Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 557

Add attachments field to briefs and campaigns

The ability to add the Attachment field to a custom brief and/or a Campaign
about 1 year ago in Content Marketing 0 Future consideration

MAB traffic should be reset when cloning a MAB experiment

Currently, when cloning a MAB experiment, the traffic distribution among variations will be cloned as it is in the moment of cloning. As MAB experiments do not have an option to edit the traffic distribution because of their nature, the cloned exp...
over 1 year ago in Web Experimentation / Project / Account Configuration / Settings 0 Future consideration

Ability to Filter by Fields in Board View of Plan

Right now, we cannot filter out options in a field that we are looking at in the Board view. When we have a field with many options and we only want to view tasks for 3 of those options, we still have to view all of the options in the Board view.
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing / Plan 0 Future consideration

Auto-complete step if Assignee does not act on it

When a step has an Assignee and Due Date assigned, would be great to be able to configure in the workflow for a step to auto-complete if the assignee does not act on it within a certain time (i.e.: 48 or 24 hours). This would benefit the workflow ...
over 1 year ago in Content Management / Content Manager 0 Future consideration

Method to return if user is bucketed into an experiment

Create a method that returns a boolean to check if a user is in an experiment or not. Something similar to isFeatureEnabled, but for the whole experiment (for server side SDKs). I know that it could be built with some code, but having a simple isI...
over 1 year ago in Feature Experimentation / SDKs & Agent 1 Future consideration

Reports in CMS (12.18), use full width for result set.

Should be no need to breaking the broken link over five lines when there are so much space to use. So my suggestion is to use more width on the result grid to make the result more readable.
over 1 year ago in Content Management / Reporting 0 Future consideration

Custom Message for Sharing

When sharing assets or tasks, including a custom message written by the sender can help provide context to the recipient.
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing / Miscellaneous 1 Future consideration

Using standard "off" variation multiple times.

This feedback is on behalf of Vistaprint. - Mauricio Acebal and Lukas Vermeer. This feedback is related to the special treatment of the standard "Off" variation. Vistaprint are happy they are capable of turning off a variation without changing tra...
almost 2 years ago in Feature Experimentation / Feature Flagging Workflows 0 Future consideration

More intuitive design for managing features

I would like to add a few suggestions on behalf of Busra from Mural regarding a more intuitive design for managing features in our legacy platform: Have radio buttons instead of the "Status" drop-down menu on the Features tab Should not be able to...
almost 2 years ago in Feature Experimentation / Feature Flagging Workflows 1 Future consideration

Allow Add/Remove actions on task-level workflow edits

We'd like to be able to make updates to add/remove workflow step actions from directly on a task when editing a workflow.
over 2 years ago in Content Marketing / Settings + Configuration / Tasks, Campaigns, and Events 0 Future consideration