Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1859

Wordpress Integration - Support Gutenberg Editor

Gutenberg editor is activated by default on Wordpress new versions which means most client use it in one way or another. We need to support it in order to integrate.
over 2 years ago in Content Marketing / Integrations 0 Investigating

Supporting Custom Javascript or some inbuilt functions in the Audience Builder

We would like to be able to perform some minimal data manipulation before matching when creating audiences. Either supporting custom javascript in Audience Builder in the Full Stack version, or accommodating common Javascript or optimizely custom ...
over 2 years ago in Feature Experimentation / SDKs & Agent 0 Future consideration

Ability to rename the "Holdback"-variation (and generate a preview URL for that)

Hi! As an Optimizely editor, I would like to be able to rename the "Holdback"-variation of a personalization campaign. We now have to create an additional variation (acting as the Holdback without changes) and rename that instead. In addition, it ...
over 2 years ago in Experimentation Analytics 2 Investigating

"Exclude" from Results using the Segment dropdown (instead of only being able to "include")

Hi! It would be nice to be able to use the "Segment"-dropdown in the "Results"-view of an experiment/campaign in such a way that we're able to choose certain items/options on which to exclude/filter from the results. At this moment, it is only pos...
over 2 years ago in Experimentation Analytics / Results Page 3 Investigating

Filter active audiences on GET Audiences API & Remove an audience

Hi! As an Optimizely editor, it would be nice to be able to remove an audience. Archiving is not enough, as archived audiences are also returned in the GET Audiences API (see https://library.optimizely.com/docs/api/app/v2/index.html#operation/list...
over 2 years ago in Web Experimentation / APIs 4 Future consideration

Approval comments to be more visible

As an approver I want comments I add to items during the review process to be highly visible to the user who submitted the changes . The outcome is that when a comment is added to an item during review - whether the item is approved or declined -...
over 4 years ago in Content Management / Collaboration & Approval 0 Future consideration

New workflow button needed

Need a button that allows "Approved with changes"
almost 2 years ago in Content Marketing / Settings + Configuration / Tasks, Campaigns, and Events 0 Future consideration

Ability to add Watchers to Routing Rules

When definining Routing Rules, it would be great to have the ability to add Watchers for the rule (similar to the "Notification Recipient"). This use case is needed when the watcher is not actively involved in the work request, but should be autom...
almost 2 years ago in Content Marketing / Settings + Configuration 2 Future consideration

Significance notifications

Customer wanted notifications when a test hit significance instead of having to check all the time
over 2 years ago in Experiment Collaboration and Management / Notifications 0 Planned

Ability to create responsive fields (autofill logic)

We have several fields in our instance that are tied to each other, and it would be great to have certain fields auto-populate based on the information put into a certain field. Logic would be something like "if field X = ABC, fill field Y with 12...
11 months ago in Content Management / Personalization 1