Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1864

Filter tasks by assigned teams in plan view

We would like to be able to filter tasks/campaigns in CMP by assignee->teams with the action just pulling in tasks/campaigns that have been assigned to that specific team. The current functionality pulls in all task/campaigns that assigned to a...
3 months ago in Content Management / Reporting 0

ODP-Campaign Sync: Increase frequency of sync from once a day to... more than once a day

At this time, ODP-Campaigns integration syncs once a day, can we increase this frequency
about 1 year ago in Campaign 0 Future consideration

Add activity logging into Form Submissions for EpiServer Forms

As GDPR administrator i would like to know who was viewing, editing data that has been sent via EpiServer Forms. This is why all actions such: - display form submissions - download form submissions report - deleted submitted data in Form Submissio...
about 4 years ago in Content Management / Forms 0 Future consideration

Hierarchical appsettings support for 'Manage app settings'

After trying out the new 'Manage app settings' feature in the DXP portal. Not sure if hierarchical named app settings are supported. Due to the app setting name input field not allowing the separator '__' (double underscores). (See .NET 6 environm...
almost 2 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform 2 Already exists

Trashcan

Occasionally, we have a user delete something (an asset version, a whole task, etc.) that they shouldn't have. Luckily, your support team always seems to be able to get it back. But it would be valuable to have a trash can so that we don't waste t...
about 2 years ago in Content Marketing / Miscellaneous 4 Future consideration

CMS Editor - Allowed Types - Restriction Info

In the CMS Editor, when a content area has AllowedTypes specified, it always lists types that are not allowed in the hint text. However, the list that's not allowed is not complete. We expect the only the types that are allowed to be listed. Examp...
6 months ago in Content Management / Editing 0

Separate the "build email" step from the "send email" step for easier extensibility

As a partner developerI want to have a point of extension between building an email and sending an emailSo that I can modify the email properties (ie. To, CC, Body) without overriding the code responsible for sending the email. The following files...
about 1 month ago in Configured Commerce / Technical 3 Gathering interest

Paasportal does not support different levels of access on Production

It would be very helpful to have different levels of access to Production on Paasportal. We do not want everyone to have the ability to deploy, but it would be helpful to grant access to QA to view logs and other troubleshooting functionality.
about 2 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform 0 Future consideration

Add an option to DXC for a NodeJS server in addition to an Episerver instance

I want to have a NodeJS server running on Azure, alongside my Episerver instance. To start, this would be a simple, naked NodeJS instance. I could do whatever I like with this. It would be deployable apart from the Episerver instance -- I could pu...
over 4 years ago in Content Management / APIs / Technical 1 Investigating

Bypass approval sequence for admins

As an administrator I'd like to be able to publish content bypassing the approval sequence. Can there be a feature added to say which roles a particular approval sequence must follow?
almost 4 years ago in Content Management / Collaboration & Approval 5 Future consideration