Skip to Main Content
Customer Feedback

We love feedback from you on our products and the problems in your daily work that you would like us to solve. Please describe the challenge you're encountering and your desired outcome. Be as detailed as possible.

For technical issues or bugs please head to Support or our Developer Community. You can assign up to 20 votes in total. Thank you for your feedback.

Status explanation: 'Future Consideration' = Continuing to collect further feedback, not planned at this time. 'Investigating' = Prioritized for deeper customer and feasibility investigations ahead of planning development.

ADD FEEDBACK

Content Management

Showing 362

Migration Process - Abort Action

As a developer working closely with the platform, I’d like to share some feedback about this incident and hope it can be passed along to the Optimizely management and product owners. The migration abort action had some unexpected consequences. Eve...
about 1 month ago in Content Management / Technical 0

Being able to delete/move to trash orphaned blocks and media

As an editor I would like to be able to remove/move to trash a block or a media content item from the property view in the CMS. As it is now you need to have the Block or Media widget open, and if a piece of content is orphaned you don't see it in...
over 3 years ago in Content Management / Asset Management 1 Investigating

We would like the ability to sort comments left on reviewed content

Some of the content that we review has multiple pages. It would be very helpful to be able to sort comments by page, user, etc. rather that the default timeline of when a comment was left.
about 1 year ago in Content Management / Collaboration & Approval 0

We would like to annotate and comment on content in the full-screen view

Some of our PDFs for review through the content tab are quite long and are generally easier to read in the full-screen. It would be super helpful to be able to see and add comments in that view.
about 1 year ago in Content Management / Collaboration & Approval 0

CMS 12 removed the fallback language in content area UI

In our solution, we have 31 different languages, and thus a lot of language fallbacks both for pages and blocks. In CMS 11, we could easily spot the blocks in a content area that were a fallback, it would be a slightly darker grey and also had the...
4 months ago in Content Management / Multi-language 0

Add activity logging into Form Submissions for EpiServer Forms

As GDPR administrator i would like to know who was viewing, editing data that has been sent via EpiServer Forms. This is why all actions such: - display form submissions - download form submissions report - deleted submitted data in Form Submissio...
over 3 years ago in Content Management / Forms 0 Future consideration

Language Manager errors translating for Blocks with Block List properties

I have a block which uses IList<Block> style properties for managing collections of data against the parent block rather than forcing the Content Editor to have to navigate between parent and children in the editor interface. My solution has...
9 months ago in Content Management / Editing 1

Add an option to DXC for a NodeJS server in addition to an Episerver instance

I want to have a NodeJS server running on Azure, alongside my Episerver instance. To start, this would be a simple, naked NodeJS instance. I could do whatever I like with this. It would be deployable apart from the Episerver instance -- I could pu...
almost 4 years ago in Content Management / APIs / Technical 1 Investigating

Add NotNullWhen attribute to ContentReference.IsNullOrEmpty

As a Developer I would like my static code analysis to understand that ContentReference.IsNullOrEmpty is performing an implicit null check. I have found that if (!ContentReference.IsNullOrEmpty(someLink)) is false, then my IDE will suggest me to a...
4 months ago in Content Management / Technical 0

Bypass approval sequence for admins

As an administrator I'd like to be able to publish content bypassing the approval sequence. Can there be a feature added to say which roles a particular approval sequence must follow?
about 3 years ago in Content Management / Collaboration & Approval 4 Future consideration