Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1681 of 1681

webhook for automated opens

As a marketeer I want to receive a webhok for automated opens, because I want to analyse the follwoing: Why don't I receive any opens from this recipients? Is it realy an inactive reader? How is the share of users having some sort of privacy prote...
over 1 year ago in Campaign 0 Future consideration

DAM + CMS

We need a better integration between CMS and DAM.
10 months ago in Content Marketing / DAM/Library 0 Investigating

CMS + FX

We need an integration between FX and CMS similar to the one Contentful has but better.
10 months ago in Feature Experimentation / Experiment Authoring 0 Investigating

Bitly support

When creating a landing page through CMP, we would like to bring common actions into the platform which currently involve a lot of copy-paste work. We often have to create shortlinks for campaigns/pages we attach to tasks in CMP. Would be great if...

Logger having error categorised into types

The Optimizely logger indicates different types of errors. Our client suggests to divide the different types of errors by type. Example use case: our client is currently using a Regex to identify the error messages received for the error "not in d...
over 1 year ago in Feature Experimentation / SDKs & Agent 1 Future consideration

Customizable idea scoring

Score ideas and experiments using a customizable scoring rubric. Support group voting.

Use the color-coding for labels throughout the Plan views

No description provided

On the Experiment tab, add links to the variation preview url for easy reference

No description provided

Make workflows rigid (can't rearrange steps or complete out-of-order)

As a experimentation owner, I do not want users completing steps out of sequence or bypassing important steps

Amplitude >< ODP

I see Amplitude as a hopeful integration often with prospects usually around Web Experimentation. Lately this came up when discussing ODP and bringing in Amplitude data/personas for future segmentation.
over 1 year ago in Integrations 0 Investigating