Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1764

Azure Queue / Service Bus for Message Handling

CDN logs are exposed to us via SAS URI with read Permissions. However if Episerver could consider exposing the Azure Queue / Service Bus that will be a complete solution that helps us consume the logs from Queue., instead of designing a solution f...
over 3 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Telemetry 1 Future consideration

Support OpenFeature

As a developer I want to be able to use an Optimizely provider for the CNCF OpenFeature project so that I don't have to learn a vendor-specific SDK to integrate my codebase with Optimizely resulting in faster adoption of Optimizely in my applications
11 months ago in Feature Experimentation / SDKs & Agent 0 Future consideration

Parent campaign inherits status from sub campaigns

If you have a parent campaign with 5 sub-campaigns that are all in progress, the parent campaign will show as 'not started'. This is a design flaw since the parent campaign doesnt inherit the campaign status from the sub-campaigns. The parent camp...
11 months ago in Content Marketing 2 Future consideration

In-Progress Status for Work Requests

It's currently not possible to tell which requests have active work happening in tasks/campaigns based on existing statuses (accepted doesn't necessarily mean work is being done.) It would be great if we could have an in-progress status just like ...
almost 2 years ago in Content Marketing / Requests 1 Future consideration

Reassign tasks

As an approver I want to assign or reassign workflow tasks to users So that I can better manage publishing requirements and dates. The outcome is that as admins we have the ability to assign a review item to a particular content author.
about 4 years ago in Content Management / Collaboration & Approval 1 Future consideration

Do not let Library Role users add assets to the Library via the Download image as Custom option

We are finding that Library role users (our regular employee base) are accidently adding images to our Library. In order to obtain an image size they want, they chose "Download As" and then "Custom". The "Save" button does not work for them (brows...
11 months ago in Content Marketing / DAM/Library 1 Investigating

Ability for our customers to add and remove client users

Ability for our customers to add and remove client users. Atm if an employee leaves or joins, they will have to request for that person to be added or removed from the personalisation portal. This will either be carried out by the CSM, or the CSM ...
almost 2 years ago in Product Recommendations / Portal 0

Step duration on sub-steps

We would like to be able to add step durations to sub-steps. The total of the durations for the sub-steps should equal the total for the main step.
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing / Settings + Configuration 0 Future consideration

Add Generics Support to Various Attributes

C# 11 added support for attributes with generics. It would be nice to be able to use that with various Optimizely attributes. Some examples of attribute I can think of this can be added to are SelectOne, SelectMany and ModuleDependency. [SelectOne...
6 months ago in Content Management / Technical 0

Archive Notification for task Watchers

When a task is archived, a notification is sent to all watchers assigned to the task.