Skip to content

CMS SaaS (Content Management System)



CMS SaaS (Content Management System)

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

36 results found

  1. When viewing a page on the live/front end there is no edit button and no back button, so authors must open a new tab or navigate away and re-find the page in the CMS to make a change. Request: allow a logged-in user to jump straight into editing from the live page via an edit button. Our current platform supports this and it significantly speeds up routine edits.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. After saving a modified component, the editor returns to the page level instead of staying at the component just edited. When editing several components in sequence, this forces the author to re-locate and re-open the next component each time, interrupting flow. Request: after save, keep focus at the component level (or return to the edited component) so authors can continue editing adjacent components efficiently.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Component nesting is currently flat: a component can only be dropped inside another component if that nesting was purpose-built into the component definition. Authors cannot nest components arbitrarily at edit time. Request: allow authors to drop components inside other components' content areas without each nesting relationship being pre-built by a developer. Our previous platform allowed this flexibility, which matters for building richer layouts without custom development for every combination.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Currently, when we try to publish and some required properties are missing from an experience or a component from the experience outline, we only see a simple validation message that the property is missing. The problem is that we might have that property on many components and we can't tell from the validation message alone which is the component that causes the problem, so we have to manually find it.

    It would be great to also include the component name in the validation message.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Editors cannot choose which head (localhost/dev/qa) to preview a page in - only one endpoint is available and tightly coupled.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Problem
    In Optimizely CMS (SaaS) there is currently no way for content editors to generate a long-lived, shareable preview link for unpublished/draft content that external stakeholders can open without a CMS / Opti ID account.
    Current limitations:

    The official preview token expires in only 5–10 minutes.
    The only official recommendation is to give stakeholders limited CMS access so they can open the page in Visual Builder themselves.
    This creates friction for external reviews (clients, legal, marketing stakeholders, executives, agencies, etc.) and forces customers to either:
    Maintain a separate staging environment, or
    Build custom workarounds.

    This was a solved problem on…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Adding an optional toggle to allow Longstring properties to display as Text areas for CMS editors would be useful.

    22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. When I have multiple languages of my site and I want to retain the outline of my Experience of all languages this is currently not synced. When I move sections around I have to manually do this for every language.

    We would like an option to keep the outline in sync for all languages, and only adjust the translations

    Currently Experiences are not an option for sites that use multiple languages but are managed by a single team that wants the same structure. They are better off using Pages

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. There should be an undo button that restores the visual builder page to its state before a new section was added or modified.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. For content managers and editors, it is essential to have the ability to preview pages across multiple device types. Currently, this functionality is limited to Experience Types only.

    This is a significant gap, as standard pages are also being created and previewed within the Visual Builder. Enabling multi-device preview for these pages would greatly enhance the content editing and validation experience for editors and managers.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Editors cannot choose which head (localhost/dev/qa) to preview a page in - only one endpoint is available and tightly coupled.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. When using Opti SaaS to create a new page that includes a period, the resulting URL segment also contains the period. For example, if you create a page titled "Online on Oct. 4," the URL segment generated will be "online-on-oct.-4," which may render the page inaccessible. It is recommended that the SaaS product automatically remove periods from the URL segment when creating pages.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Request for SaaS CMS to support 'categories' or a comparable taxonomy at the block level.

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. When editing a DateTime property in the CMS Content Types panel the date time is using my local format of dd/mm/yyyy. When a CMS Editor edits on the page the DateTime format changed to mm/dd/yyyy. It would be nice if DateTime pickers used the users local DateTime format throughout the CMS.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. It would be helpful to content editors if SaaS had a validation option for text or in general where we can chose to show a warning message instead of it always being an error.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
2 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?