Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 10 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

FILTER BY CATEGORY

All feedback

Showing 319

Performs a rolling restart of App Service instances via the PASS portal

Could you please consider to add "Rolling Restarts" option under the "Troubleshoot" section of the PaaS portal, so that we can perform a rolling restart of App Service instances ourselves.
almost 2 years ago in DXP Cloud Services / Code deployment 4 Future consideration

webhook for "message received" event

Why do we need to receive a webhook once a message is "received"? With a "received" webhook we would be notified as soon as a message was accepted by the receiving mail server. Our business processes are mainly interested if a message could be del...
over 2 years ago in Campaign 1 Future consideration

Sub-folders ability to hold assets / Folder filter

When you organize your assets on sub-folders on the Library the assets remain loose on the main folder as well. This causes confusion and clutter. When you use the filters to show just ‘folders’ this issue is ‘corrected’ but when you go into the f...
4 months ago in Content Marketing / DAM/Library 1 Future consideration

Exclude the hostnames in manage websites when using PaaS Portal to copy database and blobs between environments

For CMS customers that need to copy database and blobs using PaaS Portal, the environment-specific web hostnames (Admin > Config tab > Manage Websites) become overwritten. Therefore, users wishing to view content in the preproduction system ...
over 1 year ago in DXP Cloud Services / Infrastructure mgmt. 2 Future consideration

Add activity logging into Form Submissions for EpiServer Forms

As GDPR administrator i would like to know who was viewing, editing data that has been sent via EpiServer Forms. This is why all actions such: - display form submissions - download form submissions report - deleted submitted data in Form Submissio...
over 2 years ago in Content Management / Forms 0 Future consideration

Compress Workflow Builder

The interface when building/editing workflows makes it really difficult to see more than one step (the text box is unnecessarily large). I would love the ability to compress the view so I can get a better overview and move steps around quicker.
4 months ago in Content Marketing / Settings + Configuration 3 Future consideration

Task async/await support for scheduled jobs

The scheduled jobs are executed as tasks by the scheduled job executor (IScheduledJobExecutor). However the Execute method that is required to create and run a custom job does not support return type Task or Task<T> and therefore the async/a...
over 1 year ago in Content Management / Technical 2 Future consideration

Hide broken links on expired content from Link Status report

Currently, the Link Status report shows broken links that are present on expired pages. I would prefer it if broken links on expired content could be excluded from the report. This could be configurable. Jira ticket
over 2 years ago in Content Management / Technical 1 Future consideration

Allow experimentation for email trigger campaigns

As a marketer I want to test different triggers and different prioritization against each other and get reports about scenario A and B. For this I'd like to set up an independet set of triggers (set B) with prioritisations and select a %, a set of...
over 2 years ago in Product Recommendations / Email Personalization / Experimentation 0 Future consideration

Bypass approval sequence for admins

As an administrator I'd like to be able to publish content bypassing the approval sequence. Can there be a feature added to say which roles a particular approval sequence must follow?
about 2 years ago in Content Management / Collaboration & Approval 3 Future consideration