing something via code:
    https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/digital-experience-platform/docs/restricting-environment-access
    This is cumbersome, especially for IP ranges. In addition it's not possible to restrict/allow by service tag - which we would also like to do.
    Our application needs to allow it's own outbound IPs that can change at any time. Relying on a code-based IP restriction means that the site could become unavailable if the outbound IPs change.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Hi Opti Team,
    We are consistently receiving feedback from our customers expressing dissatisfaction with the current availability of logs within our system.
    For context, we recently received the following response from your support team regarding log access:
    "As mentioned in the follow up ticket, the CMS system does not handle login information. You can see the last login date in [dbo].[AspNetUsers] if you use AspNetIdentity. If you use another authentication method, you will have to handle it yourself."
    This response, while technically accurate, does not provide a practical solution for our customers who require access to log data for various…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. As a web content editor, reporting on unpublished pages means better governance of the website where there are multiple editors leaving pages unpublished.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 4 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?