Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1837 of 1837

Unable to move multiple pages into hierarchy tree

We found the CMS system doesn't allow you to move multiple pages into the hierarchy tree, the only way is to move them one by one, which is very tedious and time-consuming. The only way is to write a custom class and archive them based on date cre...
over 2 years ago in Content Management / Editing 2 Investigating

Enable drag and drop for PropertyList<T> in the editing experience

Would it be possible to enable drag & drop in the editing experience of property list similar to content areas. PropertyList are sometime favored in content type architecture as they take less editorial time to setup then blocks.
over 2 years ago in Content Management / Editing 2 Future consideration

Enable "Session Count" feature in ODP

The session count feature was removed from ODP due to data issues. This request is to re-enable it.
13 days ago in Data Platform App 0 Future consideration

Show/Hide logic for Work Request forms

We would like the ability to show or hide different fields in a Work Request form based on a user selected drop down. For example, if a user selects Website Update from the Request Type dropdown, only fields in section Website Update would display...
5 months ago in Content Marketing / Requests 3

Implement list properties same way as in CMS

Hello, on CMS there is a feature called "List Properties", explained in the docs here. It would be useful if the same mechanism was available for products/variants/bundles in Commerce as well. Currently it is quite confusing that a certain type of...
7 months ago in Customized Commerce / Catalogs 0 Gathering interest

Track IList<ContentReference> in Commerce - warning before deleting content

While being within Commerce and trying to remove a block that is used you don't get a proper warning. One can use flag EnableFeatureGetReferencesInCatalog which replaces ReferencedContentResolver with CommerceReferencedContentResolver. It looks li...
14 days ago in Customized Commerce / Technical 0

Add "name" field to FeatureFlag object in datafile

I would like to ask if it’s possible to add a "name" field to the FeatureFlag object in in datafiles/xxxxx.json which is having all the configured feature flags there. To give some more context on the structure I’m talking about: { ... "featureFla...
15 days ago in Feature Experimentation / Other 0

Creation of Folders in ODP to better categorize reports, segments, filters, behaviors, etc

Creating a structured folder organization in the Optimizely Data Platform for filters, reports, segments, and behaviors enhances usability and efficiency, allowing teams to quickly locate and manage key assets. By grouping related items, such as f...
about 1 month ago in Data Platform App 0

Delete Custom created Objects

We would like the ability to delete or hide custom created Objects. Currently these tasks must be handled by Support/Engineering and it can take a long time for these requests to be processed.
8 months ago in Data Platform App 0 Future consideration

Please whitelist .NET native library Azure.Storage.Common

You have whitelisted the following Azure libraries but not Azure.Storage.Common: Azure.Core Azure.Identity Azure.Storage.Blobs Could you please whitelist Azure.Storage.Common as this is a Microsoft .NET native library and we need it to upload file...
5 months ago in Configured Commerce / 3rd Party Library Allow Listing 0