Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 536

Hide broken links on expired content from Link Status report

Currently, the Link Status report shows broken links that are present on expired pages. I would prefer it if broken links on expired content could be excluded from the report. This could be configurable. Jira ticket
over 3 years ago in Content Management / Technical 1 Future consideration

Allow experimentation for email trigger campaigns

As a marketer I want to test different triggers and different prioritization against each other and get reports about scenario A and B. For this I'd like to set up an independet set of triggers (set B) with prioritisations and select a %, a set of...
over 3 years ago in Product Recommendations / Email Personalization / Experimentation 0 Future consideration

Dedicated email proofing so that subject line and inbox preview are displayed

We proof all of our marketing emails in the CMP. Currently, we have to take a screenshot of the subject line and email preview so that the team can review how it will appear in customer inboxes. It would be great to have a dedicated email proofing...
10 months ago in Content Marketing / Miscellaneous 0 Future consideration

Bypass approval sequence for admins

As an administrator I'd like to be able to publish content bypassing the approval sequence. Can there be a feature added to say which roles a particular approval sequence must follow?
about 3 years ago in Content Management / Collaboration & Approval 3 Future consideration

Move files directly from Content tab to Attachments

It would be very helpful if you had the ability to select files in the Content tab (e.g. alternate draft files) and MOVE them directly to the Attachments. Sometimes extra draft files end up in the Content tab. In order to keep them in the Task, yo...
6 months ago in Content Marketing / Tasks, Campaigns, and Events 2 Future consideration

Make "Additional properties" section optional when creating content

Currently non-required properties are listed under a section called "Additional properties" when creating content. This gives users the impression that those properties should be filled out before clicking the "Create" button. This is particularly...
10 months ago in Content Management / Editing 2 Future consideration

Visitor Groups / Personalization settings and Access Rights

I want to define visitor Groups & personalization settings per brand and define which users are authorized to access this (set access rights). Only users who are authorized can see the visitor groups and personalization settings.
over 4 years ago in Content Management / Personalization 1 Future consideration

Be able to use preset values for flag variables

As experimentation program owners, we'd like our fellow developers and experimenters to input "safe" values when filling out flag variables. For example colors and font sizes that match our design system. A preset list of values (created by an adm...
about 2 months ago in Feature Experimentation / Experiment Authoring 1 Future consideration

Add External URL as Asset to DAM

We'd like to be able to take the external URL content that we work on in Tasks and add it to the library to then be used in our sales portals. For example, sometimes I want to include a website that we have a partnership with but don't build ourse...
about 1 year ago in Content Marketing / DAM/Library 0 Future consideration

And/Or/Not Options in Filters

We'd love to see more control over how filters are applied, including the ability to choose "and", "or", and "not" logic. This would allow for more curated views, improving the end-user experience.
11 months ago in Content Marketing / DAM/Library / Plan 0 Future consideration