Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1615 of 1615

As a developer I would like to be able to save Application Insights log queries

No description provided
over 2 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Telemetry 0 Future consideration

Better proofing interface

Need distinct buttons that allow actions to be taken on a proof, beyond markup (e.g., approved, approved with changes, share, etc.)
10 months ago in Content Marketing / Miscellaneous 0 Future consideration

Request submission automation

Allow requests to be submitted and advanced without mutliple "acceptance" actions, i.e., automate this part of the submission while retaining the form details, and assign a workflow to the intake directly.
10 months ago in Content Marketing / Tasks, Campaigns, and Events 0 Future consideration

CyberSource-Payeezy replacement Payment gateway Full Authorization Reversal

Payment gateway Payeezy will sunset. A solution is required. We have orders that are submitted and not yet shipped so there is no settlement that has occurred. In Cybersource payment gateway a cancellation of the credit card authorization (Note ye...
10 months ago in Integrations 0

Mobile Responsive Results

No description provided
over 1 year ago in Experimentation Analytics / Results Page 2 Future consideration

Ability to hide edit option for Library role users

Please provide Admins with the ability to hide the EDIT request option for users in the Library role (e.g., "Hide edit request"). Our Library role users (over 1,000) will never be given the ability to EDIT an image. The appearance of the Edit opti...
10 months ago in Content Marketing / DAM/Library 0 Future consideration

Ability to restore websites

When a website is inadvertantly deleted we'd like the ability to be able to restore it
over 1 year ago in Configured Commerce / Technical 1 Will not consider

UI improvements for inline blocks

Here are some suggestions for UI improvement for inline blocks. Allow resizing of overlay. This will help content editors who have larger screens to more easily work - especially with properties like TinyMCE/XhtmlString that require more space Mis...
11 months ago in Content Management 0

Allow changing inline block name

By default the block type name is displayed in the content area when creating inline blocks. This can be confusing when you have multiple blocks of the same type. Ideally editors would be able to rename/provide a name for inline blocks (this can b...
11 months ago in Content Management 1

Set Step Duration to Hours (in addition to days)

Suggestion for step duration option in the Workflow template: Update to allow for smaller time increments than 1 full day/in business days. We can't use this function because many of our steps are assigned the same day as other steps. It would sav...
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing / Tasks, Campaigns, and Events 0 Future consideration