Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

All feedback

Showing 1681 of 1681

Editing Cloudflare's custom error pages in DXP PaaS portal

In case of issues it's not looking good that the signature of error and challenge pages is Cloudflare. Customers want to control all content that could be served to their visitors. It would be very useful if an DXP administrator could upload or ed...
about 3 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Infrastructure mgmt. 0 Future consideration

Database Audit Logs for Compliance

Could you please consider to add a new section with in the PaaS Portal (preferably under the "Troubleshoot" section) that can be used to view the DB access logs, that contains details such as, Who access the DB and when ? and What actions are carr...
over 3 years ago in DXP Cloud Platform / Data management 4 Future consideration

Title missing on images in the Text editing fields

The mouse-over titles are missing in images added in the Text editing fields. This is a normal feature on all CMS:s so it's strange that I can't see it. This would help me make more accessible web content.
over 4 years ago in Content Management / Editing 1 Future consideration

Support .NET 8 Blazor SSR and Razor components as templates for pages and blocks

From .NET 8 Preview 3 we see a lot of the upcoming new third Blazor mode: Blazor SSR https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/tree/main/src/Components/Samples/BlazorUnitedApp https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/asp-net-core-updates-in-dotnet-8-previ...
about 1 year ago in Content Management / Technical 2 Future consideration

When copy/pasting a page in the page tree, the copy should be a draft, not published.

As an editor, I often want to copy a page to crate a new one and base new content on the original. When pasting the page in the page tree, it gets published, so I have two copies with the same content. Instead I want the copy to be a draft that I ...
about 3 years ago in Content Management / Editing 2 Investigating

Add built in support for timezone agnostic DateTime

Episervers standard behaviour is to convert DateTime between database, application and editors depending on what time zone the application and editors are in. If would be nice if there would be built in properties (or editor hints) to enable timez...
about 3 years ago in Content Management / Editing 1

Improve user experience for editors when switching from one site to another

At the moment, when a logged in editor switches from one site (Site A) to another (Site B), where she/he has access to, the user is forced to re-log-in to Site B, and the entire CMS is re-loaded, which takes a long time. The current user experienc...
about 2 years ago in Content Management / Multi-site 0 Investigating

Make prices readonly for one catalog and editable for others

I would like to have the option to make prices readonly for specific catalogs and leave them editable for others. Currently, we can implement IPriceDetailService but this will affect all of the catalogs. Would be also great if we can set different...
over 3 years ago in Customized Commerce / Catalogs 1 Gathering interest

Epi Find Interface

- Interface is too basic e.g. for the charts, we have mouse over every peak just to see each statistic. - Seems to be lacking insightful data. Would like access to download the raw data so we can massage it for a more meaningful analysis.
almost 4 years ago in Search & Navigation 3 Future consideration

Blocks in context of pages

I want blocks to behave as if they were part of the page, rather than separate entities. Primarily on the approval step.
over 5 years ago in Content Management / Editing 0 Planned