Skip to content

CMP (Content Marketing Platform)

CMP (Content Marketing Platform)

Categories

538 results found

  1. A client wants to prevent certain users from creating campaigns while allowing them to create/edit tasks. Where the current Collaborator and Collaborator+ roles don't allow this flexibility/customization. Can customizable permissions be a new feature?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. We are using Webhook handlers to catch New Task events and to auto populate some taxonomy data on Task creation. However, we notice that the Copy Task function on the platform cannot be differentiated from the New Task event currently, but we would need to distinguish between these two events to handle them slightly differently.

    Can a new event be created, or an attribute be added to the existing event, to allow us to identify whether a Task is new or a copy of an existing Task?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. A scroll bar at the top of all pages in the UI would be extremely helpful. We recently submitted a ticket, 1803945, because columns were hidden but it was not clearly noticeable. To view the restore button in the recycle bin, it required scrolling 5x to the bottom of the page, then scrolling right. An example for the DAM is when needing multiple columns to view metadata. When viewing a large volume of assets, you have to scroll to the bottom of the page and then scroll to the right, then scroll back up to view metadata. It is time…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Enable URL links / hyperlinking in standard free text fields on forms. Currently, hyperlinks work only in updates or rich text fields, but not in regular free text, limiting flexibility for adding references or resources.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Background / Current Behavior:
    The customer has reported that within CMP tasks, there is no trigger or notice to add the expiry date before completing the task. Additionally, there is no pop-up message indicating that the asset will not be sent to the DAM. This can lead to confusion and a poor customer experience.

    Requested Improvement / Feature:

    Introduce a clear trigger or notice within the CMP task to prompt users to add the expiry date before completion.
    Implement a pop-up message to alert users when an asset will not be sent to the DAM.

    Customer Impact:
    Without these prompts,…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. CMP Graph.

    We need to combine CMP assets results with Episerver search items. However, due to an issue in the CMP result set, the filter Id and Name values are coming in separate arrays, and the values do not align correctly.

    Currently, the facets response returns only the Name and Count fields. The Id field should also be included in the CMP facet filters response so that each facet value can be uniquely identified.

    The facet name counts are not consistent. When we apply a WHERE clause filter, the facet counts change unexpectedly. The facet name counts should remain consistent…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. It would be great if we could find a way to lock down content while it's a WIP (work in progress) for download. Once content has been approved and is final, it would be nice to be able to "release" for download and assign to project/task people once an asset is approved and uploaded to the library.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. In all our setup and configuration of CMP, we are told that using Teams in place of Users for Tasks, Workflows and assignation of steps "makes sense" as it means things are not reliant on a single person/point of failure.
    However, it is still not possible to assign ownership of a folder or asset to a Team! Our business doesn't have names individual users responsible for individual assets, we work in a team structure so having to assign a specific person as owner of an asset or group of assets goes against everything we are trying to design the solution…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. When a User comes to allocate a step, there is no restriction on who can be allocated from ALL the users on the instance (currently 400+ for us). Whilst we can "pre-allocate" a Step in the Workflow template to a Team (or User) this doesn't have the desired effect of ensuring the User allocates it to the right person in the Team...

    What we would like is for the option to restrict allocation of a certain step to a pre-defined list of Users, (or Users within a pre-defined Team) when working through a Task so that ONLY that user got…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Current Limitation:

    Routing rules only support AND logic. This significantly restricts flexibility because complex conditions require multiple separate rules instead of being combined into one.

    Impact:

    Increases setup time and complexity.
    Makes routing logic less efficient and harder to maintain.

    Proposed Enhancement:

    Introduce AND/OR logic within a single routing rule. This will allow more advanced conditional logic without creating multiple redundant rules, improving efficiency and scalability.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. In plan view, when you have expanded a column to be able to view the column title, it would be great if it could stay that way in a saved view.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Add a column (or option for a column) at the end of Plan and Library exports that is a direct link to that individual asset. If I export and share, I need my users to be able to go directly from the spreadsheet into that library item, task, campaign, etc. Long story short, add a column for the direct link in the export that goes into the Optimizely item.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Currently, only Article, Image, Video, Raw file can be added in the "Related Assets" section of assets in the DAM.

    We would need to have the structured content to be added to the allowed file types in that section.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Currently, offline pdf annotations (highlights, comments, etc) do not appear in proofing and versioning in Opti. We need the full history of these annotations. If non-Optimizely users make changes offline it disrupts the history. We either need to work completely offline, or completely in the system.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. When reports are generated from free format fields collected from Work Requests the text includes the HTML formatting code.
    This is unnecessary and should be stripped out before the report is displayed to the user.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. OOB fields are unavailable to update content that has been uploaded to a task in the planning section of a campaign. Would like to be able to add/edit description, alt text and attribution on the asset.

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. The helper text for fields in a work request form should be possible to place also directly below the field name and not only after the input field. You want to read the instructions first and then choose your option. E.g. if you have a radio button field with many options to choose from, the helper text is shown after all the options and you might not see it.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Add reference to the WRQ number if a task was created from it:

    Customer reports the lack of visibility between Tasks and Work Requests, as well as the inability to see who completed each Task in the reports.
    This is a critical requirement for DHL Group and DHL Express.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. On the form upload, some customers need a file size that is large enough to be meaningful for their design requirements (headshot for organization page)

    Often users upload low resolution images and that causes more back and forth. If we can have a size requirement on the upload that would help resolve that.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Integrations and Automations have alway had to be advanced in filtering unwanted events, having to make many requests to get data that confirms it the event is not relevant.

    Now Opal has to do the same, causing many credits to be spent just to get to the outcome the event is not relevant to the task.

    The solution would be to add filters to webhooks, like only fire work request modified for specific templates, etc. Could configurable filters be added to Webhooks?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 6 8 10 26 27
  • Don't see your idea?