Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1878 of 1878

Process the line level properties in Service API requests

Currently Service API doesn't allow to migrate the line item level properties if you import orders (by calling '/episerverapi/commerce/orders' endpoint). It seems like pretty important ability on a par with order/shipment level custom properties. ...
almost 3 years ago in Customized Commerce / Technical 2 Gathering interest

Hide/Remove warning icon for 'Published'

We use Epi11, on our way to Epi12 - this issue is visible on both of them. We use tag pages to tag regular content pages. The tag pages are editable only for Admin, while the content pages are used by people with Editor access. But our editors get...
almost 3 years ago in Content Management / Editing 0

When adding multiple audiences to a rule, don't default to matching ANY

When you add multiple audiences to a new rule, the default is to match ANY of the selected audiences. We always want to match ALL of the selected audiences, but our users often forget to change ANY to ALL. They put their experiment live and don't ...
almost 3 years ago in Feature Experimentation 0 Future consideration

PIM - Improvement to digital assets upload process

Managing digital assets is one of the features of PIM. For entire catalog products, digital assets volume is very large. PIM only allows uploading digital assets through browser(confirmed with Optimizely #885640), which is not reliable for large v...
almost 3 years ago in PIM 4 Gathering interest

Error in OOTB P21:07 - Order History Step 2 SQL

I've noticed an error in the OOTB sql script for the Order History - Order Detail job step. Navigate to the following link and review the WHERE clause. The final statement has oh.date_last_modified twice and I believe one of these should be ol.dat...
almost 3 years ago in Configured Commerce / Orders & Payment 0 Investigating

Simply Field Addition on Task

There are too many steps in order to search for the individual labels at task creation: I want to select two labels for a task that fall in two fields, I have to do the following: Open Fields chevron drop down arrow Click “Add Field” button Scroll...
almost 3 years ago in Content Marketing / Tasks, Campaigns, and Events 0 Future consideration

Add Seach Within Query to Data Layer (for Analytics)

We're able to track queries entered into the main Site Search bar via Google Analytics (and Opti Analytics), however, the Search Within keywords are not able to be tracked. The API call within the main Site Search separates the keyword entered in ...
almost 3 years ago in Configured Commerce / CMS, Spire & Mobius / Search 1 Gathering interest

Filter 'My Tasks' Panel by 'Created by Me'

Task creators are responsible for ensuring tasks do not become overdue, not task assignees. This means that task creators need a quick and easy way to be able to see tasks that they have created specifically in the My Tasks panel (from top navigat...
almost 3 years ago in Content Marketing / Miscellaneous 0 Future consideration

Password expiration settings

Right now, in the admin console there isn't the possibility to set password expiration rules. For example, password should expire every 30 hours/days/weeks and the new password shouldn't be like any previous one. It would be great if these setting...
almost 3 years ago in Configured Commerce / Users, Permissions & Security 2 Investigating

Restrict the usage of EPiServer.Marketing.Testing add on

We would like to deny the create A/B test access for specific users having publish access.
almost 3 years ago in Content Management / Technical 0