Skip to content

Feature Experimentation

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

18 results found

  1. role: COE lead for experimentation
    problem: lack of exposure to internal processes and standards and changes to them
    outcome: i would like to be able to insert custom text into the UI at various points, including but not limited to:
    * flag list
    * create flag overlay
    * flag page - ruleset list
    * rule definition page
    * audience list
    * audience creation screen
    * attribute list
    * attribute creation screen
    * event list
    * event creation screen
    * etc.

    basically anywhere you create, define, update and/or name things.

    the intent is to provide content that descibes the current standards…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Research & Design  ·  1 comment  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Depending on the number of teams operating in FX, tech debt accumulates quickly if not managed. Help customers determine how and when to consider tech debt in their FX endeavors.

    Some customers struggle with outdated flags that have not been used in a while, but it is hard for them to determine which ones are outdated.

    Help customers understand how their users are reacting to a new feature rollout.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. When the platform says another 50k users to reach significance, could a date be added? E.g. it has taken 3 weeks to get to 25k so give the date in 3 weeks as the date when the 50k will be reached

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Research & Design  ·  0 comments  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. As a member of a center of excellence,

    I would like to see a prominent link to the rule configuration in the results page

    So I don't have to explain to users all the time the most efficient manner to get back to the rule. This will decrease user frustration when trying to understand what metrics definitions are.

    Most users have not figured out that the environment link takes you back to the rule itself.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Research & Design  ·  0 comments  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. A customer has requested the ability to change the primary environment in Feature Experimentation after the initial project setup. Currently, the primary environment is automatically assigned and cannot be modified, which has led to ongoing frustration for their team.
    They would like the ability to:
    * Reassign the primary environment to another existing environment within the project.
    * Make this change via the UI or API with appropriate safeguards (e.g., confirmation prompts, permissions.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. As a web developer I need to ensure that every point in a request lifecycle uses the same version of an Optimizely datafile to ensure a page is rendered correctly. This includes:
    * edge function logic
    * serverside render
    * clientside hydration
    If there is a mismatch in Optimizely datafile versions between edge function logic and serverside render, then the incorrect decision could be used to generate a page that is saved into the CDN cache. If there is a mismatch in Optimizely datafile versions between the serverside render and the clientside hydration, then hydration mismatch bugs will occur.
    Optimizely's…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Summary:
    This feature request proposes the ability to create flag templates that can be used as a foundation for generating custom flags. Templates would streamline the flag creation process, ensuring consistency and saving time when generating multiple similar flags.
    Use Case:
    Currently, creating flags often requires starting from scratch . This is both time-consuming and prone to errors. By introducing customizable templates, users could:
    * Define reusable structures for flags, including predefined attributes and settings.
    * Quickly apply these templates to generate custom flags with minimal effort.
    * Maintain consistency in flag configuration across projects or teams.
    Benefits:
    * Efficiency:…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. I would like to ask if it's possible to add a "name" field to the FeatureFlag object in in datafiles/xxxxx.json which is having all the configured feature flags there.
    To give some more context on the structure I'm talking about:
    {
    ...
    "featureFlags": [
    {
    "id": "123456",
    "key": "experiment_key",
    -> "name": "Experiment name", <- NEW FIELD HERE
    "rolloutId": "rollout-1233456",
    "experimentIds": [],
    "variables": []
    }
    ...
    ],
    ...
    }
    New "name" field would be having a value of the name of the related flag.
    I'm guessing it could be not available there by default because of privacy/security reasons, but if that's…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Currently, the decision object returned by an SDK's decide method includes the flag, rule, and variation keys that a user was bucketed into but does not return the (experiment rule and variation key that the user was bucketed into.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. The Optimizely for Jira Integration (https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1219783/optimizely-for-jira?tab=overview&hosting=cloud currently appears in all Jira projects when enabled for a Jira instance without the ability to turn off the integration for projects that don't involve/use Optimizely.
    The Jira Integration should be able to be enabled/disabled for each Jira Project so it only shows up for projects where Optimizely is relevant.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. This is a request to create a REST API endpoint that satisfies the following requirements.
    A List Flags endpoint (to return all flags that returns both flags with rules (including variation names, and those with targeted delivery specifying which variation is enabled in the delivery.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. When calling decideAll( with a User Profile Service (UPS, the method looks up the UPS for each flag.
    The request is that the SDKs be updated to default to just one lookup for all flags.
    This will prevent unnecessary resource consumption for customers who utilize decideAll( method and also implement/rely upon a USP.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Description: Good afternoon,
    My team and I would like to run an A/B test that measures the median time that occurs between two tracking events in our product.
    Based on your documentation, it looks like we can create a "value" property that tracks the time between these two events (in the second, concluding event.
    My question is: How do we then set up a "Total Value" A/B Test that looks at a metric other than counts or sums? In this case, we want to use a median, but could use average if median is not possible.
    While your "Total Value"…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. As an experimenter I would like to be able to have an audience auto populate for an entire project. The bot filtering provided within Optimizely does not exclude additional bots that we need to remove from testing as an organization, and therefore we need to apply an additional audience to our tests to remove these bots from all test. Currently we have to do this manually for every test which allows for human error. But we would like to be able to auto populate this for all feature experiments within a project to avoid this step being forgotten.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Description: When I am updating feature flags in app.optimizely.com, the cancel button is obstructed by the notification/feedback icon, and there's no way to ignore/clear the notifications.
    Can this be moved to another part of the screen so that I can clearly see which save/cancel/revert buttons are available? I would add a screenshot, but it doesn't look like this form will allow it.
    Thanks

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. When a task is archived, a notification is sent to all watchers assigned to the task.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Description: Hi,
    We are using Feature Rollout functionality and having difficulties to enable/disable the feature for QA/Dev users.
    What we would like to have is that certain audience, could disable it completely but "Everyone" could be 100%. Looked at the documentation https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/feature-experimentation/docs/target-audiences#advanced-audience-information here and saw the following statement, which we could confirm that if you have an audience that is 0%, and "Everyone" was 100% - the feature for that audience becomes 100%.
    "For example, you cannot exclude all Brazilian users by simply dialing back to 0% traffic for that audience. That is because if you turn off audience evaluation…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. We use in Full Stack project API to update a whitelist - https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/full-stack-experimentation/reference/update_experiment
    This API is not available in Feature Experiment - https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/feature-experimentation/reference/experiments
    Could you please advise if there is a possibility to manage allowlist in Feature Experiment via API?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?