575 results found
-
backdate
Should be able to backdate start/end dates in requests.
3 votes -
Users with view only should not be able to download assets on a CMP Task
Users with view access can still download assets in task!
Why can a user with view-only access be able to download an asset inside the task. I thought the expected behavior was that you could not download it.4 votes -
Ability to annotate a PDF without a comment being attached
Our team regularly proofed large (think 200 page) PDFs. We often use annotation features like the strikeout for other team members to make changes, but currently every single strikeout requires an associated comment. I understand the need to have comments with other types of annotations for guidance, but given the intent of a strikeout is pretty clear, could there be a setting to make comments not mandatory for a strikeout?
5 votes -
After a WRQ is accepted and converted into a task, requester is not automatically assigned to task
Describe the challenge:
After a WRQ is accepted and converted into a task, seemingly the requester is not automatically assigned to task. They continue to reference and even add more comments into the WRQ form, instead of in the active task.What impact is this challenge having?:
By referencing and adding more comments into the WRQ form that has already been converted active task is confusing and time consuming. We have to use the job title to cross reference the TSK w/ the WRQ request. Then add and instruct them to the active task, along with the inforamtion their where…3 votes -
Request to Disable Report Notification Emails
It would be helpful to provide an option for users or customer organizations to choose whether they want to receive generated reports via email.
4 votes -
Use the holiday list for commercial purposes (not OOO)
I perceive the CMP organization calendar as an "external helper", and not a way to keep track on who is OOO - as other tools do that already.
Any way to add holidays without them impacting inviduals OOO settings?
1 vote -
Enhanced Task Permissions: contribute once assets or steps are approved but not edit
We need to limit some users in what they can do in a task, like they can add content or complete their steps, but they can't change fields or asset expiry date once the asset has been approved in the task
2 votes -
Limit workflow options based on brief type
Based on a brief type I would like users to have limited options about the available workflows they can select. For example, for a social brief, only a select range of workflows which are relevant to social briefs should appear as options.
2 votes -
Approval should clear when a new version of an asset is uploaded.
When a new version of an asset is uploaded we feel the previous approvals should be invalidated? It would also be really helpful to link the comments and resolutions to a version of an asset for accuracy of the audit trail.
3 votes -
Would like to change the owner of a milestone
I work in Marketing Operations and am a CMP admin. It would be very helpful to be able to change the owner on milestones in the CMP.
3 votes -
1 vote
-
Team Visibility
Would it be possible, when adding a team to a workflow, to be able to see who is in the team?
1 vote -
Be able to set up reoccuring tasks under campaigns
We have a task that we need to copy/paste with new dates very easily. It would be create to be able to set up reoccuring tasks (weekly basis) to be able to set up. This way we can have the right calendar view for each of the individual tasks but remove some of the manual work of copying/pasting tasks and then updating dates.
1 vote -
UI Feature - Add New Version button
End-users are often confused and "Add Content" instead of adding a new Version under the Content tab, leading to confusion despite having been trained. One way to make this easier would be to have a "Upload new version" button that is as prominent as "Add Content" under the content tab to help prevent user error.
3 votes -
Allow Boolean Search in General Search Bar
Allow Boolean search in general search bar. For example, searching only the title (title:"XYZ"), etc.
2 votes -
Product Feedback: Admin Functionality
Description: Hi, I am a admin user but still not able to enable any user or resend the notification to anyone.. as not getting that option only.
5 votes -
Wiki functionality
For internal marketing teams, it would be really powerful if we could add internal team documentation, brand portal, and other files to a wiki-like portal.
Ideally this sits within the Optimizely ecosystem. CMP already has 'collections' and this would just add the option to add rich-text style pages, extending that existing functionality.
2 votes -
Allow for requestor to submit multiple request items
I'm a CMP admin and would like for request forms to have functionality added so that our stakeholders/requestors are able to request multiple items across 1 request form submission. I've already discussed this with Natalia and Shadab however am adding this for others to provide additional thoughts or upvotes so we're able to prioritize as soon as possible.
Currently when submitting a Creative request, our stakeholders are able to request multiple items as long as it falls under the same multi-select field option - so for example if they're requesting multiple digital asset items. However, if they would like to…
2 votes -
Hyperlink name of collection when adding asset to collection
When adding an asset to a collection please could we make it so that the collection name is hyperlinked (not just the selection box). It's very unintuitive that you select the name of the collection and it links you to 'home' instead of the collection
1 vote -
Show/Hide logic for Work Request forms
We would like the ability to show or hide different fields in a Work Request form based on a user selected drop down.
For example, if a user selects Website Update from the Request Type dropdown, only fields in section Website Update would display and all others would be hidden.
In current state, you can choose to jump to a certain section, but other sections remain visible so the jump logic doesn't provide much value as users still have to scroll past irrelevant sections of the form to submit it. I did confirm with one of the IT engineers there…23 votes
- Don't see your idea?