Skip to content

CMP (Content Marketing Platform)

CMP (Content Marketing Platform)

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

373 results found

  1. Role:
    Admin

    Issue:
    At the moment, there is no way to document SLAs for sub-steps. We'd like to be able to do this in the same way that it is done for whole steps.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Role: Admin

    Issue:
    There appears to be a significant amount of padding between fields and text. Oftentimes, we need to use the text option to explain a field because there is a character limit on help text. So we're using the text feature to explain what ought to be in help text.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. We'd love to be able to remove the character limits for Help Text.. Currently, the help text limit is 120 characters, and most teams need more space than this to explain their ask.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Role: Admin

    Issue:
    When creating a field using the Checkbox function, all options in the field are limited to a certain character limit before an elipses appears. We'd like to remove those ellipsis.

    Expected Outcome:
    No ellipses appears on any options authored in Checkboxes.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Add logic to fields in workflows/task forms: A way to have the dropdown options trigger a sub-dropdown list with items that are only applicable to the item selected in the first dropdown.

    This functionality already exists in Work Requests.

    For example, we need to know if your dog barks at night, but only if you chose dog in the "Do you have a dog or cat?" field. Cat owners shouldn't have to respond to the question about barking since it's not relevant.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Role: Admin

    Issue:
    In Work Request, if there are ANY fields in the form that are required, then everyone has to fill out that field (even if they would've skipped that field due to logic authored in a previous field.) We need a way to make only certain fields required for certain responders so that we segregate who has to answer certain questions.

    Expected Outcome:
    When authoring a work request, and logic is applied to certain fields, only those who logically land on that field should be required to fill it out.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Role: Admin

    Issue:
    In dropdowns, we'd like to be able to maintain the ordered list of items as they've been authored. Currently, no matter which order you author the content in a dropdown, it will be re-ordered so that the items in the dropdown list are in alphabetical order.

    Teams have been trying different things to get around this, as you can imagine they have a particular order they'd like to see their items, and for good reason. Having a list of 20 items (and then "N/A" showing up in the middle of the list instead of at the bottom…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. We have a large team running lots of campaigns at the same time. However, when you use the search function in the Plan module of CMP, it treats each word as a separate value and not a phrase. For example, if I search "Content Migration" in an attempt to pull up a campaign of that name, I get everything that has either "content" or "migration" in the title but not "content migration" as a single phrase. It makes the search feature essentially useless and extremely cumbersome.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. We are creating workflows where steps of the workflow ALWAYS need to go back to the user who created/started the workflow.

    It would be really useful to have an option to select "Task Owner", or similar, as a pre-defined user/team on a workflow template step, instead of the user having to assign steps back to themselves manually in every task.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Should be able to backdate start/end dates in requests.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. I'm an admin trying to do some troubleshooting. I would like to have a feature in CMP to "log in as" another user to better understand issues reported by users.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Our team regularly proofed large (think 200 page) PDFs. We often use annotation features like the strikeout for other team members to make changes, but currently every single strikeout requires an associated comment. I understand the need to have comments with other types of annotations for guidance, but given the intent of a strikeout is pretty clear, could there be a setting to make comments not mandatory for a strikeout?

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. It would be nice if when copying tasks, the dates within the workflow carried over. There are times where we have repeatable items due within a given timeframe (Opticon for example) and it would save a lot of time adjusting timelines.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. It would be helpful to provide an option for users or customer organizations to choose whether they want to receive generated reports via email.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. I perceive the CMP organization calendar as an "external helper", and not a way to keep track on who is OOO - as other tools do that already.

    Any way to add holidays without them impacting inviduals OOO settings?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. We need to limit some users in what they can do in a task, like they can add content or complete their steps, but they can't change fields or asset expiry date once the asset has been approved in the task

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. We would like members of teams to be able to archive assets in a folder, whilst not having permissions to delete the asset.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Based on a brief type I would like users to have limited options about the available workflows they can select. For example, for a social brief, only a select range of workflows which are relevant to social briefs should appear as options.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. When a new version of an asset is uploaded we feel the previous approvals should be invalidated? It would also be really helpful to link the comments and resolutions to a version of an asset for accuracy of the audit trail.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. I'm an admin and active CMP uploader - it would be very useful to be able to filter via who uploaded the asset (Owner). This is not a field I can choose for filtering which would really help me with my day to day work and with maintenance of our uploads.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    New  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?