Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1836 of 1836

UserProfile visitor group criterion should not throw an exception if current user is logged in through external OpenID Connect provider such as AzureAD / Entra ID.

As a site administrator of a site using mixed-mode authentication (both AspNetIdentity for local users and OpenID Connect for AzureAD / Entra ID users), I want to know that my site will not break if I set up a visitor group using the Site Criteria...
4 months ago in Content Management / Personalization 0

Create new user based on other user

As a Customer I want to be able to create new users quickly based on the roles and permissions another user has. Like "create a new user B that has the same roles and permissions as user A".
over 2 years ago in Campaign 0 Future consideration

DirectDeploy For Preproduction And Production

I'd like to request the ability to use DirectDeploy on both preproduction and production as currently the option is only available for integration. I understand that during the DirectDeploy process the site becomes unavailable, which you'd typical...
about 1 year ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Code deployment 1 Future consideration

Creation of Folders in ODP to better categorize reports, segments, filters, behaviors, etc

Creating a structured folder organization in the Optimizely Data Platform for filters, reports, segments, and behaviors enhances usability and efficiency, allowing teams to quickly locate and manage key assets. By grouping related items, such as f...
about 1 month ago in Data Platform App 0

Unable to move multiple pages into hierarchy tree

We found the CMS system doesn't allow you to move multiple pages into the hierarchy tree, the only way is to move them one by one, which is very tedious and time-consuming. The only way is to write a custom class and archive them based on date cre...
over 2 years ago in Content Management / Editing 2 Investigating

Show/Hide logic for Work Request forms

We would like the ability to show or hide different fields in a Work Request form based on a user selected drop down. For example, if a user selects Website Update from the Request Type dropdown, only fields in section Website Update would display...
5 months ago in Content Marketing / Requests 3

Enable drag and drop for PropertyList<T> in the editing experience

Would it be possible to enable drag & drop in the editing experience of property list similar to content areas. PropertyList are sometime favored in content type architecture as they take less editorial time to setup then blocks.
over 2 years ago in Content Management / Editing 2 Future consideration

Implement list properties same way as in CMS

Hello, on CMS there is a feature called "List Properties", explained in the docs here. It would be useful if the same mechanism was available for products/variants/bundles in Commerce as well. Currently it is quite confusing that a certain type of...
7 months ago in Customized Commerce / Catalogs 0 Gathering interest

Please whitelist .NET native library Azure.Storage.Common

You have whitelisted the following Azure libraries but not Azure.Storage.Common: Azure.Core Azure.Identity Azure.Storage.Blobs Could you please whitelist Azure.Storage.Common as this is a Microsoft .NET native library and we need it to upload file...
5 months ago in Configured Commerce / 3rd Party Library Allow Listing 0

Allow for Feature Branches instead of Single Branches to allow for easier code management.

To improve our velocity and quality of deployments we would prefer Optimizely allow us to implement changes using feature branches instead of requiring us to either bundle all changes into a single branch or work them one at a time in series. This...
15 days ago in Product Recommendations / Technical 0