Skip to content

Feature Experimentation

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

56 results found

  1. Depending on the number of teams operating in FX, tech debt accumulates quickly if not managed. Help customers determine how and when to consider tech debt in their FX endeavors.

    Some customers struggle with outdated flags that have not been used in a while, but it is hard for them to determine which ones are outdated.

    Help customers understand how their users are reacting to a new feature rollout.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  3 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Clients wants to be able to have an approval workflow before a flag or test is started. They do this because they want to ensure that someone needs to get approval before changing the configuration of a flag to ensure a second pair of eyes before changes are made (similar to approving code changes.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. As a web developer I need to ensure that every point in a request lifecycle uses the same version of an Optimizely datafile to ensure a page is rendered correctly. This includes:
    * edge function logic
    * serverside render
    * clientside hydration
    If there is a mismatch in Optimizely datafile versions between edge function logic and serverside render, then the incorrect decision could be used to generate a page that is saved into the CDN cache. If there is a mismatch in Optimizely datafile versions between the serverside render and the clientside hydration, then hydration mismatch bugs will occur.
    Optimizely's…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. When the platform says another 50k users to reach significance, could a date be added? E.g. it has taken 3 weeks to get to 25k so give the date in 3 weeks as the date when the 50k will be reached

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Add a "status changed" date to the FX Flags overview page. Because currently, there is a "created" and "modified" column. However, "Modified" refers to any changes, and there is no easy way to see when a status was changed, so when a rule was changed to its current state (started/paused/concluded)... it would be valuable information for the customer just within the FX UI.

    Additional context: https://jira.sso.episerver.net/browse/DHK-2914?focusedId=2087943&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-2087943

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. As a developer I want to be able to use an Optimizely provider for the CNCF OpenFeature project so that I don't have to learn a vendor-specific SDK to integrate my codebase with Optimizely resulting in faster adoption of Optimizely in my applications

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. As a rule administrator in feature experimentation, I want to be able to move a single rule between environments without have to copy all rules from one environment to another and having those all reset to draft in the target environment.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Problem:
    Currently, the search function in Optimizely Experimentation only filters by a single word, even if multiple words are entered. For example, if a user searches for “Headers for PDP”, the results only return matches for “Headers”. This limits discoverability and forces users to rely on entering very specific single keywords.

    Proposed Solution:
    Update the search functionality to apply all words entered in the query, rather than restricting results to the first word only. This way, users can perform both broad and specific searches as needed.

    Reasoning / Business Impact:
    For customers running numerous tests, Efficiently searching and reviewing experiments…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. In order to support testing of more complicated experiments that require server side code changes, in tandem with experiment JS/CSS changes, please allow the changing of a project target URL without deleting all the experiment changes.

    RapidX already has the ability to do this (they have a button that can bypass the change deletion behavior), meaning the use case is valid and the code has already been written. I'm not sure if it's an oversight or if there is a justifiable design reason why customers cannot do the same.

    Since we control both the experiment change selectors and the server…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. I would like the ability to create folders within projects to organize our work. This would allow users to organize work by developer or by area of the site.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. To enable FX personalization, be able to pull audiences from other tools.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Similar to Optimizely Web, capture basic segmentation (browser, device, ...) out of the box.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  SDKs  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. requester jake.schlack@dat.com

    Type of issue: Feature Experimentation
    Jake Schlack sent a feedback.
    Description: Good afternoon,
    My team and I would like to run an A/B test that measures the median time that occurs between two tracking events in our product.
    Based on your documentation, it looks like we can create a "value" property that tracks the time between these two events (in the second, concluding event.
    My question is: How do we then set up a "Total Value" A/B Test that looks at a metric other than counts or sums? In this case, we want to use a median, but…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. requester ahmet.atasoy01.ext@bbc.co.uk

    Type of issue: Feature Experimentation
    Description: Hi,
    We are using Feature Rollout functionality and having difficulties to enable/disable the feature for QA/Dev users.
    What we would like to have is that certain audience, could disable it completely but "Everyone" could be 100%. Looked at the documentation https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/feature-experimentation/docs/target-audiences#advanced-audience-information here and saw the following statement, which we could confirm that if you have an audience that is 0%, and "Everyone" was 100% - the feature for that audience becomes 100%.
    "For example, you cannot exclude all Brazilian users by simply dialing back to 0% traffic for that audience. That is…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. requester chris.thompson@vividseats.com

    Type of issue: Product feedback
    Christopher Thompson sent a feedback.
    Description: When I am updating feature flags in app.optimizely.com, the cancel button is obstructed by the notification/feedback icon, and there's no way to ignore/clear the notifications.
    Can this be moved to another part of the screen so that I can clearly see which save/cancel/revert buttons are available? I would add a screenshot, but it doesn't look like this form will allow it.
    Thanks
    User email: chris.thompson@vividseats.com
    User id: vxrBU3yORCaFdlyq9VMemg
    Account: Vivid Seats
    Account id: d431d760-1424-9252-92b1-c84e8e5af9e8
    http://notify.aptrinsic.com/wf/open?upn=u001.UBmjMNjeoRXVAL5fZIj9r2FPj0g8IcH4DdrYL4fPfah4D3R0lViKImdF1fmAOOcaRyeBR6LSEO6zS6tfDSs06T0yQM35Eu1Jr879enrHEBNAHXCJKhTFnHNzUMsAFjD7gjT-2FT1kxN2GFM7nY2pW9Y87cdmadC7TDD6jFhFrzWp0VZN79SYBLgv2WzFJbvLXJhffi5iZ3LOGl1veJsJZl0VDQPDYKmVRTjee3IohbFMkW7Ku-2BBur8zt9szUI73Nyi

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. requester chase@weedmaps.com

    Type of issue: Product feedback
    Chase Dutton sent a feedback.
    Description: When you guys launched the new UI, it confused the heck outta every developer at Weedmaps and we had many product incidents where a flag was misidentified as being off when it should have been on, or vice versa.
    This confusion wasn't due to any bugs in Optimizely or Weedmaps, just the new UI was visually confusing all who encountered it.
    Anyways we're doing much better now, but yea just wanted to share that feedback. If it confused 100% of our 60+ devs I'm sure it confused…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. requester rineshgopal@gmail.com

    Type of issue: Feature Experimentation
    Description: Can you help to understand about the availability of features below
    1. Tracebility -
    a. Who created, updated, deleted?
    2. Scheduling
    3. RBAC
    a. Fine grained feature flag level access control
    b. Azure AD / Entra ID
    c. Domain specific segragation
    4. Export and import of feature flags
    5. Support for CI/CD ( Blue green / Canary 6. Beta Test ( User specific feature flags.
    a. Enable/Disable flags for testing in all environments, so that testers or developers can choose feature flags in both anonymous and authenticated flows
    7. Input validation on…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. requester ivan.njunjic@aura.com

    Type of issue: Feature Experimentation
    Ivan Njunjic sent a feedback.
    Description: I'd like to measure the effectiveness of our experimentation program through a quarter-long holdout experiment. Is there an easy, self-serve method to set up holdout groups (say, 5% of traffic that would not receive any experiment treatments during the quarter, or do we need to manage this in code via a separate flag? Thanks!
    User email: ivan.njunjic@aura.com
    User id: 3y-jacmkR2mDxmoPks63Vg
    Account id: 7e76915c-e202-a8ec-da88-eda5848b9576
    http://notify.aptrinsic.com/wf/open?upn=Q6elNXBfOd1okuIEgGFEjVYK-2FQeJKmhJxBg4Gdoz-2BpoHYFLIZK2l4Z3cLM28FjN48rQtYKJlQIVk6MrNwrilTz3oceTf5cdas3ShflIPI1NBLe8f3Ld5DuAwwhKHl3EazDUY6TP0JiEFq9GTDqeeJAT26dbbGSrZnzvQKBlYSviT35S8fQKPcHicRTQoGa4PU2MCDHNoxB-2BDxYsgBTJVnmqJ0NUeW43gFOgy0-2FNwQpr6bu1L3nCReD03QxBYZGIP

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. requester ivan.kucheriavenko@printify.com

    Type of issue: Feature Experimentation
    Ivan Kucheriavenko sent a feedback.
    Description: Hello!
    We use in Full Stack project API to update a whitelist - https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/full-stack-experimentation/reference/update_experiment
    This API is not available in Feature Experiment - https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/feature-experimentation/reference/experiments
    Could you please advise if there is a possibility to manage allowlist in Feature Experiment via API?
    Thank you!
    User email: ivan.kucheriavenko@printify.com
    User id: ZwTZutqQSxS-pFtGogihmA
    Account: Printify, Inc.
    Account id: cb9a320a-43ad-02f0-0cf2-6b972153b9ad
    http://notify.aptrinsic.com/wf/open?upn=Q6elNXBfOd1okuIEgGFEjVYK-2FQeJKmhJxBg4Gdoz-2BpoHYFLIZK2l4Z3cLM28FjN4gMdnLml0HMdUs1OuWnMIriGQp81KpODHwPTjdlqY9yxnE5px8uoxtnut6NM2wrj6w-2BKpHaYI9bY3GQXGwciIXD1BMoYxyBN1oKEP9O0k-2BA-2FyyJmSdyG0YnSb2UKZYzqBMpg9-2FIzj-2BCBFZlx-2F1fh16CqJVbK8o132ovJFgYjapSvUnypIQCBip3kAcUmJsvYU

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. In Flags, it is not possible to change the order of variants and have a different "Baseline" variation by default in the Results Page.
    Regardless the possible workaround (change the baseline variation from the results page, the proper behaviour would be to being able to switch the order of the variants (and so decide what the default "Baseline" variant is directly in the Flags Page.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3
  • Don't see your idea?