Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1721 of 1721

Significance notifications

Customer wanted notifications when a test hit significance instead of having to check all the time
over 2 years ago in Experiment Collaboration and Management / Notifications 0 Planned

Ability to apply behaviours and filters in Real Time Segments

We would really like to be able to apply behaviours and filters in Real Time Segments, could this be considered for the ODP roadmap
10 months ago in Data Platform App 0

Automated alert on the scheduler container (Linux).

Automated alert on the scheduler container (Linux). it seems not practical we have to check it every day. It will be great if they have alerts on container crashing/being not reachable similar to the ones for the website instance where Optimizely ...
over 1 year ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Infrastructure mgmt. 0 Future consideration

Allow for Search Stemming

There is no way to create stemming attributes for search. Meaning: if I want to return results for the word "accounting" but not "account", I cannot create a way to use the full term of "accounting". Other examples include ability to restrict sear...
over 1 year ago in Configured Commerce / Search 1 Gathering interest

Allow Search Redirects to go to External sites

We would like to be able to take customer search terms (ex: jobs, careers) to go to an external job listing site. Currently Opti only allows you to direct searches within the existing platform, so that a workaround causes the user to make multiple...
over 1 year ago in Search & Navigation 0

Improve possibilities to group larger quantities of items under the same node without affecting the URL segment

I want to be able to group content in "buckets" without affecting the URL. Container pages have been used, but this is not ideal since they add a URL segment and we want to try and avoid to remove this by tweaking into some central parts of routin...
about 4 years ago in Content Management / Editing 0 Future consideration

Create a way for filters to generate SEO-friendly URL

We noticed that the URLs generate with the attribute ID instead of the attribute value, making it very difficult to know which filters are most popular in analytics. Is it possible to make the filter URL more SEO friendly and include the name? Tha...
over 1 year ago in Commerce Analytics 0

IFS Aurena Integration - Getting Access Token

We are using the IFS Aurena Integration connector. We have a connection configured as documented. We are seeing the following error in the logs for real-time calls: "Bad Request. {"reference":"IDP-FoEOnbOD33dK","error_description":" Missing scope ...
10 months ago in Configured Commerce / Integration 2 Investigating

Toggle On and Off Scanning Feature

We would like customers to be able to have the ability to not have to hit "tap to scan" after scanning every item. It slows down the process for many customers. The ability to toggle on and off this feature would be fantastic.
over 1 year ago in Commerce Mobile App 1 Will not consider

Add Seach Within Query to Data Layer (for Analytics)

We're able to track queries entered into the main Site Search bar via Google Analytics (and Opti Analytics), however, the Search Within keywords are not able to be tracked. The API call within the main Site Search separates the keyword entered in ...
over 2 years ago in Configured Commerce / CMS, Spire & Mobius / Search 1 Gathering interest