Skip to content

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

CMS PaaS (Content Management System)

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

96 results found

  1. Provide self service tooling to allow for customers to complete this activity directly. Given the high volume of requests Service Desk processes for this activity it is clear that customers and parters have a desire for this kind of utility in the platform.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. It would be useful to be able to edit live documents in the library that can then be added to tasks or campaigns before they are completed.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. When we create a folder in the library, it would be good to be able to add the whole folder to a task or campaign rather than single assets.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. When editing in CMS, it takes a couple of clicks to open and close menus, hit publish. It'd be very helpful if we could just hit a keyboard combo to publish a page after an edit

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Research & Design  ·  0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. It would be helpful to Enhance the Deployment API to allow passing a parameter to clear CDN cache after deployment completes.
    Reference: https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/digital-experience-platform/docs/deploy-using-powershell

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. When adding a time from a Date/Time-picker in the CMS, you select one value, and then another value displays out on the website.
    This is because you display UTC in the CMS and the browser then changes the time to local time out on the web. However this is extremely cumbersome for editors, since they need first of all be aware of this, and second of all think one extra step.
    It would therefore be great if there was a solution for this, for example a setting to always display local time inside the CMS.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. It would be nice to be able to filter the selection of blocks to be created using the "Add local block" button in TinyMCE in the same way as when creating a new page or adding a block in a content area.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. In the Settings area anyone with the "CMSAdmin" or "Content Admins" has access to the full rights to edit anything in here.
    We should be able to set granular rights to these function areas for example if I want a specific user group to be able to make updates to Content Types but not Manage Website and Access Right this should be possible

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. When you click edit on a block inside TinyMCE the CMS navigates to the content. It would be nice for editors to offer an option to quick edit blocks like you can do for blocks inside Content Areas

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. It would be helpful to content editors if SaaS had a validation option for text or in general where we can chose to show a warning message instead of it always being an error.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Hi there
    In the same way the CMP can integrate with Jira and Teams, can it also integrate with Microsoft Planner please.
    Thanks
    Lisa

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Is there a way to track or identify the user who modified the access rights in Episerver/CMS? It appears that someone has changed the access permissions using the 'Set Access Rights' feature.
    We need to determine who made these changes to ensure proper access control and prevent unauthorized modifications. Is there any audit log, system event tracking, or CMS activity history that can help us trace the user responsible for this action? Any insights or recommendations on how to retrieve this information would be greatly appreciated.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Research & Design  ·  1 comment  ·  Reports  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Audience groups should include the dependent items that use them, similar to blocks, this will give visibility to authors on all the effect areas where that personalization was used when a change is made

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. As a Content Manager, I want to be able to translate pages with an exclusion list which prevents specific words and terms (e.g. Brand Names, Product Names in content, and Block/Image/Object Names (i.e. Internal Objects which need to be in my native language to administer from being translated.
    Currently, the add-on translates key terms and names and the content manager needs to identify these and translate them back again, but these changes are subsequently lost if the content is re-translated. By managing these globally through a dictionary (or a setting, for Block Names, etc, this would massively improve the admin…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. When creating child pages and moving them to be the same level as the parent results in duplicate url, alert the author that moving will result in a duplicate url and require the author to make a change.
    Steps to recreate:
    1. create a parent page titled Monday Tips (url ends with /monday.tips
    2. create a child page called Monday Tips (url ends with /monday.tips/monday.tips
    3. moving the child page to be a at the same level as the parent would result in a duplicate url (/monday.tips. Opti doesn't allow duplicates and appends a numeric value to the end of…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. When I inherit from ContentProvider I need to override LoadContent and LoadChildrenReferencesAndTypes. These two methods are not async which means that I can't use async/await in those methods. If below methods existed I could override them instead and use async/await in my implementation.
    Task<IContent?> LoadContentAsync
    Task<IList<GetChildrenReferenceResult>> LoadChildrenReferencesAndTypesAsync
    I know I can use Task.Run( to call async methods but It's not recommended.
    Here is some guidelines from David Fowler who works with .NET at Microsoft.https://github.com/davidfowl/AspNetCoreDiagnosticScenarios/blob/master/AsyncGuidance.md#avoid-using-taskresult-and-taskwait

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. We are running a setup with a separate edit and frontend servers.
    When assets are added to Optimizely Graph, the asset URL is always updated to be the edit server URL?not the frontend server. At first, I thought this was a mistake, but having dug into the code I see it?s intentional.
    The RewriteAssetHostInitialization (Optimizely.ContentGraph.Cms.NetCore.Core explicitly switches the host for assets from the frontend to the edit server.
    Could we make this optional via a configuration option?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. We have a client that wants to only give users only access to certain tools in the CMS/Admin area, IE the ability to Import/Export.
    To the best of my knowledge this permission is specified in the EPiServer.CMS.Admin.UI module and is set to episerver:cmsadmin.
    I've attempted to override settings using our own instance of AdminModule, but haven't had any luck. I know I can intercept/remove MenuItems, but I believe I will be unable to prevent users from actual accessing the content with a URL.
    It would be great to be able to set these permissions at a more granular level at…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. We need a way of deploying the current content and blobs from our production environment to a lower environment of our choosing in our CMS SaaS instance. We should have the option to completely replace all of the data that is currently in the lower environment as well.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Scrolling for this property is too fast on Macbook (testet Edge and Chrome:
    [UIHint("TimeOnly"]
    public virtual DateTime? StartTime { get; set; }
    Adjusting scroll in mouse settings doesn't help.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5
  • Don't see your idea?