Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1568 of 1568

Editing Single LinkItem

This is related to support ticket: #1080141 In version 12.15.1 at least, when you add a property to a page or block that is a LinkItem (As opposed to a LinkItemCollection) the 'Edit' option takes you to the target of the link, instead of allowing ...
about 1 year ago in Content Management / Technical 0

Status and potential error log for Recommendation feed parser

The products list is fetched by the Product Recommendations engine and parsed. This parsing may fail, but there is no way to check this from the portal without contacting support (who also have no easy way of checking if there is an error). This w...
almost 2 years ago in Product Recommendations / Technical 2 Already exists

Support CSP with nonce in Edit, Admin etc

It would be great if developers can configure CSP to use nonce. So that they can increase the security and control of what resources are loaded by the application. Currently almost all script tags are rendered without CSP nonces and the site is br...
12 months ago in Content Management / APIs 2 Future consideration

Getting a (public) results sharing link via API

Suggested by a customer: "We are automatically exporting all our Optimizely running experiments to Slack and would like to add a link to the results of each experiment to that. As this should be accessible to all users and not only those with an O...
over 2 years ago in Experimentation Analytics 4 Planned

It should be possible to test Marketing Automations with dry run mode

You can only test marketing automation by using short-term waiting nodes, but very complex concepts remain prone to errors because they are difficult to test. A dry run mode would help creating more confidence that the set up Marketing Automation...
over 4 years ago in Campaign 0 Investigating

Better reporting functionality in CMS

Admin section (reports) good headlines/titles but functionality not good for broken links I want the ability to export to excel, or to be able to sort the list or update the list. I can’t configure or mark what has been checked and would like e.g....
over 4 years ago in Content Management / Reporting 0 Future consideration

Service API upload path and message storage

Upload path Currently Service API uploads import data to the web app disk. This is first of all problematic in a load balanced server setup. A file can be uploaded to one server but when the commit request is sent, there is no guarantee that it wi...
about 2 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Infrastructure mgmt. 1 Future consideration

Editing Cloudflare's custom error pages in DXP PaaS portal

In case of issues it's not looking good that the signature of error and challenge pages is Cloudflare. Customers want to control all content that could be served to their visitors. It would be very useful if an DXP administrator could upload or ed...
almost 3 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Infrastructure mgmt. 0 Future consideration

Database Audit Logs for Compliance

Could you please consider to add a new section with in the PaaS Portal (preferably under the "Troubleshoot" section) that can be used to view the DB access logs, that contains details such as, Who access the DB and when ? and What actions are carr...
about 3 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Data management 4 Planned

Title missing on images in the Text editing fields

The mouse-over titles are missing in images added in the Text editing fields. This is a normal feature on all CMS:s so it's strange that I can't see it. This would help me make more accessible web content.
about 4 years ago in Content Management / Editing 1 Future consideration