183 results found

1. Allow ancestor/children links in Content Areas in Content Graph

   I am looking to get the parent/children of a content item that is used within a Content Area to support a hierarchical relationship. Currently, it is not possible to use the _link property on Content Areas within Content Graph.

   In this query:

   query MyQuery {
     MyPage(where:{ContentLink:{Id:{eq: 1119}}}) {
       item {
         ContentLink {
           Id
         }
         _link(type: ANCESTORS) {
           MyParentPage {
             items {
               Url
             }
           }
         }
       }
     }
     MyBlock(where:{ContentLink:{Id: {eq:1127}}}) {
       items {
         Cards {
           ContentLink {
             Id
             Expanded {
               _link(type: ANCESTORS) {
                 MyParentPage {
                   items {
                     Url
                   }
                 }
               }
             }
           }
         }
       }
     }
   }
   

   In the first query, we get back the parent items as expected, but in the second query we do not get any data for the _link. We should get back the same data in both.

   I am looking to get the parent/children of a content item that is used within a Content Area to support a hierarchical relationship. Currently, it is not possible to use the _link property on Content Areas within Content Graph.

   In this query:

   query MyQuery {
     MyPage(where:{ContentLink:{Id:{eq: 1119}}}) {
       item {
         ContentLink {
           Id
         }
         _link(type: ANCESTORS) {
           MyParentPage {
             items {
               Url
             }
           }
         }
       }
     }
     MyBlock(where:{ContentLink:{Id: {eq:1127}}}) {
       items {
         Cards {
           ContentLink {
             Id
             Expanded {
               _link(type: ANCESTORS) {
                 MyParentPage {
                   items {
                     Url
                   }
                 }
               }
             }
           }
         }
       }
     }
   }
   

   In the first query,… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Graph  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   Research & Design  ·  AdminCiara Bergin (Principal Product Manager, Optimizely) responded

   Thanks for sharing this idea. Our product and design teams are looking into it now. We’re exploring possible solutions and figuring out what implementation could involve. We’ll keep you posted here as things progress.

2. Move ADE envs during migrations to CMS 12

   Customers who upgrade CMS versions using Self service (11->12) tooling lose access to ADEs unless they specifically request them to be re-provisioned. They should be moved over as part of the migration process. As a standard all provisioned environments including ADE's should be spun up when a migration is completed.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Gathering Feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  Migration / Upgrades  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. Redirect page after expiration

   It would be great if it is possible te set a redirection (just like in the no-found handler) when a page is expired and is replaced by another page in the website. This would make the process much more user-friendly.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Security & Compliance  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   Future Consideration  ·  AdminMatthew Slim (Product Manager, Optimizely) responded

   Thanks for raising this - just to let you know this is now in our backlog. While we can’t share an exact release date yet, this means it’s planned for consideration in the future. Thanks for helping us prioritize this work.

4. Ability to rename PaaS Instances to align with customer use cases

   Currently when Applications are provisioned, the application name is auto generated and not changeable. This makes it hard in the long term to align support tickets which align to a specific customer site/application, which delays support and contributes to errors. Creating the ability for these names to be changed will improve support and reduce confusion.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Gathering Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Need to get pinned regularly used pages in cms

   There is lot of sites and pages in Optimizely CMS and content editors feel that it would be easier if they could get pinned pages they are frequently editing. Now it requires to open levels and scroll before getting the correct page if search finds many pages.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Future Consideration  ·  1 comment  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Ability to add custom CAA records in a managed clients zone in Optimizely Cloudflare account
   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Future Consideration  ·  0 comments  ·  DXP, Hosting & Infrastructure  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Option to exclude properties from translation in Language Manager

   As an editor using the Language Manager add-on to translate from one master language to another, I'd like to select individual properties to EXCLUDE from translation. Certain properties (e.g. URL, title etc) may contain key terms, names etc that should not be translated.

   Note: This is slightly different from another feedback idea;
   https://feedback.optimizely.com/forums/966081-cms-paas-content-management-system/suggestions/49891608-language-manager-won-t-let-you-exclude-terms-tran

   though both these ideas would solve the same core problem.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Translations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating
   Gathering Feedback  ·  AdminMaheen Neha (Senior Product Manager, Optimizely) responded

   We’re currently gathering additional feedback on this idea. If you have any more context, examples, or specific use cases, please share them - it really helps us understand how this would best support your workflow. Thanks for contributing to the conversation!

8. Database timeout during site starting up after removing properties of block type

   I am a senior developer. We have been facing this issue where when we remove properties of block type the site fails to start and throws database timeout during ModelSyncInitialization. This happens even when a single property of block type is removed.
   We have an open ticket with support and have tried a few solutions but the only option that works is to increase the DatabaseQueryTimeout to an hour or so.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Gathering Feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  DXP, Hosting & Infrastructure  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Language Manager Role wise access

   In the Languages gadget (Language Manager add-on), users have the option to duplicate content when creating a new language branch. During this process, the “Duplicate content” dialog presents checkboxes for:

   Add all children

   Add related content(s)

   These options are useful for administrators but pose a risk when used by editors who may not fully understand the implications. For example, an editor in our organization mistakenly duplicated a section with over 800 nodes, resulting in around 500 duplicated blocks. This caused significant manual cleanup and unnecessary content clutter.

   Feature Request:

   We would like the ability to restrict visibility or access to these options based on user roles, ideally allowing only administrators or users with a specific permission set to see or use these checkboxes.

   Benefits:

   Prevents accidental large-scale content duplication by non-admin users.

   Reduces cleanup effort and risk of content sprawl.

   Adds a layer of governance around language branch creation.

   In the Languages gadget (Language Manager add-on), users have the option to duplicate content when creating a new language branch. During this process, the “Duplicate content” dialog presents checkboxes for:

   Add all children

   Add related content(s)

   These options are useful for administrators but pose a risk when used by editors who may not fully understand the implications. For example, an editor in our organization mistakenly duplicated a section with over 800 nodes, resulting in around 500 duplicated blocks. This caused significant manual cleanup and unnecessary content clutter.

   Feature Request:

   We would like the ability to restrict visibility or access to… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   Gathering Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Translations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Customize the "Workflow status" Section in CMS UI Dashboard (v12.18.0+)

    CMS UI version 12.18.0 introduced a new dashboard with a "Workflow status" section. This section can display thousands of pages in some environments, each with multiple elements. This can result in a bloated and less usable interface, potentially affecting performance and user experience.

    We would like to request the ability to:

    1. Clear or limit the number of items displayed in the "Workflow status" section

    2. Filter the displayed items based on specific criteria (e.g., content type, date, language, or user)

    3. Customize or replace the section with a custom implementation if needed

    Providing more control or configuration options for this section would improve usability and scalability for teams working with large volumes of content.

    Reference: https://world.optimizely.com/blogs/matthew-slim/dates/2023/3/new-dashboard-implemented-in-cms-ui-12-18-0/

    CMS UI version 12.18.0 introduced a new dashboard with a "Workflow status" section. This section can display thousands of pages in some environments, each with multiple elements. This can result in a bloated and less usable interface, potentially affecting performance and user experience.

    We would like to request the ability to:

    1. Clear or limit the number of items displayed in the "Workflow status" section

    2. Filter the displayed items based on specific criteria (e.g., content type, date, language, or user)

    3. Customize or replace the section with a custom implementation if needed

    Providing more control or configuration options for this section would… more

    •  

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. 'Stop words' feature in Optimizely Graph

    We need to stop few words from search or indexing. For example, in case of search term 'having a baby' also brings results with 'a' which does not make sense. We are looking for a similar feature like 'synonyms'. We have been advised in the ticket reference 1748761 (https://support.optimizely.com/hc/en-us/requests/1748761) to raise a feature request to bring this feature back as its currently deprecated. We are from Publicis Sapient and working for St Luke's digital transformation project.

    The below document does not have enough details in the API call with PUT method. Also it says the feature is deprecated.

    https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/platform-optimizely/docs/stopwords#:~:text=Stop%20words%20with%20full%2Dtext%20search&text=a%2C%20an%2C%20and%2C%20are,a%20token%20from%20being%20indexed.

    We need to stop few words from search or indexing. For example, in case of search term 'having a baby' also brings results with 'a' which does not make sense. We are looking for a similar feature like 'synonyms'. We have been advised in the ticket reference 1748761 (https://support.optimizely.com/hc/en-us/requests/1748761) to raise a feature request to bring this feature back as its currently deprecated. We are from Publicis Sapient and working for St Luke's digital transformation project.

    The below document does not have enough details in the API call with PUT method. Also it says the feature is deprecated.

    … more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Graph  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating
    Research & Design  ·  AdminCiara Bergin (Principal Product Manager, Optimizely) responded

    Good news - this idea is now being explored by our product and design teams. We’re researching potential solutions and scoping out what an implementation might look like. We’ll share updates here as our thinking evolves.

12. Is there any way to identify the user who changed the access rights?

    Is there a way to track or identify the user who modified the access rights in Episerver/CMS? It appears that someone has changed the access permissions using the 'Set Access Rights' feature.
    We need to determine who made these changes to ensure proper access control and prevent unauthorized modifications. Is there any audit log, system event tracking, or CMS activity history that can help us trace the user responsible for this action? Any insights or recommendations on how to retrieve this information would be greatly appreciated.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Research & Design  ·  1 comment  ·  Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Retain versions correctly for a content move in CMS tree (to fix invalid editor history

    As a content editor I want to be able to move content (for example a page in the CMS tree. When I do this at present a new version is created but this is merged with the previous update for that content. I want a new version to be created and the old version to be retained in order that the true date/time and editor of any changes is visible from the version history.
    For example:
    * Editor A creates and publishes a page on 1 Sept 2024
    * Editor B updates and publishes the same page on 15 Oct 2024
    * Result (as expected - Version history shows the 2 versions:
    1 Sept 2024 - Previously published by Editor A
    15 Oct 2024 - Published by Editor B
    * Editor C moves the page on 2 Jan 2025 in the content tree (which will update/save the page metadata as the sort ID will change
    * Current result - Version history only shows 2 versions, losing the version from October:
    1 Sept 2024 - Previously published by Editor A
    2 Jan 2025 - Published by Editor C
    Comparing versions it now looks like Editor C has made all the changes on 2 Jan 2025 which were in fact made by Editor B on 15 Oct 2024. The lack of traceability is a significant issue for our customer.
    * Requested result - Version history should show 3 versions
    1 Sept 2024 - Previously published by Editor A
    15 Oct 2024 - Previously published by Editor B
    2 Jan 2025 - Published by Editor C
    Note for Optimizely - We raised this as a bug in ticket 1584615, you have had internal discussions based upon this.

    As a content editor I want to be able to move content (for example a page in the CMS tree. When I do this at present a new version is created but this is merged with the previous update for that content. I want a new version to be created and the old version to be retained in order that the true date/time and editor of any changes is visible from the version history.
    For example:
    * Editor A creates and publishes a page on 1 Sept 2024
    * Editor B updates and publishes the same page on 15 Oct… more

    7 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Research & Design  ·  0 comments  ·  Versions  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Granular Access Rights for CMS Settings Area

    In the Settings area anyone with the "CMSAdmin" or "Content Admins" has access to the full rights to edit anything in here.
    We should be able to set granular rights to these function areas for example if I want a specific user group to be able to make updates to Content Types but not Manage Website and Access Right this should be possible

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Research & Design  ·  1 comment  ·  Login, Roles & Permissions  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Google analytics 4 report

    Google analytics 4 data to be available for language version reports inside CMS.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Enhance the Audience Feature to display the affected number of items

    Audience groups should include the dependent items that use them, similar to blocks, this will give visibility to authors on all the effect areas where that personalization was used when a change is made

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Research & Design  ·  0 comments  ·  Personalization  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Language Manager in combination with the auto translate feature

    Language Manager in combination with the auto translate feature

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  Translations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Auto-translate

    I use Auto-Transalte a lot but I don't want the Name, URL and Reference to be translated automatically.

    When handling multiple language websites it is practical to keep the Name, URL & Reference in English.

    The URL I can change manually if necessary

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Translations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating
    Gathering Feedback  ·  AdminTom Bramley (Senior Product Manager, Optimizely) responded

    Thank you for raising this feedback request. We will continue to gather feedback to assess demand for this functionality.

19. Need better recursive adding of items for Language Manager
    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  Translations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Feedback on UI Layout in Optimizely 12 Edit Mode

    In Optimizely 12 I have noticed a significant change in the Edit Mode UI layout that I would like to share as feedback.
    In Optimizely 11, the Edit Mode UI was more compact, providing editors with a more efficient workspace and minimizing empty space. However, in Optimizely 12, the Edit Mode layout includes a considerable amount of empty space, reducing the effective workspace for editors. This change is affecting the user experience, especially for those who were accustomed to the more compact design in Optimizely 11.This was one of the feedback points we received from our editors.
    I would like to know if this feedback can be taken into consideration for future releases of Optimizely 12. It would be highly beneficial if there were an option to make the Edit Mode UI more compact, similar to the previous version, to improve the overall editing experience.

    In Optimizely 12 I have noticed a significant change in the Edit Mode UI layout that I would like to share as feedback.
    In Optimizely 11, the Edit Mode UI was more compact, providing editors with a more efficient workspace and minimizing empty space. However, in Optimizely 12, the Edit Mode layout includes a considerable amount of empty space, reducing the effective workspace for editors. This change is affecting the user experience, especially for those who were accustomed to the more compact design in Optimizely 11.This was one of the feedback points we received from our editors.
    I would like… more

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Research & Design  ·  0 comments  ·  Editing (Content)  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Nice to have You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating