Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1648

Paasportal does not support different levels of access on Production

It would be very helpful to have different levels of access to Production on Paasportal. We do not want everyone to have the ability to deploy, but it would be helpful to grant access to QA to view logs and other troubleshooting functionality.
over 1 year ago in DXP Cloud Platform 0 Future consideration

Request for limited support regarding Azure Storage Queue hosted by DXP

We have a solution that is live now with a large customer and multiple integrations. Storage Queue is being leveraged to elevate the delays of processing data into Opti. We noticed we don't have access to delete or update the queues (though we wer...
over 1 year ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Data management 0 Future consideration

Need to have “Create block” link on Form Content area property on Form block (Ticket referrence #1405503 )

No description provided
about 1 month ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Data management 0

ServiceApi Media service XML support for complex types

Currently we are using ServiceApi and Media service to upload assets to all entry types in one of our customer' integration solution. This has proven to work quite well but misses one import feature as our assets require a property type that is no...
3 months ago in Customized Commerce / Technical 0 Gathering interest

Restrict Template Access by Teams

As an Admin, we want to restrict access to certain Work Request or Task Briefs by user group / teams. Some user groups should only see 1 or 2 request types, and we don't want them to be able to see our entire list and accidently select one that is...
6 months ago in Content Marketing / Requests 0

Task async/await support for scheduled jobs

The scheduled jobs are executed as tasks by the scheduled job executor (IScheduledJobExecutor). However the Execute method that is required to create and run a custom job does not support return type Task or Task<T> and therefore the async/a...
almost 3 years ago in Content Management / Technical 2 Future consideration

Set Content Type properties by code

The names of some properties are not directly tied to the name of something in code. The property Display In Edit View is controlled with the [ScaffoldColumn(false)] attribute in code. Specifically, we're looking at "new" properties on Content Are...
4 months ago in Content Management 0

Freight app rather than individual setup

Rather than setting up each freight carrier individually, it would be great if Optimizely linked to a freight app out of the box. ShipperHQ.com makes it easy to link to the individual carriers and use rules base pricing and routing. "ShipperHQ is ...
about 1 month ago in Configured Commerce / Integration 1 Gathering interest

Email Signup options and request for pop-up/overlay

We are looking to have an email sign up button and pop up
about 1 month ago in Configured Commerce / CMS, Spire & Mobius 1 Gathering interest

In the Global Search, tasks that are "On Hold" should populate in the search results

Our users rely heavily on the Global Search bar to find their tasks. We've discovered that tasks in a status of "On Hold" do not populate in the Global Search results. Optimizely support informed us this was by design, as the global search bar tre...
2 months ago in Content Marketing / Miscellaneous 0