Why are spam-complaints such an impactful recipient interaction?
building and maintaining a strong sender reputation requires close monitoring and analysis of spam complaints
campaign performance reporting needs to take every single spam-complaint into account to reveal the true impact of each campaign
-
spam-complaints are extremely important to understand where our email communication strategy does not meet customer's expectation
cadence / message frequency too high
message content lacking relevance
bad quality of permissions / consent (from certain opt in source - e.g. prize games)
recipients who issued a spam-complaint require an immediate update of customer master data as a spam-complaints include the impact of an opt-out (permission / consent is withdrawn)
Goals
we receive response- & interaction-data within seconds
we process suppression events (unsubscribe, spam-complaint, bounces) close to real-time
-
we replace existing response export-jobs
-
with webhooks we can process response data immediately in order to trigger subsequent steps - e.g.
customer master data updates
re-calculation of next best offer / next best action
trigger for follow up communication within the same or an alternate communication channel
Requirements
event trigger
standard payload included in all webhook events
event specific payload
A lot if ESPs report spam complaints automatically per recipient's spam click to Campaign as a feedback loop.
These kind of reports should be observable via a webhook.