Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1776

Add LaunchDarkly to allowedLibraries whitelist

Hi, Out customer indicated they would like to unify the feature flags and feature experimentation software they use over multiple software applications, which also include software maintained by other partners next to ourselves. They already use L...

Paas Portal Microsoft Teams Deployments Cards

EPI Team, We would like to receive Microsoft Teams deployments cards from the Paas Portal . This is a valuable information for the teams in the field during a release cycle. At date only the person who trigger the deployment receive an email. 1 - ...
over 3 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Code deployment 10 Investigating

Add rule type property to decision object

While the decision object allows you to see which rule delivered a feature, it does not specify whether this rule is an A/B Test, Targeted Delivery, etc. Customer naming conventions could theoretically provide this kind of context, but we've recei...
16 days ago in Feature Experimentation / APIs / Experiment Authoring / Feature Flagging Workflows / SDKs & Agent 0 Future consideration

Enable selection of datetime format on DateTime block in EPiServer.Forms

The current implementation of the DateTime element (found in the EpiServer.Forms.Samples package) appears to be insufficient. In the DateTimeElementBlock.js file, the logic used to determine the language format relies on the browser's language set...
16 days ago in Content Management / Forms 1

Configured Commerce Spire + CMP Publishing Integration

Talking with Configured Commerce Customer who is interested in CMP. They have a Marketing Team of ~20 and larger team which provides input of Marketing Materials at ~100. We would love a publishing connection between CMP and Configured Commerce Sp...
9 days ago in Configured Commerce / CMS, Spire & Mobius / Integration 1 Gathering interest

Add support for related objects in behavioral activation campaign templates

We would like to be able to use activation campaigns in behavioral mode in the same way as we can do in one-time or recurring campaigns. We have a custom channel app that uses the data mapping template where we select fields from customer object a...
10 days ago in Data Platform App 0

Integration with Voyado for loyalty

We have many joint customers, and although Voyado also have a CDP, integrating with their loyalty system would benefit our joint customers and show how well our platforms play together. By integrating, using RTS, the loyalty data on Voyado would b...
almost 2 years ago in Integrations 0 Investigating

Show/Hide logic for Work Request forms

We would like the ability to show or hide different fields in a Work Request form based on a user selected drop down. For example, if a user selects Website Update from the Request Type dropdown, only fields in section Website Update would display...
3 months ago in Content Marketing / Requests 3

Easy migration of templates/fields from one instance to another

We would like to have a possibility to easily migrate templates and/or fields created in one instance (e.g., test instance) to production instance. This would allow us to save a lot of time that is now spent on recreating a setup in prod that is a...
19 days ago in Content Marketing / Miscellaneous 0

Please whitelist .NET native library Azure.Storage.Common

You have whitelisted the following Azure libraries but not Azure.Storage.Common: Azure.Core Azure.Identity Azure.Storage.Blobs Could you please whitelist Azure.Storage.Common as this is a Microsoft .NET native library and we need it to upload file...