Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 29

Cookie security issues

Currently we are facing of some cookie missing attributes scans. The cookies are coming from optimizely, and we cannot change them. EPiStartUrlKey and epiStateMakerThis is an issue, as we cannot fix this, and the security scans are yelling at us.B...
about 1 year ago in Web Experimentation / Security 0 Will not implement

Ability to honor a Project the user is in when getting search results

Our client would like to be able to test content that is within a Project in the Search results on the site before having to publish that content. Right now they use Projects when adding new content/content updates to the site. They would like to ...
about 1 year ago in Search & Navigation 1 Will not implement

Allow to add Content in a fixed workflow even when not assigned to the current step

Since the publishing process is not always linear and the assets in Content tab need to be updated also by users not assigned to the current step, it would be very helpful to enable to do so. At the moment, not assigned users see the "Add asset" o...
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing 1 Will not implement

Workflow Fields - When applying workflow to existing tasks, choose which fields should be kept

Following field inheritance, Workflows will override existing Task fields if a Task was created with no Workflow applied. It would be nice if users got to choose which fields to remove, merge and replace.
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing / Settings + Configuration 1 Will not implement

Mixed User Authentication

As a website owner I want to allow for AD access for internal users and direct access for external users So that I can better manage resourcing requirements for development, content population and control. The outcome is the ability to assign di...
over 4 years ago in Content Management / Technical 0 Will not implement

Comme

Be able to comment from the full screen view.
over 1 year ago in Content Marketing / Tasks, Campaigns, and Events 2 Will not implement

Incorrect Link Status

We are reviewing our broken links and found that there were many links reported as broken but they appear to work fine without any issues. We also used Fiddler to ensure that the web codes are coming back as 200 and not the 403/404
about 3 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Code deployment 0 Will not implement

Provide API's to access the redirects created in CMS. Redirects manager in a headless CMS mode.

How do we leverage the redirects manager feature in CMS in a headless CMS mode. What are the different ways in which the front end application can access the redirects created through redirects manager so that it could serve the right URL. Provide...
over 3 years ago in Content Management / APIs 3 Will not implement

support SPM binaryTarget

See https://github.com/optimizely/swift-sdk/issues/478. Do you have any plan to support SPM binaryTarget? Like what https://github.com/airbnb/lottie-spm Lottie do or Facebook sdk https://github.com/facebook/facebook-ios-sdk/blob/main/Package.swift...
almost 2 years ago in Feature Experimentation / APIs 1 Will not implement

Preview API for merged output

We'd like to be able to send merge fields for a specific template and get the merged output in response so we can use this as a preview of the output to be sent.
almost 2 years ago in Campaign 0 Will not implement