Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

Content Management

Showing 55

Enable drag and drop for PropertyList<T> in the editing experience

Would it be possible to enable drag & drop in the editing experience of property list similar to content areas. PropertyList are sometime favored in content type architecture as they take less editorial time to setup then blocks.
over 1 year ago in Content Management / Editing 2 Future consideration

Support CSP with nonce in Edit, Admin etc

It would be great if developers can configure CSP to use nonce. So that they can increase the security and control of what resources are loaded by the application. Currently almost all script tags are rendered without CSP nonces and the site is br...
10 months ago in Content Management / APIs 2 Future consideration

Support .NET 8 Blazor SSR and Razor components as templates for pages and blocks

From .NET 8 Preview 3 we see a lot of the upcoming new third Blazor mode: Blazor SSR https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/tree/main/src/Components/Samples/BlazorUnitedApp https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/asp-net-core-updates-in-dotnet-8-previ...
9 months ago in Content Management / Technical 0 Future consideration

Dark mode theme

The CMS UI is mostly white, which can be straining on the eyes. I'm convinced that adding the option to switch to a dark themed interface would be greatly appreciated by a lot of users. The option could also be automatically configured based on br...
over 2 years ago in Content Management / Editing 2 Future consideration

Task async/await support for scheduled jobs

The scheduled jobs are executed as tasks by the scheduled job executor (IScheduledJobExecutor). However the Execute method that is required to create and run a custom job does not support return type Task or Task<T> and therefore the async/a...
over 2 years ago in Content Management / Technical 2 Future consideration

Add activity logging into Form Submissions for EpiServer Forms

As GDPR administrator i would like to know who was viewing, editing data that has been sent via EpiServer Forms. This is why all actions such: - display form submissions - download form submissions report - deleted submitted data in Form Submissio...
about 3 years ago in Content Management / Forms 0 Future consideration

Make "Additional properties" section optional when creating content

Currently non-required properties are listed under a section called "Additional properties" when creating content. This gives users the impression that those properties should be filled out before clicking the "Create" button. This is particularly...
8 months ago in Content Management / Editing 2 Future consideration

Hide broken links on expired content from Link Status report

Currently, the Link Status report shows broken links that are present on expired pages. I would prefer it if broken links on expired content could be excluded from the report. This could be configurable. Jira ticket
over 3 years ago in Content Management / Technical 1 Future consideration

Bypass approval sequence for admins

As an administrator I'd like to be able to publish content bypassing the approval sequence. Can there be a feature added to say which roles a particular approval sequence must follow?
almost 3 years ago in Content Management / Collaboration & Approval 3 Future consideration

Visitor Groups / Personalization settings and Access Rights

I want to define visitor Groups & personalization settings per brand and define which users are authorized to access this (set access rights). Only users who are authorized can see the visitor groups and personalization settings.
about 4 years ago in Content Management / Personalization 1 Future consideration