Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 487

Allow a singular, remaining sub-step to become the main step by retaining all its information

I noticed that if I have multiple sub-steps within a step and need to remove all but one, the remaining sub-step's information (step name, description) doesn't convert into a main step. Instead, the main step's original name stays the same, and th...
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing / Settings + Configuration / Tasks, Campaigns, and Events 0 Future consideration

Owner field for templates/multiple user fields

There should be a user field option that is able to populate based on CMP users and can designate as 1 user, team, or multiple. For example, we have a campaign owner field and instead of having an open text field, and we'd like to set that as one ...
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing 0 Future consideration

Step/Tasks due date range

Step/tasks due dates would have an optional date range to show a span of multiple days vs. just the due date. This would be for each task on the workflow as optional. This is beneficial because it allow more flexibility within the workflow instead...
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing / Tasks, Campaigns, and Events 0 Future consideration

Add note widget to the start page dashboard

As a user, I would like to be able to use a note widget to leave a note in campaign for internal communication
over 1 year ago in Campaign 0 Future consideration

Consider including an option to control request timeout for unifiedsearch

Hello, my client recently ran into an issue where intermittent network-failures caused Find-calls to time-out. In order to mitigate similar issues it would be convinient if there was some way to control the timeout through the public API. Here are...
almost 3 years ago in Search & Navigation 0 Future consideration

Add Async/Await APIs to avoid thread pool exhaustion

Multiple interfaces within the product are forcing clients and partners to abandon proper async/await implementations because the product does not implement async itself. This means that even if solutions properly implement async, they will eventu...
over 3 years ago in Search & Navigation 0 Future consideration

Search within a geographical location

As a developer I want to be able to search within an area. For examle "Find all dealers within 100 miles from this location". Something like this: var result = SearchClient.Instance.Search<DealerProduct>() .Filter(x => x.DealerLocation.Wi...
over 3 years ago in Search & Navigation 1 Future consideration