Skip to content

Feature Experimentation

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

19 results found

  1. I manage platform use.
    I am trying to make it easier for users to see all related flags that might be used for a single delivery.
    I would like a way to list 'related flags' somewhere in the flag definition. there can be multiple flags related to multiple flags. one flag might have a few different relations. the relation list should be links to prod environment page for the defined related flag.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. The list events endpoint currently returns all events, including those from archived projects. This becomes problematic when there are a large number of such events. Could you enhance the archive project functionality so that it also archives the events within the project?

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Problem:
    Currently, the search function in Optimizely Experimentation only filters by a single word, even if multiple words are entered. For example, if a user searches for “Headers for PDP”, the results only return matches for “Headers”. This limits discoverability and forces users to rely on entering very specific single keywords.

    Proposed Solution:
    Update the search functionality to apply all words entered in the query, rather than restricting results to the first word only. This way, users can perform both broad and specific searches as needed.

    Reasoning / Business Impact:
    For customers running numerous tests, Efficiently searching and reviewing experiments…

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. If a flag status is Draft and a user attempts to change the value of that flag, the UI should notify the user that they are changing a flag that is not yet in Running state.

    This will prevent cases where someone thinks they have changed a flag state, but as far as the system is concerned, they have not.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. I would like the ability to create folders within projects to organize our work. This would allow users to organize work by developer or by area of the site.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  2 comments  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Unfortunately, in the new Flags UI the JIRA Integration is no longer available (as it is not yet migrated). My Idea Post is about requesting its availability.

    In our Company we have a very close relationship between JIRA Tickets + Experiment Rules (1:1). That's why, this integration is/was helpful to relate Code/Work accordingly.

    Many thanks in advance
    Michael

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  SDKs  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. It would be great to have some kind of filters that allow a deeper dive into data. So if we wanted to see how many people bought a licence AFTER triggering a specified conversion

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Hello!

    We very much appreciate the arrival of ratio metrics. However, they do provide limited value to us as long as Custom Event properties are not usable for either numerator or denominator.

    It would be awesome to see that added.

    Role: I am the Team Lead for our experimentation center-of-excellence and infra team.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  UX  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Customers want to have metrics they track in their analytics in Optimizely. Today they have to manually add new event instrumentation. Would be great to integrate with other analytics and import their event tracking in Optimizely (ie. similar to Segment integration)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Similar to Optimizely Web, capture basic segmentation (browser, device, ...) out of the box.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Gathering Feedback  ·  0 comments  ·  SDKs  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Ability for developers to enable an event inspector to ensure instrumentation is working correctly

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Help customers understand how flags/experiments are affecting site performance.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. While the decision object returned from the SDK currently provides the flag status, variation key, and rule key, there is currently no built-in way to determine whether the rule that returned the decision was an A/B test or targeted delivery. A workaround would be to use specific naming conventions for different rule types, but it would be useful to have this information baked into the decision object by default.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. While the decision object allows you to see which rule delivered a feature, it does not specify whether this rule is an A/B Test, Targeted Delivery, etc.
    Customer naming conventions could theoretically provide this kind of context, but we've received a request from Nike to make this available in the SDK itself.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. When you guys launched the new UI, it confused the heck outta every developer at COMPANY and we had many product incidents where a flag was misidentified as being off when it should have been on, or vice versa.
    This confusion wasn't due to any bugs in Optimizely or COMPANY, just the new UI was visually confusing all who encountered it.
    Anyways we're doing much better now, but yea just wanted to share that feedback. If it confused 100% of our 60+ devs I'm sure it confused everyone that uses Optimizely haha. I wonder if crowdstrike uses Optimizely. LOL.
    Godspeed!

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. I'd like to measure the effectiveness of our experimentation program through a quarter-long holdout experiment. Is there an easy, self-serve method to set up holdout groups (say, 5% of traffic that would not receive any experiment treatments during the quarter, or do we need to manage this in code via a separate flag? Thanks!

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. As a developer I want to be able to use an Optimizely provider for the CNCF OpenFeature project so that I don't have to learn a vendor-specific SDK to integrate my codebase with Optimizely resulting in faster adoption of Optimizely in my applications

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. In Flags, it is not possible to change the order of variants and have a different "Baseline" variation by default in the Results Page.
    Regardless the possible workaround (change the baseline variation from the results page, the proper behaviour would be to being able to switch the order of the variants (and so decide what the default "Baseline" variant is directly in the Flags Page.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Clients wants to be able to have an approval workflow before a flag or test is started. They do this because they want to ensure that someone needs to get approval before changing the configuration of a flag to ensure a second pair of eyes before changes are made (similar to approving code changes.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?