Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

Status Gathering interest
Created by Guest
Created on May 6, 2024

Add LaunchDarkly to allowedLibraries whitelist

Hi,

Out customer indicated they would like to unify the feature flags and feature experimentation software they use over multiple software applications, which also include software maintained by other partners next to ourselves.

They already use LaunchDarkly for other software in their stack, and would also like to include their webshop build on Optimizely Configured Commerce to use LaunchDarkly for their feature flags and experimentations.

Therefore we want to be able to include the following NuGet Package into the Extenstion project for this customer:
https://www.nuget.org/packages/LaunchDarkly.ServerSdk

At this moment the PowerShell script validateReferences.ps1 which uses the whitelist of packages in the file allowedLibraries.json is preventing us to include this package in our Extensions project.

Based on the described Policy here:
https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/configured-commerce/docs/third-party-library-policy
We are now filing this request here, in the hope to get this approved.

Kind regards,

Kasper de Boer

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 8, 2024

    Ex-Ex Sara!

    Let your customers go wild in Extensions with whatever they want :)

  • Optimizely
    Sara Winter
    Reply
    |
    Nov 8, 2024

    Thank you for submitting this request. While we have this item in our backlog for future consideration, we have determined that in order to support this it would require significant changes to our existing build process that we are not able to undertake at this time.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 7, 2024

    pretty please with sugar on top!