Skip to content

Feature Experimentation

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

56 results found

  1. Hello!

    We very much appreciate the arrival of ratio metrics. However, they do provide limited value to us as long as Custom Event properties are not usable for either numerator or denominator.

    It would be awesome to see that added.

    Role: I am the Team Lead for our experimentation center-of-excellence and infra team.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Add a "status changed" date to the FX Flags overview page. Because currently, there is a "created" and "modified" column. However, "Modified" refers to any changes, and there is no easy way to see when a status was changed, so when a rule was changed to its current state (started/paused/concluded)... it would be valuable information for the customer just within the FX UI.

    Additional context: https://jira.sso.episerver.net/browse/DHK-2914?focusedId=2087943&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-2087943

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. To enable FX personalization, be able to pull audiences from other tools.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Customers want to have metrics they track in their analytics in Optimizely. Today they have to manually add new event instrumentation. Would be great to integrate with other analytics and import their event tracking in Optimizely (ie. similar to Segment integration)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Similar to Optimizely Web, capture basic segmentation (browser, device, ...) out of the box.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  SDKs  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Filter activity notifications via webhook to only production environment.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Make SDKs compatible with OpenFeature standard.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  SDKs  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Ability for developers to enable an event inspector to ensure instrumentation is working correctly

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Make change to flag (e.g., toggle on/off) based on event from external system (e.g., APM alert).

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Be able to trigger flags if certain actions happen, or make flags dependent on other flags. Both stateless and stateful approaches.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Almost none of my customers implement long-term flags. Every time they run a new experiment, they create a new flag, and remove it after. Even if they could have reused the flag for a new experiment a month later. This creates a lot of additional work.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. It's hard to manage flags/tests at scale without being able to group them and capture more metadata on them.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Help customers understand how flags/experiments are affecting site performance.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Depending on the number of teams operating in FX, tech debt accumulates quickly if not managed. Help customers determine how and when to consider tech debt in their FX endeavors.

    Some customers struggle with outdated flags that have not been used in a while, but it is hard for them to determine which ones are outdated.

    Help customers understand how their users are reacting to a new feature rollout.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  3 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. A customer has requested the ability to change the primary environment in Feature Experimentation after the initial project setup. Currently, the primary environment is automatically assigned and cannot be modified, which has led to ongoing frustration for their team.
    They would like the ability to:
    * Reassign the primary environment to another existing environment within the project.
    * Make this change via the UI or API with appropriate safeguards (e.g., confirmation prompts, permissions.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Summary:
    This feature request proposes the ability to create flag templates that can be used as a foundation for generating custom flags. Templates would streamline the flag creation process, ensuring consistency and saving time when generating multiple similar flags.
    Use Case:
    Currently, creating flags often requires starting from scratch . This is both time-consuming and prone to errors. By introducing customizable templates, users could:
    * Define reusable structures for flags, including predefined attributes and settings.
    * Quickly apply these templates to generate custom flags with minimal effort.
    * Maintain consistency in flag configuration across projects or teams.
    Benefits:
    * Efficiency:…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. I would like to ask if it's possible to add a "name" field to the FeatureFlag object in in datafiles/xxxxx.json which is having all the configured feature flags there.
    To give some more context on the structure I'm talking about:
    {
    ...
    "featureFlags": [
    {
    "id": "123456",
    "key": "experiment_key",
    -> "name": "Experiment name", <- NEW FIELD HERE
    "rolloutId": "rollout-1233456",
    "experimentIds": [],
    "variables": []
    }
    ...
    ],
    ...
    }
    New "name" field would be having a value of the name of the related flag.
    I'm guessing it could be not available there by default because of privacy/security reasons, but if that's…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. While the decision object returned from the SDK currently provides the flag status, variation key, and rule key, there is currently no built-in way to determine whether the rule that returned the decision was an A/B test or targeted delivery. A workaround would be to use specific naming conventions for different rule types, but it would be useful to have this information baked into the decision object by default.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. While the decision object allows you to see which rule delivered a feature, it does not specify whether this rule is an A/B Test, Targeted Delivery, etc.
    Customer naming conventions could theoretically provide this kind of context, but we've received a request from Nike to make this available in the SDK itself.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Currently, the decision object returned by an SDK's decide method includes the flag, rule, and variation keys that a user was bucketed into but does not return the (experiment rule and variation key that the user was bucketed into.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?