Skip to content

CMP (Content Marketing Platform)

CMP (Content Marketing Platform)

Categories

504 results found

  1. As a user I need to have the ability to approve workflow tasks assigned to me on Email, without logging into CMP.

    Other workflow tools like Asana /ServiceNow let you do that.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. I love the Efficiency Dashboards feature and have heard from a lot of clients that they appreciate the ability to see how long it took to complete a task or the lead time for steps. However, what would take this one step further is if we show the lead time for a step vs. how long that step was supposed to take or the completion time for a task vs. how long that task was mean to take. It will help put the data in context for a lot of customers.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. It is currently not possible to filter or pivot by Template name in the Request card in the efficiency dashboard, which makes this card very difficult to use.

    As different teams are using different templates, or each template is for a specific use case, having the ability to filter and pivot by the template name would greatly improve the usability of this card.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. A user received a work request for a campaign that already exists. They accepted the work request and linked it to the task that already exists within the campaign. Ideally, this would bring across the brief from the work request. However, it did not but we know that this works when you create a new task within an existing campaign. So can it also do this for existing tasks with a campaign?

    Please see example campaign below.
    Steps are:

    Go to Work request 239 which has a Brief in it and link that WRQ to Task-673.

    Now go to tsk-673…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. It would be great if we had the ability to multi-select items from the content tab of a task to complete repeated actions.

    For example if we need to delete items from the content tab after copying a task (since everything pulls over, I can't seem to find an option to de-select content from carrying over). It's extremely tedious and time consuming especially on tasks with larger numbers of content (sometimes well over 80 items)

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. It would be incredibly helpful to allow admins to customize the default task statuses beyond the current fixed options: Not Started, In Progress, Completed, and On Hold.

    Many teams use more nuanced workflows that require additional stages (e.g., In Review, Approved, Blocked, Needs Revisions, Ready for Publishing, etc.). Without the ability to tailor default statuses:

    • Teams are limited in how accurately they can reflect their actual processes.

    • Reporting and dashboards become less precise because tasks often end up forced into statuses that don’t match reality.

    • Teams have to rely on workarounds (like creating separate fields to mimic status) which adds…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. It would be extremely helpful to have the ability to modify a field’s type after it has been created (e.g., switching a field from Text to Dropdown, Dropdown to Multi-select, etc.).

    Right now, if a field is initially set up with the wrong type or needs to evolve as workflows mature, the only option is to create a brand-new field. This creates several challenges:

    • Existing tasks and content items lose continuity because the new field doesn’t retain historical data.

    • Reporting becomes fragmented across multiple versions of essentially the same field.

    • It increases admin overhead, especially when managing large or complex…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. We would like members of teams to be able to archive assets in a folder, whilst not having permissions to delete the asset.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Marketing Managers interested in the ability to open tabs within CMP so we can compare tasks and not have to open another tab within the browser.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Marketing Managers who would like the ability to pin comments to the top of comment sections during PDF circulation

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. We have A LOT of Workflows set up on our instance. We need to be able to find workflows in huge long lists of workflows with similar names, which can be hard to do if they have the same prefix/similar names.

    Ideally we would be able to:

    • Restrict access/visibility of some workflows by User/Team so they don't appear in drop-downs
    • Filter/sort workflows when they are presented in the UI
    • Display the whole name of the workflow in the UI (or on mouseover) as opposed to truncating it so they all look the same after the first "x" characters
    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Adding to the raft of new Dashboard cards in CMP, it would be very useful to have an overview of all the assets which were coming up for expiry, filterable by owner and how soon the expire.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. All of the assets in our Asset Library are added via Task. As such, the new Dashboard widget for showing uploaded assets doesn't give us any information, as it only reports on assets uploaded directly.

    Can this widget be updated (fixed!) to include assets added via a task, or enhanced so the option to filter by how the asset was added is available?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. We started to use Work Requests for managing intake of the marketing requests. The standard field "Deliverable Due Date" is obviously the essential one on all forms.

    Issue:
    Due Dates often change during the delivery but this is not possible to change in the Requests so many times they get overview. Why not to have the WRQ fields editable?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Add functionality to allow view only access to all users. This will allow those not assigned to work requests to see them for the sake of awareness.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. It would be amazing if there were an option to multi-select from a task's content section for updating things like asset expiration dates, instead of having to select each item 1 by 1.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Provide Asset History in the DAM/Library, similar to the History in a Task. It is important to be able to see a log of what has been done to the asset, whether it was moved, a URL was generated, etc.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 8 10 12 25 26
  • Don't see your idea?