Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1660

Trashcan

Occasionally, we have a user delete something (an asset version, a whole task, etc.) that they shouldn't have. Luckily, your support team always seems to be able to get it back. But it would be valuable to have a trash can so that we don't waste t...
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing / Miscellaneous 4 Future consideration

Paasportal does not support different levels of access on Production

It would be very helpful to have different levels of access to Production on Paasportal. We do not want everyone to have the ability to deploy, but it would be helpful to grant access to QA to view logs and other troubleshooting functionality.
over 1 year ago in DXP Cloud Platform 0 Future consideration

Request for limited support regarding Azure Storage Queue hosted by DXP

We have a solution that is live now with a large customer and multiple integrations. Storage Queue is being leveraged to elevate the delays of processing data into Opti. We noticed we don't have access to delete or update the queues (though we wer...
over 1 year ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Data management 0 Future consideration

Add validation notifications on property tabs and property labels

When editing a page/block, the property validation feature is great to prevent editors publishing an incomplete or sub-optimal piece of content. However, the validation notification is only shown near the Publish dropdown menu, and the editor then...
over 1 year ago in Content Management / Editing 0

Support for handling historical order data

There are 30-something order tables which are associated with orders (including line item, payments, addresses etc). Over time these tables grow very large, which affects not only the size of the tables but also the indexes. Customers that have ru...
4 months ago in Customized Commerce / Orders 0 Gathering interest

Task async/await support for scheduled jobs

The scheduled jobs are executed as tasks by the scheduled job executor (IScheduledJobExecutor). However the Execute method that is required to create and run a custom job does not support return type Task or Task<T> and therefore the async/a...
almost 3 years ago in Content Management / Technical 2 Future consideration

Customization entry point on GetCartResult sub DTO's

Hello, Recently we had to add a custom property to the ShipVias, and making that new property available on the updateCart API was very inneficient. If we look at the GetCartResult class, there's a lot of sub dto's used that are not extensible with...
about 1 month ago in Configured Commerce / Technical 0

Translation of List<T> and LinkCollection item in page is not supported on netframework version (CMS 11)

For stringlist and linkitemcollection properties, we could see the values are just duplicated and not translated to native text during the auto translate of page. The issue is reproducible in Alloy solution and attached the evidence for the same. ...
about 1 month ago in Content Management / Multi-language 0

Move render-blocking EpiserverForms JavaScript out of document head

Google PageSpeed Insights reports the WebResource.axd containing the Episerver injected JavaScript in the page head is render-blocking. jQuery here, loaded as a dependency of the Episerver Forms js blocks page rendering by an estimated 300ms dimin...
about 3 years ago in Content Management / Forms 2 Investigating

Restrict Template Access by Teams

As an Admin, we want to restrict access to certain Work Request or Task Briefs by user group / teams. Some user groups should only see 1 or 2 request types, and we don't want them to be able to see our entire list and accidently select one that is...
7 months ago in Content Marketing / Requests 0