Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1753

GraphQL api

We're looking at integrating some data from CMP into other systems (like our optimizely.com CMS instance and PowerBI) and if we need to pull that information now, the "campaign" object in the API is pretty rigid (I can't ask for fields for instanc...
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing / Settings + Configuration 0 Future consideration

Migrate Content Manager and Grid View to version 12

Hi,The GridView and Content Manager needs to be migrated to version 12. Without a product switcher it isn't possible to get to the Content Manager. Bart asked me to create a ticket on this. Thanks for looking into this.
8 months ago in Content Management / Content Manager 0

Better reporting functionality in CMS

Admin section (reports) good headlines/titles but functionality not good for broken links I want the ability to export to excel, or to be able to sort the list or update the list. I can’t configure or mark what has been checked and would like e.g....
about 5 years ago in Content Management / Reporting 0 Future consideration

Enhance CMP CMS connector to support multiple sites per CMS codebase instance

Currently the first version of the CMP to CMS connector only support a scenario of one codebase to CMP instance. Therefore if a client has multiple CMP instances connected to different multisite instances in the CMS this does not work. For example...
8 months ago in Content Marketing / CMS + CMP Publishing 1 Investigating

Optimizely CMS page preview needs multiple visitor-groups

Hello, i'm missing the possibility to select multiple visitor-groups in the preview-mode of a page. You can only select one: We often have the use-case that a block is only visible for desktop users and this block has also personalizations, so con...
about 3 years ago in Content Management / Technical 0

Title missing on images in the Text editing fields

The mouse-over titles are missing in images added in the Text editing fields. This is a normal feature on all CMS:s so it's strange that I can't see it. This would help me make more accessible web content.
over 4 years ago in Content Management / Editing 1 Future consideration

It should be possible to test Marketing Automations with dry run mode

You can only test marketing automation by using short-term waiting nodes, but very complex concepts remain prone to errors because they are difficult to test. A dry run mode would help creating more confidence that the set up Marketing Automation ...
almost 5 years ago in Campaign 0 Investigating

Additional UWG7 compliant strategies needed (DACH Market)

In Germany there is a law allowing targeted marketing to active customers under specific constraints, regulated by law (UWG §7). These come with a wide recipient base, because no newsletter opt-in is needed an offer a high value business case. Def...
over 2 years ago in Product Recommendations / Email Personalization 2 Investigating

Salesforce CRM <> ODP Integration

Send data from Salesforce CRM to ODPSend segmented customer data from odp to SFDC
almost 2 years ago in Integrations 0 Planned

ability to archive assets with upload

As a B2B users, we're constantly updating datasheets and tech drawings for products when the manufacturers make updates to their documents. We can overwrite some of the documents. It would be helpful to be able to upload a list to archive document...
3 months ago in PIM 0