Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1782

Scheduled re-import of indexed content

As a site owner using Content Recommendations, I would like the ability to schedule re-import of already indexed content in Content Recs, so that: a) there would be no need for manually triggering a re-scan, e.g. if we add or change metatag or dat...
over 3 years ago in Content Recommendations 3 Future consideration

Search capability missing from select page or block dialog.

If site has thousands pages and blocks, it is very difficult to select correct page or block to link each other. Current you have to browse via tree to find correct content to create link or select block. Select page or content dialog should have ...
5 months ago in Content Management / Editing 0

Support for Managed Identity in EPiServer.Azure

We are hosting Optimizely CMS in Azure for some customers so we are using the EPiServer.Azure nuget package for connection to Azure Storage Account and Azure Service Bus. To do this we have use the SAS key connection string. Are there any plans to...
over 1 year ago in Content Management / Technical 0

Back In Stock Trigger

an OMVP has asked about adding a "back in stock" trigger functionality to email/trigger messages. The trigger would work something like: User first browses product on site which is out of stock A day or sometime later the product is now back in st...

Trashcan

Occasionally, we have a user delete something (an asset version, a whole task, etc.) that they shouldn't have. Luckily, your support team always seems to be able to get it back. But it would be valuable to have a trash can so that we don't waste t...
almost 2 years ago in Content Marketing / Miscellaneous 4 Future consideration

Field Groups missing functionalty

Hello - recently you introduced the idea of field groups. Conceptually I like this feature. BUT, it is currently only available to add to an asset. With all the field inheritance, it would be really great if I could add a group of fields on a task...
about 1 month ago in Content Marketing / Tasks, Campaigns, and Events 1 Future consideration

Download bulk assets from 'Media' tab

Ability to download any folder of assets, single asset or multiple assets from media tab.
about 1 month ago in Content Management / Content Manager 0

Restrict editor access to other microsites

We want to hide the website tree structure to the user who do not have access (even we want to remove the read-only access). For example we have multiple websites as Website A, Website B ... etc. and EditorA, EditorB ... etc. If EditorA has access...
4 months ago in Content Management / Multi-site 0

A true unpublish option or the ability to schedule the end of expiration

A true unpublish option would be a huge asset to the CMS. If that's not possible (or at least not possible soon), then the ability to schedule an end to expiration should work. It might sound like a small thing, but being able to unpublish and the...
7 months ago in Content Management / Content Manager 0

Request for limited support regarding Azure Storage Queue hosted by DXP

We have a solution that is live now with a large customer and multiple integrations. Storage Queue is being leveraged to elevate the delays of processing data into Opti. We noticed we don't have access to delete or update the queues (though we wer...
almost 2 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Data management 0 Future consideration