Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

Content Management

Showing 395

Give warning in Visual Studio if Optimizely nuget package has security vulnerability

I do not get a warning for a vulnerable package from Optimizely like the 4.30 version of Forms. Currently visual studio gives warning if solution contains packages from nuget.org that has a security vulnerability. This is a really nice feature tha...
9 months ago in Content Management / Technical 0

Search capability missing from select page or block dialog.

If site has thousands pages and blocks, it is very difficult to select correct page or block to link each other. Current you have to browse via tree to find correct content to create link or select block. Select page or content dialog should have ...
5 months ago in Content Management / Editing 0

Restrict editor access to other microsites

We want to hide the website tree structure to the user who do not have access (even we want to remove the read-only access). For example we have multiple websites as Website A, Website B ... etc. and EditorA, EditorB ... etc. If EditorA has access...
4 months ago in Content Management / Multi-site 0

Support for Managed Identity in EPiServer.Azure

We are hosting Optimizely CMS in Azure for some customers so we are using the EPiServer.Azure nuget package for connection to Azure Storage Account and Azure Service Bus. To do this we have use the SAS key connection string. Are there any plans to...
over 1 year ago in Content Management / Technical 0

A true unpublish option or the ability to schedule the end of expiration

A true unpublish option would be a huge asset to the CMS. If that's not possible (or at least not possible soon), then the ability to schedule an end to expiration should work. It might sound like a small thing, but being able to unpublish and the...
6 months ago in Content Management / Content Manager 0

Being able to delete/move to trash orphaned blocks and media

As an editor I would like to be able to remove/move to trash a block or a media content item from the property view in the CMS. As it is now you need to have the Block or Media widget open, and if a piece of content is orphaned you don't see it in...
over 3 years ago in Content Management / Asset Management 1 Investigating

Add validation notifications on property tabs and property labels

When editing a page/block, the property validation feature is great to prevent editors publishing an incomplete or sub-optimal piece of content. However, the validation notification is only shown near the Publish dropdown menu, and the editor then...
over 1 year ago in Content Management / Editing 0

TinyMCE - Paste clean HTML from Word by default

The epi-paste functionality is confusing to our authors. They tend to select "Keep formatting" which keeps all of the Word styles in the HTML. We want clean HTML to be pasted in by default. We would like a way to just set the default behavior to p...
about 1 year ago in Content Management 0 Future consideration

Add horizontal scrollbar to page/asset pane and model windows.

As a CMS user, the page pane, asset pane, and page/asset selector modal should display horizontal scroll bars when trying to view deeply nested content items. This will improve navigation and prevent content item names from being cut off.
9 months ago in Content Management / Editing 0

Bypass approval sequence for admins

As an administrator I'd like to be able to publish content bypassing the approval sequence. Can there be a feature added to say which roles a particular approval sequence must follow?
over 3 years ago in Content Management / Collaboration & Approval 5 Future consideration