381 results found
-
Replies and tagging
When it comes to replies, we always have to tag users even if you are replying to a comment from that person. If you reply to someones comment and you dont tag them, they don't even get notified, which is odd as you're replying directly to their comment.
It would be great if this could be updated so that it recognizes the people that were previously tagged, or who you are replying to. It's a bit tedious to always have to tag the same group of people.
We do love the feature to reply to comments from your outlook inbox,…
2 votes -
Readability issue in Calendar View
Hi Team, when in Calendar view, the text of the Activities is always black no matter how dark the background iso the text easy hard to read. Could this be improved please? It´s really poor accessibility what we experience.
Also the Date fields are quite cumbersome after the UX update - we always have to click twice to choose a date (typing the date does not work always for us). We would really appreciate an improvement here, e.g. to be able to switch the grid from days do months and years. Not being a UX expert but I believe this…
1 vote -
Request/Briefing Form Templates: Field Groups in Request Forms (modular sections)
The ability to add field groups to multiple form templates allows modularity and easier form maintenance.
Currently, you can create 'Field Groups', but this only applies to Library asset management.
If it was possible to create a named field group and then add that field group to one or more form templates, this would save time and allow updating the 'field group' from within the fields tab of the CMPs back-end - automatically updating the field group across all form templates.
1 vote -
Request/Briefing Form Templates: Ability to add hidden, pre-filled fields
When creating form templates, I need to add fields that are hidden and pre-defined/selected so the requester doesn't see them, but they get added to their request. (In an ideal world, if some logic could be applied to them - e.g., if the user selects this field: choose X value for hidden field, else: choose Y).
For example, if people fill in the 'Email' form, I would like to add the field 'emailField1' with the value True pre-selected. This means the user doesn't have to fill it in each time and it allows us to use the field for planning…
1 vote -
Overwrite Asset via Drag and Drop without Versions
Would like to upload an asset to overwrite an existing asset immediately instead of going through creating versions as this is VERY time consuming. Basically like drag and drop in Windows Explorer, where drag and drop and it asks if you want to replace the file or not.
1 vote -
Efficiency Dashboards: Ordering Chart Values
The ability to reorder efficiency dashboard results (either by manually selecting and adjusting the order) or by ordering them with logic [high to low & vice versa, alphabetical (A-Z & Z-A), latest dates first, etc]?
1 vote -
Content Preview Does Not Indicate Annotations
In the content tab, the Preview shows content that has been uploaded - but if annotations/edits are made, there is no indication of this from the Preview screen. One must go into the editing/markup menu in order to see comments that have been left. It would be helpful to end-users if they could see a notification similar to "comments have been left on this content" from the Preview screen.
3 votes -
notification - admins ability to configure content/fields on notification templates
Our team is inundated with notifications - this has gotten to the point where everyone turns them off and we miss important updates on projects. If there was a way for an admin to configure what fields show on the notification email template we could GREATLY improve the notification feature to where it is actually usable/actionable. For example: on a 'new work request' notification, as an admin if I could configure all 'new work request' notifications to include some of the WRQ fields for improved understanding how urgent / who needs to review like 'template' 'priority' in addition to the…
1 vote -
Enable Multi Region Support for Business Calendar
Most clients are global companies, and need to have regional support for holidays and working days (e.g. Friday/Sat vs Sat/Sun)
2 votes -
Allow more field types to be used for filtering
Allow "Date" type fields to be searchable in the left-hand filter - not just labels, dropdowns, etc.
3 votes -
Use Calendar as an Overall Planning Tool
Role:
AdminIssue:
We are currently unable to filter by events/campaigns going live during a certain time frame.Desired Outcome:
We'd like the ability to filter content calendar by launch or event dates happening within a specific month1 vote -
Add the Ability for Admins to Customize campaign Titles
Role:
AdminIssue:
There are currently three campaigns types in Optimizely CMP, which effectively act like (1) a main "parent" campaign, (2) a sub-campaign, and (3) a third-level campaign. In the system, they are all titled and referred to as 'campaign.'We'd like to be able to customize these titles so they are differentiated for users. So Campaign might still be the name of the first tier, but we'd like to call the second level a 'sub-campaign..' and the third-tier could be something else like, 'marketing initiative.'
Impact:
By creating these differing names, users will better understand the hierarchy in…1 vote -
Allow Basic Text Editor for Help Text Authoring
Role: Admin
Issue:
Currently, when authoring help text, there is no way to add a hyperlink.
Desired Outcome:
We'd like to be able to open up a simple WYSIWYG dialogue for Help Text that will allow a link title to be authored. If possible, we'd also like to have the option to bold, underline, and italicize text.Impact:
Currently, teams are not able to share critical information (that's in the form of a PDF or webpage) with users because there is no way to author this in Help Text.1 vote -
Ability for admins to create a field within the Workflow configuration area
Role:
AdminIssue: We'd like the ability to create a new field during workflow configuration, like what's avaialble in the Work Request dialogue.
Currently, while authoring a workflow a user has to leave the entire workflow dialogue and go to the fields area to create a new field. Then the must come BACK to the worfklow to add the new field there.
We'd like to havee the option to create AND ADD a new field right there in the workflow dialogue
1 vote -
Add durations to Sub-Steps
Role:
AdminIssue:
At the moment, there is no way to document SLAs for sub-steps. We'd like to be able to do this in the same way that it is done for whole steps.1 vote -
Remove Padding in Work Request
Role: Admin
Issue:
There appears to be a significant amount of padding between fields and text. Oftentimes, we need to use the text option to explain a field because there is a character limit on help text. So we're using the text feature to explain what ought to be in help text.1 vote -
Remove Character Limits on Help Text
We'd love to be able to remove the character limits for Help Text.. Currently, the help text limit is 120 characters, and most teams need more space than this to explain their ask.
1 vote -
Remove elipses from Checkbox items
Role: Admin
Issue:
When creating a field using the Checkbox function, all options in the field are limited to a certain character limit before an elipses appears. We'd like to remove those ellipsis.Expected Outcome:
No ellipses appears on any options authored in Checkboxes.1 vote -
Allow conditional/branching logic in workflows
Add logic to fields in workflows/task forms: A way to have the dropdown options trigger a sub-dropdown list with items that are only applicable to the item selected in the first dropdown.
This functionality already exists in Work Requests.
For example, we need to know if your dog barks at night, but only if you chose dog in the "Do you have a dog or cat?" field. Cat owners shouldn't have to respond to the question about barking since it's not relevant.
1 vote -
required
Role: Admin
Issue:
In Work Request, if there are ANY fields in the form that are required, then everyone has to fill out that field (even if they would've skipped that field due to logic authored in a previous field.) We need a way to make only certain fields required for certain responders so that we segregate who has to answer certain questions.Expected Outcome:
When authoring a work request, and logic is applied to certain fields, only those who logically land on that field should be required to fill it out.1 vote
- Don't see your idea?